The trick is to learn from your past mistakes.Halogenetic wrote:I bet there isn't a forum out there that wouldn't get protective over the use of "their" URL, never mind the agreeable objective of the project. Big fucking yawn. If the url linked to this thread everybody would see that the flyers are not official rationalia communications, if that's the concern and it's not just timid cliquey protectionism which is preventing people affirming the use of the url.
Thanks for the link; I'll see what they say there then. Maybe you're right and I should stop asking thoughSanta_Claus wrote: for a forum to link to - how about the Flying Spaghetti monster forum - a clean looking URL. http://www.venganza.org. Been a few years since I was on - they were way too nice to the religious folks.......but that might fit in to your strategy. Set up your own Facebook page or use someone else's - bound to be a few FSM ones already by now.
Where are you going to be distributing?
Because we aren't a organization that promotes atheism. We are just a group of people who happen to have being atheists in common. If you really feel like you should put a forum on it but Ratskep.Halogenetic wrote:Why?Twoflower wrote: I'd be really uncomfortable having our name on the flyer.
You must write TLDR a lot on this forum.Twoflower wrote:Also it was too wordy to keep my attention, try to cut it down to just a few sentences.
Sir Figg Newton wrote:If I have seen further than others, it is only because I am surrounded by midgets.
IDMD2Cormac wrote:Doom predictors have been with humans right through our history. They are like the proverbial stopped clock - right twice a day, but not due to the efficacy of their prescience.
Ratskep is the same though - it's not an atheist site. There tends to be a predominantly atheist membership there, but it's not part of the goals or aims of the forum and religious affiliation isn't a prerequisite for intelligent discussion.Twoflower wrote:Because we aren't a organization that promotes atheism. We are just a group of people who happen to have being atheists in common. If you really feel like you should put a forum on it but Ratskep.Halogenetic wrote:Why?Twoflower wrote: I'd be really uncomfortable having our name on the flyer.
You must write TLDR a lot on this forum.Twoflower wrote:Also it was too wordy to keep my attention, try to cut it down to just a few sentences.
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS ABSOLUTE MORALITY.Halogenetic wrote:Mohammed preferred young girls
I'm sure he could with adequate lube.Sælir wrote:There is no way Jeebus could take Chuch Norris
But Rat Skep is no more an atheist organisation either. And quite a few of us are members over there too.Twoflower wrote:Because we aren't a organization that promotes atheism. We are just a group of people who happen to have being atheists in common. If you really feel like you should put a forum on it but Ratskep.Halogenetic wrote:Why?Twoflower wrote: I'd be really uncomfortable having our name on the flyer.
and Jeebus ain't my bossSælir wrote:There is no way Jeebus could take Chuch Norris
I'm not a member there and I was just thinking they are more serious then we are and might be more welcome to it, but if not then it shouldn't be used either.Mr.Samsa wrote:Ratskep is the same though - it's not an atheist site. There tends to be a predominantly atheist membership there, but it's not part of the goals or aims of the forum and religious affiliation isn't a prerequisite for intelligent discussion.Twoflower wrote:Because we aren't a organization that promotes atheism. We are just a group of people who happen to have being atheists in common. If you really feel like you should put a forum on it but Ratskep.Halogenetic wrote:Why?Twoflower wrote: I'd be really uncomfortable having our name on the flyer.
You must write TLDR a lot on this forum.Twoflower wrote:Also it was too wordy to keep my attention, try to cut it down to just a few sentences.
I am a member of both and can confirm that when I am over there I am more serious - even though I feel safer here . . .Twoflower wrote: I'm not a member there and I was just thinking they are more serious then we are
It would be the other way aroundXamonas Chegwé wrote:I'm sure he could with adequate lube.Sælir wrote:There is no way Jeebus could take Chuch Norris
Jesus only does hand jobs. "love your neighbour as you love yourself" and all that.Sælir wrote:It would be the other way aroundXamonas Chegwé wrote:I'm sure he could with adequate lube.Sælir wrote:There is no way Jeebus could take Chuch Norris
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests
