The trouble here is that if we provide evidence it will lead to your complete annihilation. Do you still see want to see?
Look, you credulous goatfucker, you created this very thread as "Scientific Proof Of God". Now, either you deliver, and since you warned us, if it destroys us, it will be on our own heads, or you go back tend your flock and will be welcome to report if the loving attentions you dispense your beasts result in any miraculous offspring.
The pathetic creature is too scared to define the Deity it pretends to be able to prove.
Terrified that his entire fantasy will be exposed and show that the delusion of proof is nothing but the feverish imagination of a psychotic episode.
The trouble here is that if we provide evidence it will lead to your complete annihilation. Do you still see want to see?
Yes. I challenge you to put your assertion to the test. This thread you created is the exact right location to do so. You did title it "Scientific Proof Of God". So, how about it? In your own words, thanks. Youtube clips featuring Depeche Mode and Herbert Marcuse won't do it.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
The trouble here is that if we provide evidence it will lead to your complete annihilation. Do you still see want to see?
Yes. I challenge you to put your assertion to the test. This thread you created is the exact right location to do so. You did title it "Scientific Proof Of God". So, how about it? In your own words, thanks. Youtube clips featuring Depeche Mode and Herbert Marcuse won't do it.
No Scientific Proof is possible without defining what one is trying to prove.
The trouble here is that if we provide evidence it will lead to your complete annihilation. Do you still see want to see?
Yes. I challenge you to put your assertion to the test. This thread you created is the exact right location to do so. You did title it "Scientific Proof Of God". So, how about it? In your own words, thanks. Youtube clips featuring Depeche Mode and Herbert Marcuse won't do it.
No Scientific Proof is possible without defining what one is trying to prove.
You mean the all-powerful and all-knowing creator of the universe?
The trouble here is that if we provide evidence it will lead to your complete annihilation. Do you still see want to see?
Yes. I challenge you to put your assertion to the test. This thread you created is the exact right location to do so. You did title it "Scientific Proof Of God". So, how about it? In your own words, thanks. Youtube clips featuring Depeche Mode and Herbert Marcuse won't do it.
The trouble here is that if we provide evidence it will lead to your complete annihilation. Do you still see want to see?
Look, you credulous goatfucker, you created this very thread as "Scientific Proof Of God". Now, either you deliver, and since you warned us, if it destroys us, it will be on our own heads, or you go back tend your flock and will be welcome to report if the loving attentions you dispense your beasts result in any miraculous offspring.
The pathetic creature is too scared to define the Deity it pretends to be able to prove.
Terrified that his entire fantasy will be exposed and show that the delusion of proof is nothing but the feverish imagination of a psychotic episode.
You do understand you are part of a minority of fools?
The trouble here is that if we provide evidence it will lead to your complete annihilation. Do you still see want to see?
Yes. I challenge you to put your assertion to the test. This thread you created is the exact right location to do so. You did title it "Scientific Proof Of God". So, how about it? In your own words, thanks. Youtube clips featuring Depeche Mode and Herbert Marcuse won't do it.
No Scientific Proof is possible without defining what one is trying to prove.
You guys definitely need to learn a hard lesson. When the Divine steps in you know you are in serious trouble. Your BS and lies has real-world consequences.
The trouble here is that if we provide evidence it will lead to your complete annihilation. Do you still see want to see?
Yes. I challenge you to put your assertion to the test. This thread you created is the exact right location to do so. You did title it "Scientific Proof Of God". So, how about it? In your own words, thanks. Youtube clips featuring Depeche Mode and Herbert Marcuse won't do it.
The trouble here is that if we provide evidence it will lead to your complete annihilation. Do you still see want to see?
Yes. I challenge you to put your assertion to the test. This thread you created is the exact right location to do so. You did title it "Scientific Proof Of God". So, how about it? In your own words, thanks. Youtube clips featuring Depeche Mode and Herbert Marcuse won't do it.
You "missed" NOSTRADAMUS, you no-name clown..
OK, so let me amend:
Yes. I challenge you to put your assertion to the test. This thread you created is the exact right location to do so. You did title it "Scientific Proof Of God". So, how about it? In your own words, thanks. Youtube clips featuring Depeche Mode, Herbert Marcuse and Nostradamus won't do it.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
Let's face it, soupie has silly beliefs that are silly enough he doesn't even dare talk clearly about them, and that have precisely zero logical or factual support. Let's all put him on ignore and go live our own lives.
[quote=Svartalf post_id=1924922 time=1638861943 user_id=1017]
Let's face it, soupie has silly beliefs that are silly enough he doesn't even dare talk clearly about them, and that have precisely zero logical or factual support. Let's all put him on ignore and go live our own lives[/quote]
My beliefs have nothing to do with you, unless you feel the need to challenge them.
But you are not offering therapy. Rather, you are trying to protecct your own delusions, since they are incompatible with what I am saying.
I have given my definition of God. It is clear to 99.99% of the population.
The trouble here is that if we provide evidence it will lead to your complete annihilation. Do you still see want to see?
Yes. I challenge you to put your assertion to the test. This thread you created is the exact right location to do so. You did title it "Scientific Proof Of God". So, how about it? In your own words, thanks. Youtube clips featuring Depeche Mode and Herbert Marcuse won't do it.
You "missed" NOSTRADAMUS, you no-name clown..
OK, so let me amend:
Yes. I challenge you to put your assertion to the test. This thread you created is the exact right location to do so. You did title it "Scientific Proof Of God". So, how about it? In your own words, thanks. Youtube clips featuring Depeche Mode, Herbert Marcuse and Nostradamus won't do it.
Since you remain no-name, nothing you say means anything.
Let's face it, soupie has silly beliefs that are silly enough he doesn't even dare talk clearly about them, and that have precisely zero logical or factual support. Let's all put him on ignore and go live our own lives
My beliefs have nothing to do with you, unless you feel the need to challenge them.
But you are not offering therapy. Rather, you are trying to protecct your own delusions, since they are incompatible with what I am saying.
I have given my definition of God. It is clear to 99.99% of the population.
Which is why you have been making promises you never made good on and keep threatening us with fire, brimstone, the lake of flame, and utter destruction?
Actually, you've so utterly failed to make a case for them I don't feel any need to challenge them, I simply dismiss them.
