Crumple wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-40978515
Should Washington and Jefferson monuments come down?
This article contains language that some readers may find offensive. The BBC will publish it anyway cos they are thousands of miles away from the shit they're stirring. And a great story of US Taliban blowing up Rushmore...think of the footage?

Thank you for the link to an excellent article. But, as usual, it is deficient in analysis. Galaxian will illuminate the seeming contradictions in the article that so puzzled the journalist & the historian he was quoting.
A long time ago I had a debate with a fundamentalist Christian, during which I commented that religion was probably the major cause of conflict in the world. He agreed! That is a paradox. Here's another one: The 10 Commandments has seemingly altruistic injunctions, such as
"Thou shalt not kill". "Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife (or house)", "Thou shalt not commit adultary" etc. It all seems bizarre & hypocritical, till you realize that their dictionary & yours are not the same. They're speaking a different language.
The fundamentalist Christian saw his belief as the unerring Word of God. Other ideas were 'religions'. Thus he could agree that religions are a cause of war. The Ten Commandments are a set of instructions for the Jewish tribe. Murder is something you do to your fellow Jew, it is NOT something that you do to a cow or sheep or goy/gentile (known as "beasts on two legs"). Adultary is illicit sexual relations with a Jew. Therefore having slave concubines is not adultery. Theft can only be done from a Jew. The Chosen People are allowed to take whatever they want from a non-Jew, since animals cannot own anything. Read the Talmud & be enlightened.
Similarly, to Washington & Jefferson, the Negroes were not actually humans. Thus, the Declaration of Independence & "All men are created equal", literally referred to humans, and NOT to Negroes. Therefore there is no paradox in owning black slaves or 'servants', whipping them, forcing them to work, and writing about compassion to your fellow man. Your fellow man did not include beasts of burden.
We have an identical situation today. You can see cattle on farms, or dogs on the street. They do not have voting rights. You can bomb without conscience innumerable 'rag-heads' or 'slant-eyes' in other parts of the world. But you must weep if even ONE Yankee is injured or killed. You can obliterate their infrastructure, since they are not really works of civilization, and no one is prosecuted, no one pays compensation. But if ANYTHING happens (or even not) to Gringo assets, there's hell to pay! Assets & bank accounts will be stolen, by the US government, as payback.
Now to the topic of this thread about tearing down heritage statues in the USA. Here you go:
You see, what goes around; http://img.zeit.de/gesellschaft/zeitges ... 9__desktop

Comes around! https://thenypost.files.wordpress.com/2 ... 441&crop=1
