Feck wrote:Your OP stated that you are losing some of your freedom
No it doesn't, not me anyway. The article is lengthy, and maybe the author said so. The article is also not about the US.
Feck wrote:
,we agree this is a BAD thing ...
Loss of freedom is generally a bad thing.
Feck wrote:
I'm just a bit confused because you seem to link that with your current government?
I didn't link it, or seem to link it.
I just posted it as look into the future, when technology will allow the government and others to basically monitor everything 24-7. I also suggested that we can't stop it, so we might as well embrace it.
Feck wrote:
and some of us have been screaming and protesting about this for a LONG time .Your Government is owned by the Market (not saying any of ours was any better.)
If that were true, then we would not have had some of the omnibus "overhauls" we've just had. Private business is not pleased with what's happening.
Further, "the market" doesn't own anything. Companies and people own things. The market is the system of buying and selling things. It's not a thing.
Feck wrote:
I would agree with you that the libertarians should have been protesting this harder than the "loony left"
I never said anything about what the Libertarians should do or not do, and I've never used the term "loony left," I can assure you about that.
Feck wrote:
My point was that if international politics takes little or no account of rights or laws
Yes, that's true, because most countries in this world don't have an Enlightenment concept of the Rights of Man.
Feck wrote:
why do you think Merikans are going to go unscathed by the Big Brother governments that got us into this mess in the first place .
I never said they would. I said, in the OP, that we can't stop it, so we might as well embrace it. Were you reading someone else's post? Or, were you creating your own post and attributing it to me?
Feck wrote:
There were protests about about human rights and liberty BUT they all seemed to be from the opposite end of the political spectrum to you .
That's not true. Both ends of the spectrum objected strenuously to warrantless wiretapping.
Once again, though, my point was about consistency. Why would the same people who were livid before, be ho-hum now (especially when we are talking about an even worse invasion)? My guess is because their boys are in the power position now. So, they don't want to criticize for fear of inhibiting all the "good work" that their boys are doing. I see a lot of that - it's the "Oh, we don't criticize Obama for, say, expanding Bush's faith based initiatives by more than double, because he's doing such good work...." Right? Bush was a creep and tearing up the constitution by having his faith-based initiatives, but Obama, ah, no biggie for him.
Feck wrote:
My comments were made in the light of a right wing merkin
Who, exactly?
Feck wrote:
commenting on civil liberties because a few of yours might be curtailed ....
You're calling ME "right wing?" Are you mad? Do you even know what "right wing" means?
Feck wrote:
yes you were right ,Get used to it! we already have it and it was mostly introduced by flag waving right wingers talking about our Freedumb and democracy .
Really? Did you read the article? It's in the U.K., and the U.K. has been worlds ahead of the dumb, right-wing Americans in terms of surveillance. None of your liberal and socialist parties object to them. Do they? If so, they're damn quiet about it.