Capitalism, The Best Solution to Poverty
- Brian Peacock
- Tipping cows since 1946
- Posts: 38031
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
- About me: Ablate me:
- Location: Location: Location:
- Contact:
Re: Capitalism, The Best Solution to Poverty
Hehe. Yeah, the Dutch might not have had counts, dukes, or earls etc but the main features of an aristocracy are royal patronage and heredity, of which we are told the NL had none - in which case they had only one feudal lord, the king.
I'm still confused as to why a pretty incontrovertible statement about European economies historically transitioning from feudal to capital models from the 1600s has been disputed, as well as being taken as an attack on the NL, but there you go.
I'm still confused as to why a pretty incontrovertible statement about European economies historically transitioning from feudal to capital models from the 1600s has been disputed, as well as being taken as an attack on the NL, but there you go.
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
- Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
- Contact:
Re: Capitalism, The Best Solution to Poverty
No. Jab #1 installs the bots. Jab #2 activates them. Expect a change in what I post starting on the 1st of September.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
- Scot Dutchy
- Posts: 19000
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:07 pm
- About me: Dijkbeschermer
- Location: 's-Gravenhage, Nederland
- Contact:
Re: Capitalism, The Best Solution to Poverty
This society historically never had an aristocracy. When land was reclaimed it became the property of the gemeente (community). The dykes were kept up by waterschappen (water companies) and became very powerful. They charged taxes and still do for the maintenance of the dykes, sluices etc. I pay €350 a year to keep dry. Dams were owned by other companies and charged for their use. So came to exist the simple capitalist model which incorporated a very socialist side. The were special arrangements for people who were unable to pay the taxes. People were not exploited. They paid in kind.
"Wat is het een gezellig boel hier".
- Scot Dutchy
- Posts: 19000
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:07 pm
- About me: Dijkbeschermer
- Location: 's-Gravenhage, Nederland
- Contact:
Re: Capitalism, The Best Solution to Poverty
For a feudal system you need a royal court with knights etc. There was no feudal system here as in the UK and France. We had upstarts that liked to give themselves titles but the Stadhouder soon quashed their little dream. By the time William I became king as such he never had a court and the country was run by merchants with the trumped up aristocracy was frowned upon. We still have a few jonkheers lurking around whose ancestry is at least to say dubious.Brian Peacock wrote: ↑Sat Jun 12, 2021 7:41 amHehe. Yeah, the Dutch might not have had counts, dukes, or earls etc but the main features of an aristocracy are royal patronage and heredity, of which we are told the NL had none - in which case they had only one feudal lord, the king.
I'm still confused as to why a pretty incontrovertible statement about European economies historically transitioning from feudal to capital models from the 1600s has been disputed, as well as being taken as an attack on the NL, but there you go.
"Wat is het een gezellig boel hier".
- Brian Peacock
- Tipping cows since 1946
- Posts: 38031
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
- About me: Ablate me:
- Location: Location: Location:
- Contact:
Re: Capitalism, The Best Solution to Poverty
Nope. Feudalism does not require monarchies. Simple warlords will do, whether you call them kings, or chiefs, or something else.Scot Dutchy wrote:For a feudal system you need a royal court with knights etc. There was no feudal system here as in the UK and France. We had upstarts that liked to give themselves titles but the Stadhouder soon quashed their little dream. By the time William I became king as such he never had a court and the country was run by merchants with the trumped up aristocracy was frowned upon. We still have a few jonkheers lurking around whose ancestry is at least to say dubious.Brian Peacock wrote: ↑Sat Jun 12, 2021 7:41 amHehe. Yeah, the Dutch might not have had counts, dukes, or earls etc but the main features of an aristocracy are royal patronage and heredity, of which we are told the NL had none - in which case they had only one feudal lord, the king.
I'm still confused as to why a pretty incontrovertible statement about European economies historically transitioning from feudal to capital models from the 1600s has been disputed, as well as being taken as an attack on the NL, but there you go.
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
- Scot Dutchy
- Posts: 19000
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:07 pm
- About me: Dijkbeschermer
- Location: 's-Gravenhage, Nederland
- Contact:
Re: Capitalism, The Best Solution to Poverty
Well we never had them. The feudal system required unflinching devotion from those in it. Not very Dutch I am afraid.
"Wat is het een gezellig boel hier".
- Brian Peacock
- Tipping cows since 1946
- Posts: 38031
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
- About me: Ablate me:
- Location: Location: Location:
- Contact:
Re: Capitalism, The Best Solution to Poverty
Nope. Feudalism does not require unflinching devotion to monarchies. Simple warlords with the ability to enforce their will is enough. Again, I'd encourage to expand your thinking to a time before the formation of the modern state of the Netherlands, and to question narratives which claim a default historical virtue for one state over all others.Scot Dutchy wrote: ↑Sat Jun 12, 2021 8:18 amWell we never had them. The feudal system required unflinching devotion from those in it. Not very Dutch I am afraid.
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
- Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
- Contact:
Re: Capitalism, The Best Solution to Poverty
Unflinching devotion? Tell the barons who dictated the Magna Carta. Or the aristocrats of the Fronde who led a five year long war against Louis XIV. Or the German Kurfürsten, who from 1125 until the abolition of the Holy Roman Empire in August 1806 decided who their next emperor was to be.Scot Dutchy wrote: ↑Sat Jun 12, 2021 8:18 amThe feudal system required unflinching devotion from those in it.
You have not done much history, have you?
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 40377
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: Capitalism, The Best Solution to Poverty
If that's correct, can you explain me what caused trouble between the French Kings and the Flemings in the late 1200s and early 1300s until the 100 year war gave the French more important stuff to think of than asserting their legitimate power over unruly burghers?Scot Dutchy wrote: ↑Sat Jun 12, 2021 8:03 amFor a feudal system you need a royal court with knights etc. There was no feudal system here as in the UK and France. We had upstarts that liked to give themselves titles but the Stadhouder soon quashed their little dream. By the time William I became king as such he never had a court and the country was run by merchants with the trumped up aristocracy was frowned upon. We still have a few jonkheers lurking around whose ancestry is at least to say dubious.Brian Peacock wrote: ↑Sat Jun 12, 2021 7:41 amHehe. Yeah, the Dutch might not have had counts, dukes, or earls etc but the main features of an aristocracy are royal patronage and heredity, of which we are told the NL had none - in which case they had only one feudal lord, the king.
I'm still confused as to why a pretty incontrovertible statement about European economies historically transitioning from feudal to capital models from the 1600s has been disputed, as well as being taken as an attack on the NL, but there you go.
Or How the Dutch provinces came to be Possession of the Habsburgs?
or for that matter what class the Princes of Orange came from if not the old Feudal aristocracy? We're talking a guy with enough blue blood to have marriage ties with the Stuarts and to be offered a certain throne if he would just help getting its legitimate tenant's arse out of it?
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 40377
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: Capitalism, The Best Solution to Poverty
Thus spoken by somebody who has obviously never seriously studied history.Scot Dutchy wrote: ↑Sat Jun 12, 2021 8:18 amWell we never had them. The feudal system required unflinching devotion from those in it. Not very Dutch I am afraid.
France had a feudal system for about 1200 years, and I can tell you that the system never inspired much devotion from anybody. The landed gentry wanted to get bigger, the bigger nobles wanted that too, and increased revenue and duties from their vassal, and more autonomy from the Crown, and the King wanted to be master of all the house rather than letting various people each doing what they wanted with their own room.
and of course, while the nobility plotted to tax them dry, the commoners just wanted to be rid of them and keep the money.
I don't know if england had any feudal traits before william the bastard took over, but it was the same as in France, except that william had set things up as more royal centric that they were in France, so the nobility were much more likely to get into conflict with the Crown, and things did not improve when the magna carta devolved various powers to parliament, and when wealthy commoners started to have a voice there.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
- Scot Dutchy
- Posts: 19000
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:07 pm
- About me: Dijkbeschermer
- Location: 's-Gravenhage, Nederland
- Contact:
Re: Capitalism, The Best Solution to Poverty
Svarty we never had that. There was no feudal system. Our first king was William I and he was not a king in the English or French definition. He was originally Stadhouder of Holland. We did not have vast landowners. 40% of the country was underwater or marshland. When it was reclaimed it belonged to the community. People could buy the leasehold so as to build anything. Your lack of knowledge of Dutch history is comparable to that mine of French history.
My original knowledge of history was restricted to Scottish history. I later on in secondary school studied modern history.
My original knowledge of history was restricted to Scottish history. I later on in secondary school studied modern history.
"Wat is het een gezellig boel hier".
- Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
- Contact:
Re: Capitalism, The Best Solution to Poverty
He was a de facto king and the Dutch republics were de facto feudal societies. I explained it here. You must have missed it. Otherwise you would not be repeating your bullshit.Scot Dutchy wrote: ↑Mon Jun 14, 2021 7:01 amSvarty we never had that. There was no feudal system. Our first king was William I and he was not a king in the English or French definition.
Hermit wrote: ↑Sat Jun 12, 2021 7:29 amAfter the Dutch got rid of the Spanish Habsburgs they formed republics of sorts, but not democracies as we understand democracy today. Also, the Stadhouders', while theoretically subordinate to the states, wielded near-supreme power, especially in 1619–50, 1672–1702, and 1747–95. They were de facto monarchs. After the election of Prince William IV to all of the stadtholderates in 1747, the offices were made hereditary, so any pretence of not being a monarchy was academic. The Dutch were only governed without a Stadhouder between 1650–72 and 1702–47. William V, prince of Orange and Nassau and general hereditary stadtholder of the Dutch Republic from 1751 until 1795. For much of the period since the Habsburgs were thrown out, the members of the basically self-electing Dutch parliaments were hardly distinguishable from the nobility in the UK.
Then there was William V's eldest son, who reigned as William I, King of the Netherlands, from 1815 to 1840. Formally, the Netherlands have remained a kingdom ever since, although, like the monarchs in the UK, the Dutch Kings and Queens have increasingly become ceremonial figureheads.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 40377
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: Capitalism, The Best Solution to Poverty
I don't know where to check for places like Holland and Zeeland, but I can warrant you that Flanders at least was a classic feudal earldom, similarly, Edward III married a daughter of... and I have no reason to believe the Netherlands totally escaped the feudal form of governance, they were part of the Carolingian empire after all. And Edward III married a daughter of the Count of Hainault... and at the time, what is now Belgium was part of the Flemish/Frisian area.Scot Dutchy wrote: ↑Mon Jun 14, 2021 7:01 amSvarty we never had that. There was no feudal system. Our first king was William I and he was not a king in the English or French definition. He was originally Stadhouder of Holland. We did not have vast landowners. 40% of the country was underwater or marshland. When it was reclaimed it belonged to the community. People could buy the leasehold so as to build anything. Your lack of knowledge of Dutch history is comparable to that mine of French history.
My original knowledge of history was restricted to Scottish history. I later on in secondary school studied modern history.
Also, the office of Stadhouder was created to be a form of stewardship when the provinces' feudal lords were away... particularly in the late middle ages/early modern times when the provinces were under Burgundian or Habsburg sway, and so had come under feudal rulership of a distant lord.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
- Brian Peacock
- Tipping cows since 1946
- Posts: 38031
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
- About me: Ablate me:
- Location: Location: Location:
- Contact:
Re: Capitalism, The Best Solution to Poverty
If the apparently non-feudal Netherlands never transitioned from a feudal model to capitalism, from what did it transition? Are we to take it that the Dutch were always Capitalists all the way back to the stone age?
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
- JimC
- The sentimental bloke
- Posts: 73101
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
- About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Capitalism, The Best Solution to Poverty
It were the tulips what done it...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!
And my gin!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests