L'Emmerdeur wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 12:31 am
Cunt wrote: ↑Sun Mar 01, 2020 11:35 pm
L'Emmerdeur wrote: ↑Sun Mar 01, 2020 9:17 pm
I suppose that's something. Meanwhile it looks like you've got nothing at all to support your claim about the Republican bill that we were originally discussing. Par for the course.
It started because I claimed that the dems were crowded into defending their fringe ideas. You asked me, I thought this 'open borders' thing was one.
I'm wrong - ok.
What are the lefts radical fringe ideas?
This is evidence that your short-term memory may be deficient. Let your mind drift back to the hoary ages of yesteryore, back to Wed Feb 26, 2020. We see a jolly fellow from Canada posting the following:
Cunt wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 3:15 pm
Dem's just blocked the 'born alive' bill. It's uncanny how often the same tactic is used against them - push them to align with the furthest-left fringe of their party, then criticize them for being fringe.
In discussion of this post, I asked you 'what is the 'ludicrous fringe ideal' that Democrats are supposedly being forced to defend.' The question referred to the Republican bill, as I've clarified for you more than once. I'm inclined to think at this point that you didn't actually have anything in mind and the second sentence had no connection with the first.
In the spectrum of opinions on abortion, the most fringe would be (at the Dem fringe end) always ok (this is my position, if phrased a bit colourlessly) and never ok (at the republican fringe end)
Arguably, disallowing the 'born alive bill' would fall furthest left, or so it would seem. This way, the Dems are pushed to defend voting against the bill, while the moderates (who may well support the bill) are left quiet and mostly avoiding the rest of the conversation. If I'm wrong about how the event was painted for (and by) republican perspectives on it, ok, and not important to the main point - Dems being forced to defend the fringe of their nutters.
So with abortion, 'fringe' at either end is pretty easy to identify. If I asked a republican to define 'far right, moderate and centrist' positions on it, I could get them.
Can you do the same for this issue, from a left perspective?
(I doubt I can...my position has long been 'everyone has a right to evict anyone from their body at any time, for any or no reason' and I don't feel moderation is good for anyone )
Shit, Piss, Cock, Cunt, Motherfucker, Cocksucker and Tits.
-various artists
Joe wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2023 1:22 pm
he doesn't communicate
The 'Walsh Question' 'What Is A Woman?' I'll put an answer here when someone posts one that is clear and comprehensible, by apostates to the Faith.
Update: I've been offered one!
rainbow wrote: ↑Mon Nov 06, 2023 9:23 pm
It is actually quite easy. A woman has at least one X chromosome.
Strong ideas don't require censorship to survive. Weak ideas cannot survive without it.