American Politics from 2019 on

[rasetsu]

Because that strikes me as dishonest.

What are you saying strikes you as dishonest?

[Cunt]

There was no legitimate warning. They hadn't even seen the evidence, in many cases.

They hinted anyway, and those hints convinced people who don't need a claim, only a hint.

What did they trick YOU into believing? lol

Your defense has all the hallmarks of someone making their own beliefs up, based on a disinformation letter sent by a government propaganda group.

[Cunt]

Because that strikes me as dishonest.

What are you saying strikes you as dishonest?

If you don't understand yet, you won't.

But your writing on the matter has all the hallmarks of being written by the victim of government mis, dis, or mal-information campaigns.

[rasetsu]

Because that strikes me as dishonest.

What are you saying strikes you as dishonest?

If you don't understand yet, you won't.

But your writing on the matter has all the hallmarks of being written by the victim of government mis, dis, or mal-information campaigns.

Your claim of dishonesty was preceded by two, apparently rhetorical, questions. You don't get to be fuzzy on whether and what you are claiming if you don't want to be accused of dishonesty for the same reasons and causes that you attribute dishonesty to the letter writers. I'm simply asking you to make your claim clear. Apparently, you have a hard time with that.

[Joe]

There was no legitimate warning. They hadn't even seen the evidence, in many cases.

They hinted anyway, and those hints convinced people who don't need a claim, only a hint.

What did they trick YOU into believing? lol

Your defense has all the hallmarks of someone making their own beliefs up, based on a disinformation letter sent by a government propaganda group.

You're welcome to your baseless opinion Cunt, but I've shown the factual and historical basis for my belief and your puerile trolling only shows you can't muster an intelligent counterargument.

[rasetsu]

There was no legitimate warning. They hadn't even seen the evidence, in many cases.

They hinted anyway, and those hints convinced people who don't need a claim, only a hint.

What did they trick YOU into believing? lol

Your defense has all the hallmarks of someone making their own beliefs up, based on a disinformation letter sent by a government propaganda group.

You're welcome to your baseless opinion Cunt, but I've shown the factual and historical basis for my belief and your puerile trolling only shows you can't muster an intelligent counterargument.

[Cunt]

Because that strikes me as dishonest.

What are you saying strikes you as dishonest?

If you don't understand yet, you won't.

But your writing on the matter has all the hallmarks of being written by the victim of government mis, dis, or mal-information campaigns.

Your claim of dishonesty was preceded by two, apparently rhetorical, questions. You don't get to be fuzzy on whether and what you are claiming if you don't want to be accused of dishonesty for the same reasons and causes that you attribute dishonesty to the letter writers. I'm simply asking you to make your claim clear. Apparently, you have a hard time with that.

You don't know which of the signatories of that letter saw the evidence before signing on. But ya, you treat it like honest writing. Funny coincidence it agrees with your priors.

You're welcome to your baseless opinion Cunt, but I've shown the factual and historical basis for my belief and your puerile trolling only shows you can't muster an intelligent counterargument.

It isn't as baseless as the letter you keep on referencing.

There IS no base of anything in it, except for weasel words and partisan politics. Easy to act like there was something in it though. Especially when you work so hard to back up the claims even THEY wouldn't dare make.

[rasetsu]

Because that strikes me as dishonest.

What are you saying strikes you as dishonest?

If you don't understand yet, you won't.

But your writing on the matter has all the hallmarks of being written by the victim of government mis, dis, or mal-information campaigns.

Your claim of dishonesty was preceded by two, apparently rhetorical, questions. You don't get to be fuzzy on whether and what you are claiming if you don't want to be accused of dishonesty for the same reasons and causes that you attribute dishonesty to the letter writers. I'm simply asking you to make your claim clear. Apparently, you have a hard time with that.

You don't know which of the signatories of that letter saw the evidence before signing on. But ya, you treat it like honest writing. Funny coincidence it agrees with your priors.

What I may or may not have done is a red herring. What are you claiming about the letter and its authors?

[Cunt]

What I may or may not have done is a red herring. What are you claiming about the letter and its authors?

You should try using a demanding tone, while wearing a 'fuck my ass' avatar. It makes you sound more serious and knowledgeable.

Let me know when you get it dialed in. This demand seems juvenile and weak. Doesn't make me want to try explaining it to you again.

[Cunt]

One way to see how clearly they are dishonest, is to remember what happens when honest writers expose government corruption.

Julian Assange, Edward Snowden and others have left clues.

[rasetsu]

What I may or may not have done is a red herring. What are you claiming about the letter and its authors?

You should try using a demanding tone, while wearing a 'fuck my ass' avatar. It makes you sound more serious and knowledgeable.

Let me know when you get it dialed in. This demand seems juvenile and weak. Doesn't make me want to try explaining it to you again.

Again? You haven't explained it yet!

[Cunt]

Just do what you think the intelligence community wants you to do.

[Joe]

There was no legitimate warning. They hadn't even seen the evidence, in many cases.

They hinted anyway, and those hints convinced people who don't need a claim, only a hint.

What did they trick YOU into believing? lol

Your defense has all the hallmarks of someone making their own beliefs up, based on a disinformation letter sent by a government propaganda group.

You're welcome to your baseless opinion Cunt, but I've shown the factual and historical basis for my belief and your puerile trolling only shows you can't muster an intelligent counterargument.

[Cunt]

What I would really like, is if someone who can't say the difference between men and women, could tell me about their political views. Because their inability to be honest really gives their wibble proper authority.

[Cunt]