And? All-loving? That's your definition.Brian Peacock wrote: ↑Fri Dec 17, 2021 1:47 amIf god is all-loving why did he invent a wasp that can only complete its life-cycle by laying its eggs in the eyeball of a mammal?
Scientific Proof Of God
-
superuniverse
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:25 pm
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
-
JimC
- The sentimental bloke
- Posts: 74134
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
- About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Yep, we know it's not your's. Your invented god is one of those hellfire and damnation delusions, believed in by people with very nasty minds indeed...superuniverse wrote: ↑Fri Dec 17, 2021 2:27 amAnd? All-loving? That's your definition.Brian Peacock wrote: ↑Fri Dec 17, 2021 1:47 amIf god is all-loving why did he invent a wasp that can only complete its life-cycle by laying its eggs in the eyeball of a mammal?
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!
And my gin!
-
Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 41028
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Because if the babbelical divine exist, it's not loving, it's a spite filled control freak, and worse.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
-
rainbow
- Posts: 13756
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:10 am
- About me: Egal wie dicht du bist, Goethe war Dichter
Where ever you are, Goethe was a Poet. - Location: Africa
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Tell us about your God, NOSTRILANUS
I call bullshit - Alfred E Einstein
BArF−4
BArF−4
-
Brian Peacock
- Tipping cows since 1946
- Posts: 39919
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
- About me: Ablate me:
- Location: Location: Location:
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
So he doesn't think his god is all-knowing, nor all-loving. So why would he think it's all-powerful? The supreme being sounds less and less supreme the longer the thread goes on.rainbow wrote:Tell us about your God, NOSTRILANUS
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
-
Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
And still no sign of a Scientific Proof Of God.Brian Peacock wrote: ↑Fri Dec 17, 2021 7:51 amSo he doesn't think his god is all-knowing, nor all-loving. So why would he think it's all-powerful? The supreme being sounds less and less supreme the longer the thread goes on.rainbow wrote:Tell us about your God, NOSTRILANUS
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
-
Scot Dutchy
- Posts: 19000
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:07 pm
- About me: Dijkbeschermer
- Location: 's-Gravenhage, Nederland
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
How about all the planets in the universe? No answer there either. His god is not very good at anything really. A waste of space tbh boyo. What does that say about the FOOLS that believe in him?
"Wat is het een gezellig boel hier".
-
superuniverse
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:25 pm
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Hermit wrote: ↑Fri Dec 17, 2021 9:18 amAnd still no sign of a Scientific Proof Of God.Brian Peacock wrote: ↑Fri Dec 17, 2021 7:51 amSo he doesn't think his god is all-knowing, nor all-loving. So why would he think it's all-powerful? The supreme being sounds less and less supreme the longer the thread goes on.rainbow wrote:Tell us about your God, NOSTRILANUS
Lol what a total moron you are...
-
superuniverse
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:25 pm
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
God is holy and cannot "love" sin.Brian Peacock wrote: ↑Fri Dec 17, 2021 7:51 amSo he doesn't think his god is all-knowing, nor all-loving. So why would he think it's all-powerful? The supreme being sounds less and less supreme the longer the thread goes on.rainbow wrote:Tell us about your God, NOSTRILANUS
As for all-knowing and all-powerful you got something right.
-
Brian Peacock
- Tipping cows since 1946
- Posts: 39919
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
- About me: Ablate me:
- Location: Location: Location:
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Tell me what distinguishes a holy being from the rest.
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
-
Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Possibly.superuniverse wrote: ↑Fri Dec 17, 2021 1:59 pmLol what a total moron you are...Hermit wrote: ↑Fri Dec 17, 2021 9:18 amAnd still no sign of a Scientific Proof Of God.Brian Peacock wrote: ↑Fri Dec 17, 2021 7:51 amSo he doesn't think his god is all-knowing, nor all-loving. So why would he think it's all-powerful? The supreme being sounds less and less supreme the longer the thread goes on.rainbow wrote:Tell us about your God, NOSTRILANUS
What is certain, though, is that you still have not provided a Scientific Proof Of God. Having started this thread over four years and more than 1700 posts ago, what does this failure make you?
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
-
superuniverse
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:25 pm
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Will a total moron understand that 2 + 2 = 4?Hermit wrote: ↑Fri Dec 17, 2021 2:31 pmPossibly.superuniverse wrote: ↑Fri Dec 17, 2021 1:59 pmLol what a total moron you are...Hermit wrote: ↑Fri Dec 17, 2021 9:18 amAnd still no sign of a Scientific Proof Of God.Brian Peacock wrote: ↑Fri Dec 17, 2021 7:51 amSo he doesn't think his god is all-knowing, nor all-loving. So why would he think it's all-powerful? The supreme being sounds less and less supreme the longer the thread goes on.rainbow wrote: Tell us about your God, NOSTRILANUS
What is certain, though, is that you still have not provided a Scientific Proof Of God. Having started this thread over four years and more than 1700 posts ago, what does this failure make you?
-
Sean Hayden
- Microagressor
- Posts: 18907
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:55 pm
- About me: recovering humanist
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Can you put it on a tortilla?Brian Peacock wrote: ↑Fri Dec 17, 2021 2:10 pmTell me what distinguishes a holy being from the rest.
meh
-
superuniverse
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:25 pm
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Lolo if Nostradamus can't convince you...
How much more this...
How much more this...
-
Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Maybe. Maybe not. But I do.superuniverse wrote: ↑Fri Dec 17, 2021 3:20 pmWill a total moron understand that 2 + 2 = 4?Hermit wrote: ↑Fri Dec 17, 2021 2:31 pmPossibly.superuniverse wrote: ↑Fri Dec 17, 2021 1:59 pmLol what a total moron you are...Hermit wrote: ↑Fri Dec 17, 2021 9:18 amAnd still no sign of a Scientific Proof Of God.Brian Peacock wrote: ↑Fri Dec 17, 2021 7:51 amSo he doesn't think his god is all-knowing, nor all-loving. So why would he think it's all-powerful? The supreme being sounds less and less supreme the longer the thread goes on.
What is certain, though, is that you still have not provided a Scientific Proof Of God. Having started this thread over four years and more than 1700 posts ago, what does this failure make you?
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests