Jamest, I offer you serious discussion

Post Reply
jamest
Posts: 1381
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 9:10 pm
Contact:
Contact jamest

Re: Jamest, I offer you serious discussion

Post by jamest » Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:30 pm

You make hackenslash look like a genius. And he's a cunt, as he readily admits.
Top
User avatar
pErvinalia
On the good stuff
Posts: 60733
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
Location: dystopia
Contact:
Contact pErvinalia

Re: Jamest, I offer you serious discussion

Post by pErvinalia » Sat Apr 04, 2015 4:29 am

Xamonas Chegwé wrote:The lack of anyone supporting your side in this should be a clue, Rev. :tea:
This biggest clue as to who is right and who is wrong is that one side has on it a theist who doesn't think the world exists and who thinks he's smarter than Newton and Godel.... ;)
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.
Top
User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74151
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:
Contact JimC

Re: Jamest, I offer you serious discussion

Post by JimC » Sat Apr 04, 2015 5:04 am

rEvolutionist wrote:
Xamonas Chegwé wrote:The lack of anyone supporting your side in this should be a clue, Rev. :tea:
This biggest clue as to who is right and who is wrong is that one side has on it a theist who doesn't think the world exists and who thinks he's smarter than Newton and Godel.... ;)
All the more important to keep your definitions of terms on the conservative side, which means leaving the term "algorithm" as its most commonly defined meaning, a finite series of computational steps designed to achieve a given goal...

Then the argument can examine clearly whether the physical universe we observe and model is sufficient in itself, or whether an élan vital is required...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!
Top
User avatar
Xamonas Chegwé
Bouncer
Bouncer
Posts: 50939
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse.
Location: Nottingham UK
Contact:
Contact Xamonas Chegwé

Re: Jamest, I offer you serious discussion

Post by Xamonas Chegwé » Sat Apr 04, 2015 1:28 pm

rEvolutionist wrote:
Xamonas Chegwé wrote:The lack of anyone supporting your side in this should be a clue, Rev. :tea:
This biggest clue as to who is right and who is wrong is that one side has on it a theist who doesn't think the world exists and who thinks he's smarter than Newton and Godel.... ;)
Ah. A genuine, classic ad hominum "poisoning the well" fallacy. Do continue, Sir. :tea:
A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing :nono:
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur
Top
Post Reply

Return to “General Serious Discussion & Philosophy”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests