One place that courage IS important, is when they agree to sit down to one of those longer interviews. Sanders did a long one, as have a few others. Trump hasn't (though he does more than most) but allowing a conversation to go on that long takes courage. At least if you consider the risks of saying something damaging.Joe wrote: ↑Thu Apr 21, 2022 11:11 pmYou've said before, but the topic here is the so-called leadership of the Republican Party and how events are demonstrating Trump's continuing grip on the GOP. While I may joke about profiles in courage, the operative factor in most US politicians is the calculus, and if you read the full NYT article you'd see that neither McCarthy nor McConnell could get the votes from their own caucus. I guess they lacked the courage to go against their base.Cunt wrote: ↑Thu Apr 21, 2022 8:28 pmI think it's very courageous how most social media platforms remove Trump's voice.
They are bravely protecting their subjects from hearing his comments about the safest election ever, and boldly protecting the most popular president in US history.
They are obviously MUCH more courageous than McConnell. Man looks like a turtle trying to have a shit, but not quite making it happen.
Speaking of profiles in courage, it was no surprise to see Ukrainian President Zelensky get one of this year's JFK Profile in Courage Awards, but I'm sure you're pleased to see Liz Cheney on the list as well, since political courage is so important to you.
I wish more of them had to do it. Longer-form recorded conversations with their opponents would be ideal. No moderator, no theatre, just two mic's and plenty of time.
How do you think Biden would fare against, say, DeSantis? Or Sanders and Occasional-Cortex?
Some of them seem they would be likely to show weakness. (I think Alexandria would sound like a fucking idiot after awhile, with Bernie)