Daily Hate Takes A Unusual Ethical Stance

[cronus]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic ... -West.html

I’m afraid the bitter truth is Iraq and Libya were better off under the tyrants toppled by an arrogant and naive West

The tragic events in Gaza and Ukraine may be dominating the news, but even more terrible things are happening in Libya and Iraq. In both cases a naive and stupendously ill-conceived Western foreign policy is almost entirely to blame.
Many western embassies in Tripoli, including America’s, have closed, with diplomats deserting the city as fast as their legs will carry them, leaving the Libyans to their fate. Britain retains only a reduced embassy staff.
Meanwhile, in the north of Iraq — a country allegedly delivered into freedom from Saddam Hussein in 2003 — a psychopathic organisation called Islamic State (previously known as ISIS) is executing thousands of Shia Muslims and Christians as the central government in Baghdad looks on, powerless to intervene.
The largely untold story of the persecuted Iraqi Christian minority is especially shaming for those avowedly Christian leaders, George W. Bush and Tony Blair, who were responsible for the invasion of Iraq.


(continued)

[PsychoSerenity]

Only 12 years too late there, Daily Mail. Two million marched in London because they knew the war was wrong without a decade of hindsight.

[Robert_S]

Only 12 years too late there, Daily Mail. Two million marched in London because they knew the war was wrong without a decade of hindsight.

Only 12 years late though. From the few Mail articles I've read, 12 years behind is progress.

Anyone remember what the Mail's stance on it was leading into the fumble?