The problem is the presumption that life is rational. Give it up. Then you see that it's not other people who are stupid. They know what they want and they don't have to have reasons. That's living.Gawdzilla wrote:The Science of Why We Don't Believe Science
The pointlesness of trying to support religion with science.
Re: The pointlesness of trying to support religion with scie
- Thumpalumpacus
- Posts: 1357
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 6:13 pm
- About me: Texan by birth, musician by nature, writer by avocation, freethinker by inclination.
- Contact:
Re: The pointlesness of trying to support religion with scie
Because sex is humanity at its most uncontrolled, most animalistic, sweatiest, I-don't-give-a-fuck-about-religionest best; and because it is an almost undeniable urge.egbert wrote:camoguard wrote:I can't easily say all male circumcisions aren't for purposes of desexualization. But I can say that rites of passage rituals are done to acknowledge masculinity and maturity in boys. I think in the boneheaded ways of the ignorant, Most parents are just doing what was done to them as a way to say "ata boy". I think it's mutilation by negligence in a way.Feck wrote:
Wasn't arguing that one was better than the other and female circumcision is FUCKING horrific ( I wouldn't want to beat the shit out of a parent if they said they had circumcised a boy and I would a girl ) but female circumcision is not just the removal of the clitoris ,and in fact it is the other things that are done that makes it a serious (ly harmful) procedure . And I would disagree that circumcision of boys is not meant to de-sexualize them .
Why do the religious nutbars have this obsession that REALLY bothers them - the notion that somewhere, someone else is ENJOYING sex, and they MUST put a stop to it.
To be able to make people feel guilty about what is after all a biological drive -- to make them feel guilty for being human, fer chrissakes -- is a potent lever of power. The priest is assured a line at the confessional, and a full donation bowl.
these are things we think we know
these are feelings we might even share
these are thoughts we hide from ourselves
these are secrets we cannot lay bare.
these are feelings we might even share
these are thoughts we hide from ourselves
these are secrets we cannot lay bare.
Re: The pointlesness of trying to support religion with scie
Now that I know more about it, I know this is the underlying reason for male circumcision in many cases, but not all. In my case and that of the in-laws who persuaded me at the time, it was two things: hygiene and the importance of 'looking like dad'. I was naive enough to accept those as practical reasons and allow it to happen to my first son.Feck wrote:And I would disagree that circumcision of boys is not meant to de-sexualize them .

I was unaware at the time, but have come to understand since, that even if the rationale for circumcision has nothing to do with sex on the surface of it (hygiene, rite of passage, like father like son, etc), fundamentally it does. Also, I now know a consequence of circumcision is reduced sexual pleasure and function, for both the owner of the penis, and for his partner/s. There are deeper social and psychological ramefications that are complex and extensive, I think.
I was involved in the lengthy debate about circumcision at RDF a couple of years ago, arguing alongside LP against it. I said to her at the time, and still think, she should write a book, such is the extent of her knowledge, enthusiasm and skilled articulation of the subject.
no fences
- camoguard
- The ferret with a microphone
- Posts: 873
- Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 11:59 pm
- About me: I'm very social and philosophically ambitious. Also, I'm chatty and enjoy getting to meet new people on or offline. I think I'm talented in writing and rapping. We'll see.
- Location: Tennessee
- Contact:
Re: The pointlesness of trying to support religion with scie
That's what I think happened to me and to the firstborns of several coworkers of mine. It may have started as a way to control people but the motivation of modern parents is more benign. It still sucks though. People should still learn to leave their kids alone in that regard.
Re: The pointlesness of trying to support religion with scie
Yes ... Ignorance and naivete, stubborn adherence to traditional notions, etc, do not good decisions make.camoguard wrote:People should still learn to leave their kids alone in that regard.
no fences
Re: The pointlesness of trying to support religion with scie
If it's being done for the GLORY of God, what's the problem?Thumpalumpacus wrote:Are you out of your mind, wanting to ask a woman what she thinks about a guy hacking up her genitalia?charlou wrote:Likewise, thumpa.![]()
Gallstones wrote:What if this was a rite of passage?
WARNING: Not for the faint of heartTrigger Warning!!!1! :
Is it a greater or lessor mutilation than female circumcision?
Ask the victim?
I don't think it's an either/or thing.
''The only way to reduce the number of nuclear weapons is to use them.''
—Rush Limbaugh
—Rush Limbaugh
- camoguard
- The ferret with a microphone
- Posts: 873
- Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 11:59 pm
- About me: I'm very social and philosophically ambitious. Also, I'm chatty and enjoy getting to meet new people on or offline. I think I'm talented in writing and rapping. We'll see.
- Location: Tennessee
- Contact:
Re: The pointlesness of trying to support religion with scie
If God isn't going to offer me one of his orifices, it's a big problem. He said I have to clip it before I stick it and I'm ready for some God sex.
Re: The pointlesness of trying to support religion with scie
camoguard wrote:If God isn't going to offer me one of his orifices, it's a big problem. He said I have to clip it before I stick it and I'm ready for some God sex.
no fences
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests