What for? Great question! We have his words on it (though limited) but the university seems to be playing a bit closer to the chest.
Globe article.
Since the university hasn't said exactly which statements are the ones which got him fired, it seems we are to trust their judgement on it. Some guesses (also from the article) include:University spokesman Scott Roberts said he is unable to comment or “provide any elaboration” on the dismissal as it is a confidential personnel matter.
He also was unable to provide details of the findings of the investigation overseen by Dalhousie University professor emeritus Wayne MacKay, noting that it’s a “privileged document.”
The Acadia University Faculty Association said in a statement Friday it was informed of the firing on Aug. 31, and has since filed for arbitration.
“The termination of a tenured professor is very serious, and (the faculty association) has filed for arbitration while its senior grievance officer and legal counsel examine the administration’s disciplinary procedures and evidence,” the statement said.
Mehta could not immediately be reached for comment on Friday. However, he retweeted a blog article that discussed his firing.
Last month, he said in an email that the only way he could have a copy of the investigation report by MacKay was by signing an agreement, which he called a “gag order.”
Mehta was outspoken both on campus and online about a range of contentious issues including decolonization, immigration and gender politics, garnering both supporters and opposition.
He came under fire for saying multiculturalism is a scam, denying the wage gap between men and women, and dismissing the Truth and Reconciliation Commission as a vehicle for “endless apologies and compensation.”
On Twitter, he retweeted a post that said it is “statistically impossible for all Native children to have had a negative experience with residential schools.”
None of what he said sounds like it could be shown to be wrong. Maybe unpopular, but really - the wage gap? Still being defended? That is a sign of a bullshitter nearly as clear as a tinfoil hat.
Anyone else know anything about it? Or will this remain an internal matter to the university?