Scientific Proof Of God

[rasetsu]

I was thinking about this last night and I realized that the title is an oxymoron. There is no such thing as a "scientific proof of God," or for that matter, a "scientific proof of miracles." That's a contradiction in terms. But given the evasiveness of superwhatchmacallit so far, I doubt it matters. I don't think the man has any balls.

[JimC]

I see a few hundred pages now, and have glanced in from time to time. You guys are so diligent, that there MUST be some scientific proof of god here by now...

So is there? If so, which god?

NostrilAnus is afraid to go there. I think he knows deep down that he'll be hammered in an argument if he tries to describe his God.

How can one describe the ineffable?

[JimC]

According to Popper, science can never prove anything, it can only disprove a faulty hypothesis.

IMO, god is a faulty hypothesis...

[rasetsu]

I see a few hundred pages now, and have glanced in from time to time. You guys are so diligent, that there MUST be some scientific proof of god here by now...

So is there? If so, which god?

NostrilAnus is afraid to go there. I think he knows deep down that he'll be hammered in an argument if he tries to describe his God.

How can one describe the ineffable?

You'll never know if you don't effing try.

[JimC]

[JimC]

"God is ineffable"

"Does that mean he can't be effed?"

"That would explain a lot..."

[rasetsu]

[Sean Hayden]

[superuniverse]

Guess someone who could predict the future would make them the smartest person that ever lived...

[Svartalf]

A DISHONEST LIAR

...so tell me honestly about your God.

No lying.

But his god is a cake, more specifically a cake of lye.

[Svartalf]

I see a few hundred pages now, and have glanced in from time to time. You guys are so diligent, that there MUST be some scientific proof of god here by now...

So is there? If so, which god?

To direct your sarcasm more effectively, try using the singular "guy"...

But guy should be in the plural when addressing fawkes, should it not?

[Svartalf]

I see a few hundred pages now, and have glanced in from time to time. You guys are so diligent, that there MUST be some scientific proof of god here by now...

So is there? If so, which god?

NostrilAnus is afraid to go there. I think he knows deep down that he'll be hammered in an argument if he tries to describe his God.

How can one describe the ineffable?

Imperfectly, then again, we're not the ones dodging the matter of squaring the circle since the beginning of this thread we started by claiming we had a demonstration of it.

[Svartalf]

According to Popper, science can never prove anything, it can only disprove a faulty hypothesis.

IMO, god is a faulty hypothesis...

Popper had had too much of himself at an orgy the night before he wrote that.

[Svartalf]

"God is ineffable"

"Does that mean he can't be effed?"

"That would explain a lot..."

Well, god's ways being impenetrable is our classical explanation about why the Roman soldiers did not rape jesus as part of the mistreatments before he got nailed up.

[Brian Peacock]

Well, he was all-knowing so would've been able to tell beforehand. And all-powerful, so he just could've made them not do it, by magic.