Oh, yes, right, because men aren't competing for female attention now, lol. What'd be good is to make men MORE challenged when it comes to getting women. Have them compete with robots with vibrating, pulsating, size-adjustable penises, who also do the household chores. That'd be "quite reasonable" and not such a bad thing.Would that be such a bad thing? In the #MeToo age, I feel like raising standards is quite reasonable. It’s called for, in fact. Make the men compete. It’s the dating equivalent of having free state colleges lower tuition rates everywhere.
Robot women, of course, would be pure, naked objectification, and misogynistic.
After all, men murder women, so robots could only be an improvement:
LOL - this one's good -There is, for example, the possibility that hackers could turn sex robots into killers. But the statistician in me can’t help asking: Would that make them more of a threat than actual men? Given the baseline murder rate for human sexual partners, it’s hard to get too worried. Plus, if they can understand female anatomy — I mean, really understand it — maybe it’s worth the risk.
Tell us how you really feel. You don't want to live in a "militant feminist world without men" (interesting admission there, that militant feminism envisions a world without men...). But you just think that men and women won't live together and women will no longer have to treat men like children, making their doctor appointments and doing "all" the household chores.....Just to be clear: I’m not saying we should want to live in a militant feminist world without men. Far from it, I am suggesting that women and men can coexist, but possibly not cohabitate. Men will likely have trouble with things like household chores and remembering to go to the doctor regularly, but they’ll manage. Maybe Siri can make their appointments.
