Most spectacular piece of historical revisionism in film.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Most spectacular piece of historical revisionism in film

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Sat May 08, 2010 11:55 am

Geoff wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:Any movie about Robin Hood.

Any movie about King Arthur.

Any movie about The Old West.
Any movie about Pearl harbour?
Especially if they can't spell it right. :lay:
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Ian
Mr Incredible
Posts: 16975
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:42 pm
Location: Washington DC

Re: Most spectacular piece of historical revisionism in film

Post by Ian » Sat May 08, 2010 11:56 am

Thirteen Days just came to mind. I really like that movie, but there was plenty of inaccurate stuff in it.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Most spectacular piece of historical revisionism in film

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Sat May 08, 2010 11:58 am

Brigham Young (1940)

I win. Lock thread.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

PsychoSerenity
"I" Self-Perceive Recursively
Posts: 7824
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:57 am
Contact:

Re: Most spectacular piece of historical revisionism in film

Post by PsychoSerenity » Sat May 08, 2010 11:58 am

Gawdzilla wrote:Any movie about Robin Hood.
Oh, I don't know, this one seems fairly accurate.

Last edited by PsychoSerenity on Sat May 08, 2010 12:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
[Disclaimer - if this is comes across like I think I know what I'm talking about, I want to make it clear that I don't. I'm just trying to get my thoughts down]

User avatar
Ian
Mr Incredible
Posts: 16975
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:42 pm
Location: Washington DC

Re: Most spectacular piece of historical revisionism in film

Post by Ian » Sat May 08, 2010 11:59 am

Gawdzilla wrote:Brigham Young (1940)

I win. Lock thread.
I've only seen the 3-second clip shown in Religulous:
"This is not an easy religion..."
:hehe:
Last edited by Ian on Sat May 08, 2010 12:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Most spectacular piece of historical revisionism in film

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Sat May 08, 2010 12:00 pm

Ian wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:Brigham Young (1940)

I win. Lock thread.
I've only seen the 3-seconf clip shown in Religulous:
"This is not an easy religion..."
:hehe:
I'm so wanting to "fix" that.

"This is not an made-up religion..."

"This is not an intelligent religion..."

"This is not an totally whacko religion..."
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Geoff
Pouncer
Posts: 9374
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 4:39 pm
Location: Wigan, UK
Contact:

Re: Most spectacular piece of historical revisionism in film

Post by Geoff » Sat May 08, 2010 12:01 pm

LOTR - it was Glorfindel at the Ford of Bruinen, not Arwen, FFS! (and lots of other revisions!)
Image
"...anyone who says it’s “just the Internet” can :pawiz: . And then when they come back, they can :pawiz: again." - Tigger

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Most spectacular piece of historical revisionism in film

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Sat May 08, 2010 12:02 pm

Geoff wrote:LOTR - it was Glorfindel at the Ford of Bruinen, not Arwen, FFS! (and lots of other revisions!)
WHERE THE FUCK WAS TOM BOMBADIL?
WHERE WAS THE SCOURGING OF THE SHIRE?
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Pappa
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Posts: 56488
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
Contact:

Re: Most spectacular piece of historical revisionism in film

Post by Pappa » Sun May 09, 2010 11:46 pm

Gawdzilla wrote:
Geoff wrote:LOTR - it was Glorfindel at the Ford of Bruinen, not Arwen, FFS! (and lots of other revisions!)
WHERE THE FUCK WAS TOM BOMBADIL?
WHERE WAS THE SCOURGING OF THE SHIRE?
It's only a movie. :tea:
For information on ways to help support Rationalia financially, see our funding page.


