God's Loophole.
God's Loophole.
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: God's Loophole.
Might need a NSFW flag on that one. Just sayin'.
Re: God's Loophole.
Nah. It's a good, Christian song.
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.
-
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: God's Loophole.
The Bible doesn't specifically prohibit sodomy?
Re: God's Loophole.
Not man on woman sodomy, I don't think so (not 100%).Coito ergo sum wrote:The Bible doesn't specifically prohibit sodomy?
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: God's Loophole.
Only for Sodomites. I.e., gays.Coito ergo sum wrote:The Bible doesn't specifically prohibit sodomy?
-
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: God's Loophole.
Well, any unmarried fornication is as much of a sin as vaginal sex, which is stated several places in the Bible. So, high school girls giving up their asses for their boyfriends would not be a loophole.Animavore wrote:Not man on woman sodomy, I don't think so (not 100%).Coito ergo sum wrote:The Bible doesn't specifically prohibit sodomy?
I suppose the idea of anal sex within marriage might be debatable.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: God's Loophole.
Believers are free to cherry-pick, so those prohibitions don't count.Coito ergo sum wrote:Well, any unmarried fornication is as much of a sin as vaginal sex, which is stated several places in the Bible. So, high school girls giving up their asses for their boyfriends would not be a loophole.Animavore wrote:Not man on woman sodomy, I don't think so (not 100%).Coito ergo sum wrote:The Bible doesn't specifically prohibit sodomy?
I suppose the idea of anal sex within marriage might be debatable.
- Faithfree
- The Potable Atheist
- Posts: 16173
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 11:58 am
- About me: All things in moderation, including moderation
- Location: Planet of the grapes
- Contact:
Re: God's Loophole.
Well, if it was ok for Jesus and Mary Magdalen ...
Although it may look like a forum, this site is actually a crowd-sourced science project modelling the slow but inexorable heat death of the universe.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: God's Loophole.
"I don't know how to love him,Faithfree wrote:Well, if it was ok for Jesus and Mary Magdalen ...
What to do, where he pokes me.
He's a man, a backdoor man,
And I've had so many, many men,
In very different ways,
He like to cornhole."
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 41041
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: God's Loophole.
It was OK for St Joan of Arc and Gilles de Rais.Faithfree wrote:Well, if it was ok for Jesus and Mary Magdalen ...
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
-
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: God's Loophole.
I love Garfunkel & Oates... lol [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7n39RzgV ... FIhEQH9nTA[/youtube]
-
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: God's Loophole.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LbTB3ASk ... FIhEQH9nTA[/youtube] 

-
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: God's Loophole.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stEXPIh9 ... FIhEQH9nTA[/youtube]
Err.... ladies... just grip it and stroke. There is hardly a wrong way to do it. And, do what you want with the balls, but just don't hit them or squash them, or try to switch them because they are connected to little tubes. It ain't rocket science. LOL
Err.... ladies... just grip it and stroke. There is hardly a wrong way to do it. And, do what you want with the balls, but just don't hit them or squash them, or try to switch them because they are connected to little tubes. It ain't rocket science. LOL
- JimC
- The sentimental bloke
- Posts: 74159
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
- About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: God's Loophole.
Believers picked my cherry!Gawdzilla Sama wrote:Believers are free to cherry-pick, so those prohibitions don't count.Coito ergo sum wrote:Well, any unmarried fornication is as much of a sin as vaginal sex, which is stated several places in the Bible. So, high school girls giving up their asses for their boyfriends would not be a loophole.Animavore wrote:Not man on woman sodomy, I don't think so (not 100%).Coito ergo sum wrote:The Bible doesn't specifically prohibit sodomy?
I suppose the idea of anal sex within marriage might be debatable.

Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!
And my gin!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests