Hello

[rasetsu]

Maybe you have already, and accept it.

I found it pretty damning, but I guess I won't know.

So this 'totally true' solid definition of transgender...can you tell me the real difference between a transgender, and a woman?

Or a transgender, and a demented bathroom-predator sex pervert?

Or can it be anyone, as long as they express a certain set of thoughts?

We'll give you an acceptable definition of transgender when you can give an acceptable definition of cherry-picking.

[Cunt]

We'll give you an acceptable definition of transgender when you can give an acceptable definition of cherry-picking.

I don't care about your 'definitions', since it's all very well covered by 'anyone with at least one x chromosome'.

But I'll give you a real-world example of 'cherry-picking'.

The Dems cherry picked video bits to release, which supported their story of J6. They put out cherries they chose, to craft the story they needed told about the events of that day.

You can see this, by looking much more of the footage now, or referring back to some of the dismissed cases.

The funniest part to me is, how firmly rubes hold on to their belief, despite new footage being released. It's almost like they know the cherries were picked especially to tell one story, and it doesn't matter what reality is.

Of course, the smart and patient observer will wait to see more of the evidence, before becoming emotionally attached to the story told by the three-letter agencies (ABC/NBC/FBI/CNN/ETC.)

[Cunt]

It's coming out now though...
https://conservativebrief.com/senator-m ... medium=ABC

Utah Republican Sen. Mike Lee has roasted former Republican Rep. Liz Cheney after never before seen footage from the Capitol riot has been seen.

Some of the video from January 6 shows Capitol Police officers guiding one man in handcuffs to a private area where they remove his handcuffs, they fist bump, and he leaves.

In response to that video being leaked, Cheney showed footage of the riot, which has been seen countless times, and to which Sen. Lee responded.

“Liz, we’ve seen footage like that a million times. You made sure we saw that—and nothing else. It’s the other stuff—what you deliberately hid from us—that we find so upsetting. Nice try. P.S. How many of these guys are feds? (As if you’d ever tell us),” he said.

“The American people deserve to know the truth about what happened on January 6th. We have demanded to see all the footage. Transparency is coming,” Gaetz said. “Every time from the JFK files, to 9/11, to now January 6th. It’s our own government, our own Department of Justice that seems to stand in the way of transparency.”

But don't worry, the opinion pushed onto the public by the three-letter agencies' cherry-picking is probably fully honest. No reason to doubt the official narrative on this one.

[rasetsu]

Well if Mike Lee said it then it must be true. And you call us gullible.

[Cunt]

Well if Mike Lee said it then it must be true. And you call us gullible.

Doesn't even matter who he is. You missed the cherry-picking.

Dems cherry-picked video footage, to support their story.

Now the rest of the footage is coming out. Why hide it so long, if not to protect their 'cherry-picked' stories?

[rasetsu]

Well if Mike Lee said it then it must be true. And you call us gullible.

Doesn't even matter who he is. You missed the cherry-picking.

Dems cherry-picked video footage, to support their story.

Now the rest of the footage is coming out. Why hide it so long, if not to protect their 'cherry-picked' stories?

There's only one flaw with your theory. It's Republicans who have controlled the footage since January.

[Cunt]

Well if Mike Lee said it then it must be true. And you call us gullible.

Doesn't even matter who he is. You missed the cherry-picking.

Dems cherry-picked video footage, to support their story.

Now the rest of the footage is coming out. Why hide it so long, if not to protect their 'cherry-picked' stories?

There's only one flaw with your theory. It's Republicans who have controlled the footage since January.

That's part of your problem. It's the UNIPARTY who have controlled the footage.

Why would you trust them over your own eyes?

‘The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.’

[Tero]

[rasetsu]

That's part of your problem.

[Cunt]

That's part of your problem.

Why do you trust the cherry-picked footage over the more complete footage?

Nevermind, it's obvious.

[Cunt]

Meanwhile, antifa keeping it classy...

https://thepostmillennial.com/portland- ... aign=64470

The women's rights organization published video testimonials on X of the violence that they faced during the event at the hands of trans-identified biological men, referring to the assaults as "male terrorism against women."

A woman named Melinda said that her phone "was seized and smashed before she was hit in the face with a full can of pepper spray."

"I was blinded and in a lot of pain," she said, explaining that it was difficult to help her friend. Antifa "kept hitting her and hitting her," she said.

[pErvinalia]

That there's footage not showing violence doesn't change the fact that there was violence. What is it you think this new footage proves?

[Brian Peacock]

Well if Mike Lee said it then it must be true. And you call us gullible.

Doesn't even matter who he is. You missed the cherry-picking.

Dems cherry-picked video footage, to support their story.

Now the rest of the footage is coming out. Why hide it so long, if not to protect their 'cherry-picked' stories?

Participants streamed it live on Facebook. Do you really think that some video of a cop smiling makes all the rest of it go away?

[pErvinalia]

No it means the cops and three letter agencies were in on it. Duh.

[JimC]

I prefer 4 letter agencies, like the highly secretive FUCK - Furtive United Corporate Killers...