When the aliens do come, everything we once thought was cool will then make us ashamed.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Most spectacular piece of historical revisionism in film

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Sun May 09, 2010 11:51 pm

Pappa wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:
Geoff wrote:LOTR - it was Glorfindel at the Ford of Bruinen, not Arwen, FFS! (and lots of other revisions!)
WHERE THE FUCK WAS TOM BOMBADIL?
WHERE WAS THE SCOURGING OF THE SHIRE?
It's only a movie. :tea:
:pawiz: It's LOTR, you Philistine. :Erasb:
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Pappa
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Posts: 56488
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
Contact:

Re: Most spectacular piece of historical revisionism in film

Post by Pappa » Sun May 09, 2010 11:54 pm

Gawdzilla wrote:
Pappa wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:
Geoff wrote:LOTR - it was Glorfindel at the Ford of Bruinen, not Arwen, FFS! (and lots of other revisions!)
WHERE THE FUCK WAS TOM BOMBADIL?
WHERE WAS THE SCOURGING OF THE SHIRE?
It's only a movie. :tea:
:pawiz: It's LOTR, you Philistine. :Erasb:
I thought the films were better than the book... because I think the book is shit. :read:
For information on ways to help support Rationalia financially, see our funding page.


When the aliens do come, everything we once thought was cool will then make us ashamed.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Most spectacular piece of historical revisionism in film

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Mon May 10, 2010 12:04 am

Pappa wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:
Pappa wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:
Geoff wrote:LOTR - it was Glorfindel at the Ford of Bruinen, not Arwen, FFS! (and lots of other revisions!)
WHERE THE FUCK WAS TOM BOMBADIL?
WHERE WAS THE SCOURGING OF THE SHIRE?
It's only a movie. :tea:
:pawiz: It's LOTR, you Philistine. :Erasb:
I thought the films were better than the book... because I think the book is shit. :read:
Yeah, the "children's illustrated" edition wasn't a straw on the real book. A few years and you'll be ready for the grown up version.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Pappa
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Posts: 56488
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
Contact:

Re: Most spectacular piece of historical revisionism in film

Post by Pappa » Mon May 10, 2010 12:10 am

Gawdzilla wrote:Yeah, the "children's illustrated" edition wasn't a straw on the real book. A few years and you'll be ready for the grown up version.
I think the grown up one is completely infantile.... seriously.

:sofa:
For information on ways to help support Rationalia financially, see our funding page.


When the aliens do come, everything we once thought was cool will then make us ashamed.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Most spectacular piece of historical revisionism in film

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Mon May 10, 2010 12:19 am

Pappa wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:Yeah, the "children's illustrated" edition wasn't a straw on the real book. A few years and you'll be ready for the grown up version.
I think the grown up one is completely infantile.... seriously.

:sofa:
It's far from a la-de-da fairy tale. It's a struggle for survival between two opposing systems of life. Don't let the fact that the word "elf" appears in the book. Those boys are warriors, they have to be to even exist. And victory in the war means their own system will disappear from Middle Earth. So even if they "win", they lose. It's only how they will go out, through the Grey Havens or skewered on a orc sword, that they get to choose. The Elven folk are the real atheists of the book. They don't have souls and they know it. If they die, they're dead. And yet they lead good lives whenever they can, and valiant ones when they must. They always leave the earth better than they found it. I would happily take a life as a warrior elf in the service of Elrond or Gladriel.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Pappa
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Posts: 56488
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
Contact:

Re: Most spectacular piece of historical revisionism in film

Post by Pappa » Mon May 10, 2010 12:23 am

Gawdzilla wrote:
Pappa wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:Yeah, the "children's illustrated" edition wasn't a straw on the real book. A few years and you'll be ready for the grown up version.
I think the grown up one is completely infantile.... seriously.

:sofa:
It's far from a la-de-da fairy tale. It's a struggle for survival between two opposing systems of life. Don't let the fact that the word "elf" appears in the book. Those boys are warriors, they have to be to even exist. And victory in the war means their own system will disappear from Middle Earth. So even if they "win", they lose. It's only how they will go out, through the Grey Havens or skewered on a orc sword, that they get to choose. The Elven folk are the real atheists of the book. They don't have souls and they know it. If they die, they're dead. And yet they lead good lives whenever they can, and valiant ones when they must. They always leave the earth better than they found it. I would happily take a life as a warrior elf in the service of Elrond or Gladriel.
I find Tolkein's story-telling technique to me infantile, almost patronising. I never felt there was any depth to it, no matter how much detail he put in.
For information on ways to help support Rationalia financially, see our funding page.


When the aliens do come, everything we once thought was cool will then make us ashamed.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest