


Xamonas Chegwé wrote:I loved it. It is not for everyone but I loved it. Here's what I said earlier.
http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=333891#p333891


Chinaski wrote:Other Coen films have much more action than A Serious Man, true. But it's not dull at all, it had me riveted the entire time. And laughing my arse off as well, I might add. I need to see it again before I can comment on exactly why I liked it.
James Cameron should still kill himself for diverting so much attention from it though.

Animavore wrote:You're wrong Eli.
But so is Eli so don't worry about it.

Elessarina wrote:Animavore wrote:You're wrong Eli.
But so is Eli so don't worry about it.
What? Who is Eli?
Hmm anyway I don't think I can actually be wrong if I am expressing an opinion on something I like or dislike.. can I?

Clinton Huxley wrote:I liked it. Not my favourite Coen film but I think it still had their trademark quirks. Made me laugh out loud more than once and I do use find myself using one of the lines from it...."Very troubling, very troubling".
I'd watch it again.

Elessarina wrote:Clinton Huxley wrote:I liked it. Not my favourite Coen film but I think it still had their trademark quirks. Made me laugh out loud more than once and I do use find myself using one of the lines from it...."Very troubling, very troubling".
I'd watch it again.
ugh.. it didn't make me laugh at all and I just didn't really care what happened..![]()
I hate it when that happens.. it's so disappointing.. I was very disappointed as I had been reading about it for a while..



Xamonas Chegwé wrote:I hate it when that happens.. it's so disappointing.. I was very disappointed as I had been reading about it for a while..
[/quote]

Animavore wrote:Coen brothers are terribly hit and miss to me. Some of their films are great and some are just dull. No Country for Old Men is one such example.
There. I said it.

Animavore wrote:Coen brothers are terribly hit and miss to me. Some of their films are great and some are just dull. No Country for Old Men is one such example.
There. I said it.


Xamonas Chegwé wrote:Animavore wrote:Coen brothers are terribly hit and miss to me. Some of their films are great and some are just dull. No Country for Old Men is one such example.
There. I said it.
You lie!!![]()
Intolerable Cruelty was crap. Ladykillers was ill-advised but not really that bad a film if you can forget the original and take it on its own merits. Everything else has been pretty good or better.



Clinton Huxley wrote:The Coen's have had a few duds but that can happen to anyone. Ridley Scott made G.I. Jane after all. At least they try to do different things. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. They made The Big Leboswki and for that alone they deserve their place in the pantheon of immortals.

Animavore wrote:Yeah but up 'til now XC's and my opinions have been almost the exact same. This is a bit of a shock to me. I was sure the consensus of Ladykillers crapness was as unanimous as that of Battlefield Earth.
I've never seen Intolerable Cruelty.

Animavore wrote:
Didn't like that the first time but now love it. Wasn't sure why that was.

Animavore wrote:Clinton Huxley wrote:The Coen's have had a few duds but that can happen to anyone. Ridley Scott made G.I. Jane after all. At least they try to do different things. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. They made The Big Leboswki and for that alone they deserve their place in the pantheon of immortals.
Didn't like that the first time but now love it. Wasn't sure why that was.
Elessarina wrote:Animavore wrote:
Didn't like that the first time but now love it. Wasn't sure why that was.
Ditto.. I have it in my rewatch list

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest