Cunt wrote: ↑Mon Aug 23, 2021 9:05 pm
Brian Peacock wrote: ↑Mon Aug 23, 2021 8:29 pm
Cunt wrote:Seabass wrote: ↑Mon Aug 23, 2021 6:48 pm
Bullshit. It's not that you don't want to, it's that you can't. Not without admitting your racism anyway.
Impotent troll likes trolling impotently.
If you weren't an impotent coward, you would invite me to see your discussion of your notions among people who honestly disagree with you. Of course, you are welcome to keep trolling after me. Impotently. It's a bit less funny every time you repeat it, but you do you.
Hmmm. You raise an issue and then say that others are impotent because you don't want to talk about it.
Not quite. I declined to talk about it earlier. Calling his tactics impotent trolling is because he refuses to let up about his precious statistics.
Hmmm. You said a thing - it was a claim. You stated that something didn't mean what someone else thought it meant. But asking you what the thing means is characterised as impotent cowardice. And apparently Seabass is now supposed to validate their questions by allowing you to watch them debate 'people who honestly disagree' with being antifascist and antiracists. But you disagree with that too don't you? Does this mean you dishonestly disagree with Seabass or that you just don't have the courage to disagree out loud, anonymously, on the internet? Who's the coward here exactly eh?
I've never argued with his. Coincidentally, I also don't argue with others who push racism backed by statistics.
Hmmm. Now you claim that someone asking you what you meant by that thing you claimed is someone pushing racism - and we know that only racists push racism. Hermit's stats were a perfect invitation for you to explain what they really mean, but although you say the stats don't mean what they appear to show you don't have the courage to say exactly why or how?
My position is to treat people as individuals first, rather than classifying them by their immutable characteristics.
Hmmm. Now it seems that asking you what you meant by that thing you said is somebody else classifying people by 'their immutable characteristics' - like skin colour one presumes. Again, you seem to think that the stats Hermit provided about the economic disparities between people in the US is kind of racisty, because those groups have different characteristics - like skin colour. Do you think that acknowledging the fact of someone's skin colour is racist? You certainly seem to. So I guess that acknowledging the fact of an immutable characteristic like a disability would makes someone ableist too, and acknowledging the fact of a persons age would be ageist, and acknowledging the fact of a person's gender would be sexist? eh?
Very Brave Sir Robin.
I'll be happy to talk a bit more about this if you can tell me who my current avatar image is and why she's one of the most important people in human history.
No need, I'm not interested in your avatar, or why you think it is important.
Get interested in building things, rather than accusing others of racism, and we might find interesting things to talk about.
But I'm afraid you're the one saying that highlighting facts about the economic disparities between people in the US, while apparently not meaning what it appears to show, is racist. Just like you call the Black Historian who wrote a book called 'How To Be An Antiracist' racist. Just like you call the people who don't want to see nazi flags paraded down their high streets by a mob chanting 'Jews will not replace us' fascists. Just like you call the person who asks you to explain what you meant an impotent coward.
You clearly like to say these things and hang them out there for all to see - as if they're self-evident, or as real as skid marks on cotton. But these things aren't the kind of things that people normally say to each other. In fact, very few people would say these kinds of things and actually mean it. If you don't mean what you say then you're just high-level-trolling for sport, and what kind of person does that for amusement? Have you not tried wanking? If you actually do mean these things then what? People are supposed to suck it up and respect your opinions because 'free speech rules' or something? Fuck that shit. You can have any opinion you like but you don't get to veto other people's opinion about it.
I'm not surprised you don't recognise my avatar or how important she has been in your life. Nor am I surprised that you're not even interested enough to ask. I only mention it so that you can tell whatever Signal or Telegram groups you're hooked into that you were banned from the forum for not knowing who Ada Lovelace was.