Blyton was of her time. The stories were a cracking read for children but were riddled with class assumptions, and casual racism and sexism, but each generation of parents rereads the stories that were read to them when they were children and addg some more into the mix with their own kids - and things move on. Blyton's books are not a political manual.
Over time books might be subtly edited here or there or dropped from the catalogue, as we've seen with Roald Dahl and Dr Seuss recently. So what? Enid Blyton as an individual was a bit if a nightmare with some racist opinions that went beyond the casual norms of her time. Pointing this out or acknowledging is doesn't amount to cancelling her or her work, nor does it make everyone who read or listened to those stories a racist - and they shouldn't feel affronted by it or presume they're being accused of being something they're not.
And yet those sensitive souls on the Right do feel affronted, and outraged, as if the mere mention of some problematic elements in Blyton's work or views is an attack in everything they hold dear and sacred - an attack on a beloved British literary icon; an attack on their ("our") identity as right-thinking British patriots.
My question to the
#OUTRAGED is: why is the pointing out of a bit of historical racism so offensive to you, and what do you think tour objection to the pointing out of some historical racism communicates to society about your own views on race and racism today?