AmeriKKKa

[Sean Hayden]

Okay, maybe a little. But you know what I mean.

[Hermit]

Daggles, you don't reply to my posts much because you are getting sick of being shot down in flames every time you come in here with another piece of fake news you gullibly picked up from Parler, Gab and whatever site or vlogger whose bias harmonises with yours.

And the nerve of accusing me of swerving when you refuse to even read my posts, let alone reply to them.

Still no answer, huh?

I answered. Several times. You just did not like my replies.

[Cunt]

I must have missed it. C'est la vie

[rainbow]

I must have missed it. C'est la vie

...so what's this story about Parlour falling apart over internal censorship?

[Cunt]

I must have missed it. C'est la vie

...so what's this story about Parlour falling apart over internal censorship?

The story is told by Matze, and a different story by one of Parlers owners.

Gab is being torn up over censorship, too. I don't think an online forum can stand behind free speech. Most people certainly can't.

[JimC]

I don't think an online forum can stand behind free speech. Most people certainly can't.

Given that you seem to see free speech as an absolute, it is no surprise that most people or forums, quite sensibly, won't stand behind your purist version.

[macdoc]

the ultimate "free speech" domain



some don't understand the soci in society.

[Cunt]

I don't think an online forum can stand behind free speech. Most people certainly can't.

Given that you seem to see free speech as an absolute, it is no surprise that most people or forums, quite sensibly, won't stand behind your purist version.

Not an absolute at all.

Censorship is the management everyone wants. For me though, I prefer to be in charge of what I can and can't read. Facebook 'censoring' an idea isn't bad at all.

Facebook, Alphabet, Amazon, Apple and Grindr all censoring the same idea or person at the same time?

That doesn't sit so comfy with me, being that I don't hold stock in any of them.

[Brian Peacock]

Meh. Being a shitty asshole is a private matter. Once you you venture out in public to engage in shitty assholery it becomes a public matter. The fact that you might feel entitled to be a shitty asshole about something doesnt give you a free pass to rub your opinion over all and sundry.

[Cunt]

Is it the organized corporate team (fecesbook et al) who are the assholes you mention as a 'private matter venturing out into public'? Or is it the people who get censored that are the assholes?

(I guess it could be both...)

[JimC]

The censorship on social media has mostly been to do with material that advocates violent overthrow of governments, or hate speech directed at jews, blacks, etc.

I'm sure there is still plenty of room for people arguing for a conservative point of view without the above...

[Cunt]

The censorship on social media has mostly been to do with material that advocates violent overthrow of governments, or hate speech directed at jews, blacks, etc.

I'm sure there is still plenty of room for people arguing for a conservative point of view without the above...

Crowder has the biggest conservative show on social media. Do you know his opinions on it? Or have his arguments not had 'plenty of room' on your chosen platforms?

[pErvinalia]

Why don't you summarise his arguments and make a defensible point? Oh, that's right, you are only here to "ask questions".

[Joe]

I never heard of this Crowder guy until Cunt started worshiping following him, but I don't spend a lot of time on social media. Anybody else ever heard of him before that?

[Cunt]

Why don't you summarise his arguments and make a defensible point? Oh, that's right, you are only here to "ask questions".

Because I'm not trying to argue with you. I think it would be unpleasant. Why don't you see if you disagree with him, or if you enjoy his shows?

Oh, that's right, you are only here for the 'Cunt Show'.

Thanks, man. It's flattering to be hotter than Crowder.