We need to talk about Donald: cursing and swearing allowed

Locked
User avatar
Tyrannical
Posts: 6468
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
Contact:

Re: We need to talk about Donald: cursing and swearing allow

Post by Tyrannical » Mon Oct 30, 2017 7:47 pm

Don't just sack Mueller, investigate him. He was head of the FBI when manafort actions were first investigated. When he was working for the Clintons....
Oh, and get Comey too.
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.

User avatar
Tero
Just saying
Posts: 51258
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
About me: 15-32-25
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: We need to talk about Donald: cursing and swearing allow

Post by Tero » Mon Oct 30, 2017 9:44 pm

Clinton is not president.

devogue

Re: We need to talk about Donald: cursing and swearing allow

Post by devogue » Mon Oct 30, 2017 10:49 pm

I have read the evidence and resultant official charges but I genuinely can't see where Trump is implicated in any of it.

Yes, the alleged perpetrators were associates of his, but I can't see how their alleged crimes have anything to do with the Trump-Russia affair.

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41039
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: We need to talk about Donald: cursing and swearing allow

Post by Svartalf » Mon Oct 30, 2017 11:03 pm

well, they conspired to mess with the elections and he's benefited from it, he received the stolen goods...
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

devogue

Re: We need to talk about Donald: cursing and swearing allow

Post by devogue » Mon Oct 30, 2017 11:19 pm

Svartalf wrote:well, they conspired to mess with the elections and he's benefited from it, he received the stolen goods...
But there is absolutely nothing in the charges that suggests that.

They are based entirely on personal financial irregularities and personal concealment from the US authorities of links with foreign organisations that should have been declared. Moreover, those links were in the Ukraine, not in Russia where we have been told Trump's team commited crimes.

There is nothing in the charges to suggest illegal involvement by either defendant for or on behalf of Trump.

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41039
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: We need to talk about Donald: cursing and swearing allow

Post by Svartalf » Mon Oct 30, 2017 11:27 pm

c'mon, are you thick or just trolling?
no, don't answer, not even seth could be so thick
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74155
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: We need to talk about Donald: cursing and swearing allow

Post by JimC » Mon Oct 30, 2017 11:30 pm

Trump may well have said to trusted aides during the campaign "use any dirty tricks you can find to do the dirt on Hillary, just don't tell me how you got the info". With a scenario like that, it may well be that formal legal evidence of Trump's involvement will not be available, but it is pretty clear that his whole campaign was irrevocably tainted by dirty deals with foreign powers pursuing their own national interests. He is morally culpable, if not legally so...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41039
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: We need to talk about Donald: cursing and swearing allow

Post by Svartalf » Mon Oct 30, 2017 11:35 pm

as the beneficiary of the rigged election, he still ought to be impeached, all hail pdt pence
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

devogue

Re: We need to talk about Donald: cursing and swearing allow

Post by devogue » Mon Oct 30, 2017 11:50 pm

Svartalf wrote:c'mon, are you thick or just trolling?
no, don't answer, not even seth could be so thick
No, I will answer.

I would love nothing more than to see Trump crash and burn, and hopefully Russia will be what brings him down - I think that irrefutable proof of treason and consorting with Putin is really the only hope of getting rid of the turd without America collapsing in on itself entirely.

However, unlike you it seems, I have carefully read the indictments against Manafort and Gates in full, and I am telling you that there is nothing within those indictments that suggests illegal communication or plotting with the Russians on behalf of the Trump campaign.

The media is attempting to create an unnecessary and impatient storm by chucking Manafort and Gates in to a pot with the undoubtedly important Papadopoulos.

User avatar
L'Emmerdeur
Posts: 6236
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2011 11:04 pm
About me: Yuh wust nightmaya!
Contact:

Re: We need to talk about Donald: cursing and swearing allow

Post by L'Emmerdeur » Mon Oct 30, 2017 11:55 pm

The charges could supply leverage to get Manafort and Gates to tell what they know about actual collusion.

On the other hand as you mention, the guilty plea by Papadopoulos is direct evidence of attempted collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.
Papadopoulos’ exact level of engagement in the Trump campaign became an instant point of debate on Monday: The White House downplayed him as a low-level “volunteer,” even as photos circulated of him sitting at a table with Trump and just two people away from attorney general Jeff Sessions.

Mueller’s bombshell announcement: Papadopoulos had worked with people he knew to be involved at a high level with the Russian government in an attempt to obtain “dirt” on Hillary Clinton, notably thousands of stolen emails. He had worked to “arrange a meeting between the Campaign and the Russian government officials” and had otherwise endeavored through multiple rounds of contacts with both Russian-linked individuals and with the Trump campaign to coordinate gaining access to material that would harm Trump’s Democratic opponent. At least one of his contacts was with a woman he believed—evidently incorrectly—was a niece of Russian president Vladimir Putin.

devogue

Re: We need to talk about Donald: cursing and swearing allow

Post by devogue » Mon Oct 30, 2017 11:57 pm

L'Emmerdeur wrote:The charges could supply leverage to get Manafort and Gates to tell what they know about actual collusion.
Excellent point, but I really think the media do themselves no favours (and they need to be extra careful in the current climate).

User avatar
Brian Peacock
Tipping cows since 1946
Posts: 39943
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
About me: Ablate me:
Location: Location: Location:
Contact:

Re: We need to talk about Donald: cursing and swearing allow

Post by Brian Peacock » Tue Oct 31, 2017 1:12 am

devogue wrote:I have read the evidence and resultant official charges but I genuinely can't see where Trump is implicated in any of it.

Yes, the alleged perpetrators were associates of his, but I can't see how their alleged crimes have anything to do with the Trump-Russia affair.
This isn't the entirety of the investigation, just the first round of indicments, and we have to remember that the connection being investigated is between the presidential campaign of Trump and a foreign government, not between Russia and Trump himself. As it stands Trump has a certain distance from the indictments published today, which mostly focus on Manafort and Gates convoluted schemes to hide the nature of their connection with Putin's political puppets in the Ukraine along with the incomes they received from many and varied sources and in turn spent overwhelmingly on political lobbying and PR firms - as well as enriching themselves while falsifying accounts and avoiding taxes. To the extent that the indictment outlines the lengths they went to obfuscate the nature of their business and political dealings gives Trump a buffer from the action of Manafort etc - though, of course, it doesn't distance him from the fact that he employed such a shady and dodgily connected dealer to manage his campaign in the first place.
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.

.

"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."

Frank Zappa

"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.

User avatar
DRSB
Posts: 5601
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 12:07 pm
Location: Switzerland
Contact:

Re: We need to talk about Donald: cursing and swearing allow

Post by DRSB » Tue Oct 31, 2017 6:50 am

TRUMP MAY NOT SEEK RE-ELECTION: RAND PAUL, CHRIS CHRISTIE
http://www.newsweek.com/trump-2020-elec ... ort-696089

User avatar
Scot Dutchy
Posts: 19000
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:07 pm
About me: Dijkbeschermer
Location: 's-Gravenhage, Nederland
Contact:

Re: We need to talk about Donald: cursing and swearing allow

Post by Scot Dutchy » Tue Oct 31, 2017 7:30 am

Just remember Watergate. Nixon thought he was safe as well. These are just a few drops of stream that will eventually wash away Trump.

"Wat is het een gezellig boel hier".

User avatar
Forty Two
Posts: 14978
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
Contact:

Re: We need to talk about Donald: cursing and swearing allow

Post by Forty Two » Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:31 am

Tero wrote:Clinton is not president.
If she was, would you think the allegations merited investigation? :thinks:
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests