Brian Peacock wrote: ↑Fri Dec 30, 2022 5:59 pm
Cunt wrote:Brian Peacock wrote: ↑Fri Dec 30, 2022 5:32 pm
Cunt wrote:More oldtwitter bias.
https://twitter.com/againstgrmrs/status ... 6403131393
BREAKING: New Twitter files reveal that before
@elonmusk
took over, our account was on a BLACKLIST.
We always knew this was the case, especially since we were unjustly suspended twice, but now there’s proof.
Twitter protected groomers and punished those trying to protect kids.
The gays are infighting. How will the rainbow mafia decide which ones are anti-LGBTQAIP++?
If you're a TERF group whi broadcast the opinion that trans people are child abusers and recognising the human rights of trans people is a threat to the well-being of children, then of course you're going to think that being banned is 'protecting groomers and punished those trying to protect kids' - because you've already decided that you're the hero and that trans people are an evil to be defeated. It's a self-reinforcing story. So what was this group actually posting, eh?
I've not seen much from either group. The 'Gays Against Groomers' was mentioned in a few news casts, and pointed out a weird thing. When people try to lump groomers in with all gays, by saying that attacking groomers was attacking gays, it is more an insult to the gays, than a defense of anything.
Now you seem to be making the same mistake by lumping all trans people with some groomers who are being accused.
If you want to know what they were actually posting, it should be easy to find (now that they are unbanned). You could surely find evidence of them being haters, if it's there. If, alternately, you don't find anything of the kind, I'll assume you satisfied yourself that they were indeed just singling out groomers, rather than all trans people.
Everybody is against child sexual abuse and grooming, so that's not the issue (not counting child abusers there of course). The issues are claims that trans people are a significant risk to children at large.
Who made that claim?
I was waiting for you to bring evidence of such a claim made by 'Gays Against Groomers'.
So the logic of such an argument goes like this:
- Premise 1: Everybody is against child sexual abuse and grooming
- Premise 2: Trans people are child sexual abusers and groomers
- Conclusion: Therefore, everybody is against trans people
There's two questions that follow from this:
1. Are the premises true, because if they aren't then the conclusion must be false?
Obviously not. I don't know why you would make them, since they have nothing to do with 'gays against groomers' as far as I see from your evidence.
2. Why are you promoting the arguments of trans exclusionary activists here and then goading others by explicitly stating that someone taking issue with premise 2 (me) is making exactly the same argument as the TERF group quoted and "lumping all trans people with some groomers who are being accused"?
Who are the trans exclusionary activists?
You still haven't shown any from Gays Against Groomers. Maybe it's there, but so far you are expecting me to believe they are 'trans exclusionary activists' when all I see is that they are against exposing children to kink stuff.
If you want to lump all trans people in with groomers, that's on you. I won't.
I also don't have a problem saying that drag and kink in general is not suitable for kids. How about you?
Shit, Piss, Cock, Cunt, Motherfucker, Cocksucker and Tits.
-various artists
Joe wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2023 1:22 pm
he doesn't communicate
The 'Walsh Question' 'What Is A Woman?' I'll put an answer here when someone posts one that is clear and comprehensible, by apostates to the Faith.
Update: I've been offered one!
rainbow wrote: ↑Mon Nov 06, 2023 9:23 pm
It is actually quite easy. A woman has at least one X chromosome.
Strong ideas don't require censorship to survive. Weak ideas cannot survive without it.