There is no such thing as 'proper scientific fact'. Science does its best with incomplete data. Those that put the regulations together have to know that new information may become available, and that they might need to revise their advice.Scot Dutchy wrote: ↑Wed Jul 08, 2020 5:57 amWhy the insult Sean? My beef is about inconsistent regulations that are politically motivated without proper scientific fact. We are not in the mess you lot are in or anywhere near it. So I object strongly to my name being associated with it. I have reported your post btw.
I wouldn't say that it is politically motivated, beyond that they are doing the best job within their competencies. Yes, they get it wrong. That is better than being pig-headed and sticking to regulations that no longer fit the best treatment strategies.