Chuck Jones wrote:In monotheistic religions, god is god. That means that I could tell a christian that god is one thing, and instead of saying "that's your god. Our god is not like that", they'll say "no, god is like this...". So in those religions, they don't believe in one god over others, they just believe in one god. When I say god, I mean god, and when someone in one of those religions says it, they mean the same. And if you ask a muslim if god is the same god of christianity they'll say yes, and vice versa. Yahweh is Allah. Attributing different characteristics to god doesn't mean it's a different god, it just means disagreement on the same god's attibutes.
...that's because Christians think there is only one god, and the rest have it wrong, and Muslims believe in one god and the rest have it wrong. Yes. It's like saying "I believe in One God, the Brother Almighty, Housekeeper of Heaven and Earth, With A Priapic Phallus." Is that "the same god, but a different idea of what he's like" or a "different god?" It's just semantics. I'm describing something different than "God the father almighty, maker of heaven and Earth..."
Chuck Jones wrote:
The difference between me and most people in religions is that whereas they would believe that god created the universe out of nothing, and is separate from it, I believe that the universe can be likened to the material body of god, and god is the mind of the universe. In panentheism, god is simultaneously both the universe, and also that which causes the universe to manifest. Also, in panentheism, god doesn't need to intervene in the universe since god is the universe. If you think about it, being the creator of something must necessarily mean being the thing created.
Fair enough - sounds like the Force.
But, I don't think that being the creator of something must necessarily mean being the thing created. I make a pie for dessert - doesn't make me the pie.
Feck, sorry mate. Let's put it all behind us.