More Evidences for God

[mandy]

How do I know that I have a REAL bank note?

ALL bank nates, both real and fake have a designer. Who designed God?

thats the point mate. the point is that fake prove their real.

Oh, and Mandy, mate. The other gods were around long before Allah. Fake bank notes came after real ones.

fake gods came after real God mate.

And there are MANY real bank notes. So by your logic there must be MANY real gods.

good thinking mate. now youre cookin.

[mandy]

Just one? Spoilsport.

Ok, here's a question:

Who killed JFK?

i say that if you didnt create matter kill him and I didn't kill him, then we can say it was [FECK] did the universe it.

See the problem?

no. where is the problem mate?
obviously you have proved my point. JFK didnt kill himself. Feck either killed him, or Feck could have killed JFK. duh.

Of course this example is actually more logical than your original, in that we can at least be certain that JFK was killed. In your case, we have no idea whether the universe was created or not, which is a premise of your statement without proof for which your statement is pointless in any case.

thats just bollocks coz science proved universe was created after big bang. so get your facts right mate. you must be living in a cave not to know what every child know by now.

http://halozone.com/appologetics/god_big_bang.shtml

And even if such proof could be found, we then hit the problem implied above.

so you do know there is proof that this massive universe was created. you did a sly one there mate.

I eagerly await your devastating reply which demonstrates why these are not fatal logic flaws and are in fact evidence of either your incredible poe-ness or your incredible credulity.

i just told you mate. if you just stop being sly and be honest then you know i got science to back my evidences for God.

[Tigger]

[Feck]

Meh Theists LOVE the big bang theory It's another bit of science they think proves a sky fairy ..... it doesn't and anyway ignorant creotards should never use science ,they are happy to trash science ,know fuck all about it's basic principles and just lose whenever they mention it . If you cannot understand the concept of evidence ,proof , theory etc then don't be bouncing around like a jack in the box all full of yourself claiming that the bang theory or the 2nd law of thermodynamics "proves " god (and as mentioned before Mandy most idiot theists choose the second law ,only you could say the First law of thermodymamics is evidence for God ).

I'm not sure I can take the blame for the Dallas shooting , Besides I don't miss

[Deep Sea Isopod]

just coz you havent seen a massive death star dont mean they dont exist. are you trying to say that no one cant make no actual death stars.

The celestial Teapot analogy springs to mind.

whats that then? do you reckon some teacup is gonna prove my third evidence wrong? id love to hear that one.

If I were to suggest that between the Earth and Mars there is a china teapot revolving about the sun in an elliptical orbit, nobody would be able to disprove my assertion provided I were careful to add that the teapot is too small to be revealed even by our most powerful telescopes. But if I were to go on to say that, since my assertion cannot be disproved, it is an intolerable presumption on the part of human reason to doubt it, I should rightly be thought to be talking nonsense. If, however, the existence of such a teapot were affirmed in ancient books, taught as the sacred truth every Sunday, and instilled into the minds of children at school, hesitation to believe in its existence would become a mark of eccentricity and entitle the doubter to the attentions of the psychiatrist in an enlightened age or of the Inquisitor in an earlier time.

In other words, because we can't disprove the Death Star you can claim it's true? But Bertrand Russell is claiming that a china teapot is orbitting the sun. So if you can't disprove it, it must be true, right?
Wrong. You are making the claim, so the onus is on you to prove your hypothesis. This is the point of the celestial teapot analogy.
So you must now prove the Death Star exists.


In yer own time.

[Magicziggy]

I think we could be missing some of the subtlety in our mate mandy.

[A Monkey Shaved]

There is no more evidence for the existence of God because there has never been any evidence in the first place. There are plenty of arguments for the existence of God, the Teleological argument and the Ontological argument to name just a few but no evidence whatsoever. Those arguments are just a load of gas bagging which even had me sucked in for a while but I came the conclusion those argument really lacked substance and were just that "arguments" not evidence.

[Pappa]

There is no more evidence for the existence of God because there has never been any evidence in the first place. There are plenty of arguments for the existence of God, the Teleological argument and the Ontological argument to name just a few but no evidence whatsoever. Those arguments are just a load of gas bagging which even had me sucked in for a while but I came the conclusion those argument really lacked substance and were just that "arguments" not evidence.

Wrong!

As Mandy has pointed out, the shaggability of Cheryl Cole is clear evidence of the existence of god.

[mandy]

A Monkey Shaved:

There is no more evidence for the existence of God because there has never been any evidence in the first place. There are plenty of arguments for the existence of God, the Teleological argument and the Ontological argument to name just a few but no evidence whatsoever. Those arguments are just a load of gas bagging which even had me sucked in for a while but I came the conclusion those argument really lacked substance and were just that "arguments" not evidence.

you are just playing words games, monkey mate. that aint not the way to use no intellect.
all you are saying is you werent convinced by the evidence in those arguments. thats all.
evidence is like a woman. if you like her, you like her. if you dont, you dont, even if she chases you all year around.

[mandy]

Mandy most idiot theists choose the second law ,only you could say the First law of thermodymamics is evidence for God

thanks mate. it is, if you actually think about it. but come on feck, there is no need to say that only thick men believe in entropy. its just that they often buy into bollocks..

[mandy]

In other words, because we can't disprove the Death Star you can claim it's true?
But Bertrand Russell is claiming that a china teapot is orbitting the sun. So if you can't disprove it, it must be true, right?

when did i say this. please dont spin the tea cup just coz youre feeling dizzy. women are watching. speak sense mate. i didnt say death stars exist. we havent seen a fake one yet. if you remember it was our chap klr who said his death star is a fake death star. he was chatting bollocks. he hasnt yet even shown me no fake death star. klr just got a prop from hollywood.

You are making the claim, so the onus is on you to prove your hypothesis. This is the point of the celestial teapot analogy.

So you must now prove the Death Star exists.

In yer own time.

excuse me mate, i dont have to prove nothing. you are the one who brought in the tea. if you want me drink your tea then tell me about it. i aint gonna swallow everything just coz you do.

[A Monkey Shaved]

A Monkey Shaved:

There is no more evidence for the existence of God because there has never been any evidence in the first place. There are plenty of arguments for the existence of God, the Teleological argument and the Ontological argument to name just a few but no evidence whatsoever. Those arguments are just a load of gas bagging which even had me sucked in for a while but I came the conclusion those argument really lacked substance and were just that "arguments" not evidence.

you are just playing words games, monkey mate. that aint not the way to use no intellect.
all you are saying is you werent convinced by the evidence in those arguments. thats all.
evidence is like a woman. if you like her, you like her. if you dont, you dont, even if she chases you all year around.

I see no evidence whatsoever in those arguments The problem is that it happens to be arguments, not evidence that frequently ends up in war

[Svartalf]

^^^^ fuck you mean The organ of Grammar is the foreskin

Maybe his was, but that's a freak mutations, Jews are usually excellent writers and speakers.

[Svartalf]

^ Between circumcision and education levels, I mean.

Interesting... does anybody know of sources for the education levels of Jewish women in the Maghreb, Near and Middle East, and Ultraorthodox communities?

[Feck]

Mandy most idiot theists choose the second law ,only you could say the First law of thermodymamics is evidence for God

thanks mate. it is, if you actually think about it. but come on feck, there is no need to say that only thick men believe in entropy. its just that they often buy into bollocks..

what see what mean about staying well away from science Mandy ?