macdoc wrote:It's a job Seth not a skydaddy calling like some swallow hook line and sinker and try to peddle to others cut the shaming crap ....it's so puerile...

I see, situational ethics it is.
•••
I have zero tolerance for memes that have been proven time and again to do damage and promote divisions amongst people and even households.
Interestly, I believe that the very reason that religion remains such a strong human meme is for precisely the opposite reason: that it promotes unity and assists people and populations in living together in harmony. Of course, it may be somewhat unpleasant for outsiders, but that's evolutionarily beside the point.
Strangely enough this article just came out today
Analytical thinking erodes belief in God
Charles Darwin and Albert Einstein famously did not believe in a supernatural God, and neither do some scientists today. It now appears there may be a good reason for this: thinking analytically dims supernatural beliefs, apparently by opposing the intuitive thought processes that underpin them.
The vast majority of people believe in a supernatural god or gods, says social psychologist Ara Norenzayan of the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, Canada. Yet there are hundreds of thousands of atheists and agnostics who do not. While scientists have begun to study the psychology of belief, we know little about what causes disbelief.
Humans use two separate cognitive systems for processing information: one that is fast, emotional and intuitive, and another that is slower and more analytical.
continues...
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn2 ... n-god.html
[/quote]
The question is, of course, whether analytical thinking that erodes belief in God is evolutionarily beneficial or harmful. Only time will tell I suppose, but given the 6000 or so years religion has endured as a meme, I'd speculate that atheism is going to come up holding the shit end of the stick when it comes to survival of the fittest. This of course fits with my hypothesis that increasing intelligence is only evolutionarily beneficial up to a certain point, and that beyond that point it becomes highly detrimental to the species and will probably result in the destruction of at least the overly-analytical and overly-intelligent of the species in favor of the "just dumb enough" majority.
Given the relative birth rates in highly technological societies and more primitive ones, I'd say this hypothesis has some legs.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.