
http://news.oneindia.in/2010/10/28/moha ... in-uk.html
Maybe "Morehammered" could be one of them...Millefleur wrote:12 different spellings.. an attempt at originality?
how is this a negative? He just reported a story and commented on it. What other negatives, I mean I have a couple as well, just curious about you opinion.eXcommunicate wrote:I used to be a big Bill Maher fan, but the negatives with that guy are starting to outweigh the positives. This is another example.
Mohamhead ?JimC wrote:Maybe "Morehammered" could be one of them...Millefleur wrote:12 different spellings.. an attempt at originality?
Morehammerhead?Feck wrote:Mohamhead ?JimC wrote:Maybe "Morehammered" could be one of them...Millefleur wrote:12 different spellings.. an attempt at originality?
That Mohammed thing was in the news, and he comments on random stuff all the time so I see nothing wrong with that.sandinista wrote:how is this a negative? He just reported a story and commented on it. What other negatives, I mean I have a couple as well, just curious about you opinion.eXcommunicate wrote:I used to be a big Bill Maher fan, but the negatives with that guy are starting to outweigh the positives. This is another example.
What's weird is that every other name is has been given to less than 7,549 boys.A total of 7,549 newborns were given 12 variations of the Islamic prophet Mohammed's name last year, such as Muhammad and Mohammad, with the spelling of Mohammed topping the list for the West Midlands.
Well, being the political commentator that he is, I form my opinion about him based on the content of his commentary. In this instance, and in others (vaccinations, "big pharma" conspiracy crap, "alternative medicine," his undying support of Israel) he's proved to be an intellectual dullard. He used an innocuous statistic about newborn names to make some asinine comment about Islam "taking over" the West as if that's any real possibility in the next, I don't know, 100 years. As discussed in this thread, it only takes a modicum of thought to parse why the name "Mohammed," including its variants, would rank so high, and it has nothing to do with Islam taking over the West. I've found this kind of intellectual laziness come from him too many times to mention, and quite frankly, I don't care if he's a pot smoking Atheist, the guy is simply not as smart as he thinks he is and increasingly proves this as time wears on. Yes, the guy makes me chuckle every now and then; I don't deny that.sandinista wrote:how is this a negative? He just reported a story and commented on it. What other negatives, I mean I have a couple as well, just curious about you opinion.eXcommunicate wrote:I used to be a big Bill Maher fan, but the negatives with that guy are starting to outweigh the positives. This is another example.
fair enough, I agree his stance on isreal is baloney and he should know better, he has also unfairly criticized Chavez (which I believe he retracted on a later show). He was also for the war in Afghanistan, BUT, unlike most political commentators, one great thing about Bill is that he generally admits when he's wrong, or has been misguided. He did so in regards to Chavez and Afghanistan. He is far and away better an more on target politically than any other "political comedian" with a weekly show though, because of that, I don't really mind that I disagree with him on a few points, I mean I don't agree 100 percent with anyone really.eXcommunicate wrote:Well, being the political commentator that he is, I form my opinion about him based on the content of his commentary. In this instance, and in others (vaccinations, "big pharma" conspiracy crap, "alternative medicine," his undying support of Israel) he's proved to be an intellectual dullard. He used an innocuous statistic about newborn names to make some asinine comment about Islam "taking over" the West as if that's any real possibility in the next, I don't know, 100 years. As discussed in this thread, it only takes a modicum of thought to parse why the name "Mohammed," including its variants, would rank so high, and it has nothing to do with Islam taking over the West. I've found this kind of intellectual laziness come from him too many times to mention, and quite frankly, I don't care if he's a pot smoking Atheist, the guy is simply not as smart as he thinks he is and increasingly proves this as time wears on. Yes, the guy makes me chuckle every now and then; I don't deny that.sandinista wrote:how is this a negative? He just reported a story and commented on it. What other negatives, I mean I have a couple as well, just curious about you opinion.eXcommunicate wrote:I used to be a big Bill Maher fan, but the negatives with that guy are starting to outweigh the positives. This is another example.
It is kind of an ugly name.lsdetroit wrote:i always thought mohammed was an ugly name, regardless of the islamic origin.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests