Joseph fucked Mary

[Tero]

It's right in the Bible. Matthew 1. "He knew her not till she had...Jesus." The till means he knew (fucked) her afterwards. There are no complications in the birth bit, she was a healthy female.

What is it with these Catholics and Mexicans. Virgin Mary my ass.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

It's right in the Bible. Matthew 1. "He knew her not till she had...Jesus." The till means he knew (fucked) her afterwards. There are no complications in the birth bit, she was a healthy female.

What is it with these Catholics and Mexicans. Virgin Mary my ass.

It's called "cherry picking".

[klr]

It's right in the Bible. Matthew 1. "He knew her not till she had...Jesus." The till means he knew (fucked) her afterwards. There are no complications in the birth bit, she was a healthy female.

What is it with these Catholics and Mexicans. Virgin Mary my ass.

It's called "cherry picking".

I see what you did there ...

[cronus]

Mary did it not Joseph. She was a golddigger. Can you imagine how lucrative it was to marry a carpenter before the invention of plastic?

[Svartalf]

It's right in the Bible. Matthew 1. "He knew her not till she had...Jesus." The till means he knew (fucked) her afterwards. There are no complications in the birth bit, she was a healthy female.

What is it with these Catholics and Mexicans. Virgin Mary my ass.

It's called "cherry picking".

well, Gabriel's game was cherry popping

FACT

[Coito ergo sum]

It's right in the Bible. Matthew 1. "He knew her not till she had...Jesus." The till means he knew (fucked) her afterwards. There are no complications in the birth bit, she was a healthy female.

What is it with these Catholics and Mexicans. Virgin Mary my ass.

In connection with the study of Mary during Our Lord's hidden life, we meet the questions of her perpetual virginity, of her Divine motherhood, and of her personal sanctity. Her spotless virginity has been sufficiently considered in the article on the Virgin Birth. The authorities there cited maintain that Mary remained a virgin when she conceived and gave birth to her Divine Son, as well as after the birth of Jesus. Mary's question (Luke 1:34), the angel's answer (Luke 1:35-37), Joseph's way of behaving in his doubt (Matthew 1:19-25), Christ's words addressed to the Jews (John 8:19) show that Mary retained her virginity during the conception of her Divine Son. [65]

As to Mary's virginity after her childbirth, it is not denied by St. Matthew's expressions "before they came together" (1:18), "her firstborn son" (1:25), nor by the fact that the New Testament books repeatedly refer to the "brothers of Jesus". [66] The words "before they came together" mean probably, "before they lived in the same house", referring to the time when they were merely betrothed; but even if the words be understood of marital intercourse, they only state that the Incarnation took place before any such intercourse had intervened, without implying that it did occur after the Incarnation of the Son of God. [67]

The same must be said of the expression, "and he knew her not till she brought forth her firstborn son" (Matthew 1:25); the Evangelist tells us what did not happen before the birth of Jesus, without suggesting that it happened after his birth. [68] The name "firstborn" applies to Jesus whether his mother remained a virgin or gave birth to other children after Jesus; among the Jews it was a legal name [69], so that its occurrence in the Gospel cannot astonish us.

Finally, the "brothers of Jesus" are neither the sons of Mary, nor the brothers of Our Lord in the proper sense of the word, but they are His cousins or the more or less near relatives. [70] The Church insists that in His birth the Son of God did not lessen but consecrate the virginal integrity of His mother (Secret in Mass of Purification). The Fathers express themselves in similar language concerning this privilege of Mary. [71]

http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15464b.htm

[Coito ergo sum]

duplicate

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Actually, there was no penetration according to apologists, so the guy that got Mary's cherry was her own son, the first living male to enter her vagina.

[Coito ergo sum]

Actually, there was no penetration according to apologists, so the guy that got Mary's cherry was her own son, the first living male to enter her vagina.

I thought Zeus appeared to her in the form of a goose... with a huge, throbbing Johnson....?

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Actually, there was no penetration according to apologists, so the guy that got Mary's cherry was her own son, the first living male to enter her vagina.

I thought Zeus appeared to her in the form of a goose... with a huge, throbbing Johnson....?

Huge throbbing Johnson?

[Coito ergo sum]

[Tero]

Well, the angel shit is bunk, there are no angels. The Joseph dude of the legend married a pregnant girl. He may have had kids before or after. It was his duty as a Jew. So he knew her afterwards. No idea about the siblings. They are not relevant.

[Coito ergo sum]

Well, the angel shit is bunk, there are no angels. The Joseph dude of the legend married a pregnant girl. He may have had kids before or after. It was his duty as a Jew. So he knew her afterwards. No idea about the siblings. They are not relevant.

If Mary had other sons, that would be very relevant to whether she retained her virginity.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Well, the angel shit is bunk, there are no angels. The Joseph dude of the legend married a pregnant girl. He may have had kids before or after. It was his duty as a Jew. So he knew her afterwards. No idea about the siblings. They are not relevant.

If Mary had other sons, that would be very relevant to whether she retained her virginity.

We could ask Jesus's older siblings?

[Tero]

The brothers and sisters are irrelevant in that there are issues of translation and there is no need to add characters. Only a handful of NT characters have any close connection to reality. Jesus himself is the most difficult, as there may have been a man, but the legend is ten times bigger.