
Richard Dawkins- rationalist or religious nut?
Re: Richard Dawkins- rationalist or religious nut?

Outside the ordered universe is that amorphous blight of nethermost confusion which blasphemes and bubbles at the center of all infinity—the boundless daemon sultan Azathoth, whose name no lips dare speak aloud, and who gnaws hungrily in inconceivable, unlighted chambers beyond time and space amidst the muffled, maddening beating of vile drums and the thin monotonous whine of accursed flutes.
Code: Select all
// Replaces with spaces the braces in cases where braces in places cause stasis
$str = str_replace(array("\{","\}")," ",$str);
- hadespussercats
- I've come for your pants.
- Posts: 18586
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:27 am
- About me: Looks pretty good, coming out of the back of his neck like that.
- Location: Gotham
- Contact:
Re: Richard Dawkins- rationalist or religious nut?
Jonesboy wrote:Richard Dawkins doctrines, all of them, are religious doctrines dressed up. His not-so-new religion is designed to appeal to atheists and science nerds.Read and be amazed! :
Dawkins believes that life, in its essence, is flawed or selfish.
Just like the Church.
The Church believes that life, in its essence, is flawed or originally sinful. Strike one.
Dawkins believes that genes survive.
Just like the Church.
The Church believes that people survive. Dawkins calls it copying, the Church calls it reincarnation. But nothing survives death. Strike two.
Dawkins believes in favoured forms - survival of the fittest.
Just like the Church.
The Church believes in favoured forms - the lineage of the prophets. Strike three.
Dawkins believes that evolved structures - Dawkin's designoids, are forms.
Just like the Church.
The Church believes that evolved structures - God's designs, are forms. Strike four.
Dawkins believes that without Dawkinian altruistic intervention we are blind machines.
Just like the Church.
The Church believes that without Jesus' altruistic intervention we are blind machines. Strike five.
Richard Dawkins? rationalist? More like the worlds biggest religious fraud.
Richard will later be on display for his followers, pickled by his beloved Church in a specimen bottle, where he can be seen slowly fermenting, bubbling, blackening, and decaying. Strike six...

The green careening planet
spins blindly in the dark
so close to annihilation.
Listen. No one listens. Meow.
spins blindly in the dark
so close to annihilation.
Listen. No one listens. Meow.
- Bella Fortuna
- Sister Golden Hair
- Posts: 79685
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
- About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require. - Location: Scotlifornia
- Contact:
Re: Richard Dawkins- rationalist or religious nut?

Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/
Re: Richard Dawkins- rationalist or religious nut?
Great News. Where's the party?Ayaan wrote:The OP will have more time to spend here - he's already banned at atheistforums.org.
Hello, Jonesby. I think you'll find most folks around here aren't really followers of Dawkins.
Re: Richard Dawkins- rationalist or religious nut?
So you're not an atheist and you don't want to refute it, or you're an atheist and you don't want to refute it? put me right.Feck wrote:Well that was stunning wasn't it ? Glad I'm not anAtheist because right now I'd have to frantically try and refute that insightful post
What the hell has atheism got to do with Dawkins anyway? He's a religious nut. That's what I was told.
Re: Richard Dawkins- rationalist or religious nut?
yeh.Zombie Gawdzilla wrote:
Re: Richard Dawkins- rationalist or religious nut?
Explanation given. :doorstop.Rob wrote:Explanation required. :deadpan:Richard Dawkins's approach to religion is religiously motivated
Re: Richard Dawkins- rationalist or religious nut?
Audley Strange wrote:This seems like someone watched Adam Curtis' "All watched over by Machines of Loving Grace." Heard Curtis' gag about Dawkins reinventing the concept of the soul through the transfer of information through the immortal D.N.A. and ran with it without getting the joke or the entire point of Curtis' show.
(And Pokemon computer games are logic based, nothing in the big book of bullshit comes even close to being so elegantly designed, shit though such games may be.)
Curtis put it exactly. Did you get it?
Re: Richard Dawkins- rationalist or religious nut?
You better believe it. Pray for it.Dries van Tonder wrote:Oh boy, you're being trolled by a master![]()
I am unsurpassed in argument. I've done you over countless times before. You try to cross swords with me and you WILL come off worse.
The best that anyone can hope for here is a ban against me- and that's a win. For me.
Re: Richard Dawkins- rationalist or religious nut?
I will break your bones and sip your blood from your skull cap. Then you may go on your merry way.Robert_S wrote:On good days I am like a gar. Taking the bait, swimming about about, playing with the angler, fighting and getting reeled in and even lifted out of the water... then spitting out the bait and hook and swimming on my merry way.charlou wrote:Since people troll themselves, I would agree.Dries van Tonder wrote:Oh boy, you're being trolled by a master![]()
Re: Richard Dawkins- rationalist or religious nut?
Yes. Dawkins doctrines are an outcry against his rape.Feck wrote:When he says 'The Church' can we assume he means the holy roman pederasts ?
Re: Richard Dawkins- rationalist or religious nut?
Yeh. Come on Chuck. We need you. They need you for support, and I need someone to tear to shreds. You can do both jobs at once.Dries van Tonder wrote:Seems that Chuck has chosen to retreat![]()
Re: Richard Dawkins- rationalist or religious nut?
Dear wollly savoury,Audley Strange wrote:No not really, but then when the rudamentary belief that shapes your behaviour is so erroneous, all that comes after is boud to be a fucking disaster.Zombie Gawdzilla wrote:So the creatards got that wrong too. No surprise there, is it?Audley Strange wrote:(And Pokemon computer games are logic based, nothing in the big book of bullshit comes even close to being so elegantly designed, shit though such games may be.)
Where the hell did you read THAT!
Dull, predictable, staid.
Re: Richard Dawkins- rationalist or religious nut?
You started all this. Now you ask what's going on? Are you, like INVISIBLE?Psychoserenity wrote:'Ello, 'ello, 'ello, - what's going on 'ere then?
You will be shot on sight.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests