You're playing with words. I would need more evidence to determine if a five year old girl should have an ABORTION.Gawdzilla wrote: You need MORE evidence to determine if a five year old girl should have a baby?
.
You're playing with words. I would need more evidence to determine if a five year old girl should have an ABORTION.Gawdzilla wrote: You need MORE evidence to determine if a five year old girl should have a baby?
The obverse of having an abortion for a pregnant five year old would be to have the baby. What's hard about that concept?mistermack wrote:You're playing with words. I would need more evidence to determine if a five year old girl should have an ABORTION.Gawdzilla wrote: You need MORE evidence to determine if a five year old girl should have a baby?
.
Well, if you said "an already pregnant five year old", then it would have been more honest and accurate.Gawdzilla wrote: The obverse of having an abortion for a pregnant five year old would be to have the baby. What's hard about that concept?
It would help if you starting composing your answer AFTER you read what's posted.mistermack wrote:Well, if you said "an already pregnant five year old", then it would have been more honest and accurate.Gawdzilla wrote: The obverse of having an abortion for a pregnant five year old would be to have the baby. What's hard about that concept?
You're not deciding if its a good or bad thing for her to get pregnant, you're deciding whether to intervene with an abortion, or not.
.
I do my best, guv.Gawdzilla wrote: It would help if you starting composing your answer AFTER you read what's posted.
Whenever I screw up that badly I feel like a total fool.mistermack wrote:I do my best, guv.Gawdzilla wrote: It would help if you starting composing your answer AFTER you read what's posted.
.
Yeh, but you're used to it.Gawdzilla wrote: Whenever I screw up that badly I feel like a total fool.
From you, yes.mistermack wrote:Yeh, but you're used to it.Gawdzilla wrote: Whenever I screw up that badly I feel like a total fool.
.
Yes it fucking would be as dangerous. She's a five year old girl.mistermack wrote:It's clear cut, if the EVIDENCE is clear cut. I would have said the same, before I read this. I actually have doubts about this case, even though it's presented as fact.The Mad Hatter wrote:
I believe it's very clear cut.
Even presuming this happened today, the medical risk would simply be too large. Either the mother or child would lose their life, and most likely both. In this case, you have a duty to protect the life of the mother.
But if it's true, it's evidence that it wouldn't be as dangerous as you might imagine. In a modern hospital, it wouldn't be as dangerous as it was in 1939.
You'd have to examine a number of cases, and their outcomes, to declare that it was likely to kill the girl.
.
You seem determined to see everything as black or white, even when it obviously isn't.The Mad Hatter wrote: Yes it fucking would be as dangerous. She's a five year old girl.
But don't let medical science get in the way.
You have trouble distinguishing between an acorn and a full grown oak tree, don't you?mistermack wrote:You seem determined to see everything as black or white, even when it obviously isn't.The Mad Hatter wrote: Yes it fucking would be as dangerous. She's a five year old girl.
But don't let medical science get in the way.
Childbirth fucking IS dangerous, especially to a five year old girl, or to a fifty year old woman.
This girl was faced with two dangerous operations, an abortion or a caesarian. I don't know which was the safest, and it's pretty clear that you don't either.
It could be that caesarian was the safest option anyway, and the choice was just down to when to do it.
Like I said, I wouldn't impose my own opinions, I would leave it to the family and the doctors.
.
No, sorry, wrong again. I have no trouble with that at all.Gawdzilla wrote: You have trouble distinguishing between an acorn and a full grown oak tree, don't you?
Well, put a bit more thought into it then.Gawdzilla wrote: Whenever I screw up that badly I feel like a total fool.
Why should I be held to a different standard than you?mistermack wrote:No, sorry, wrong again. I have no trouble with that at all.Gawdzilla wrote: You have trouble distinguishing between an acorn and a full grown oak tree, don't you?Sorry to break this to you, but you do.Gawdzilla wrote:Well, put a bit more thought into it then.Whenever I screw up that badly I feel like a total fool.
.
As she was 9, I'm thinking he was muslim.Coito ergo sum wrote:Soooooo.....the church wants to excommunicate the mother.....but, the stepfather who raped a 9 year old girl - no mention of whether he gets excommunicated....
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests