It looks like a golf and tennis club with a spa, etc.
But, so what? There is nothing wrong with sex parties. But there isn't even an allegation that sex parties happened there. There isn't even any allegation outside of the twice dismissed, election year civil suit filed anonymously by a Plaintiff trying to assert 20+ year old allegations.
If that kind of evidence is persuasive to you, then why do you deny the allegations against Hillary Clinton? I mean, there is far more direct, undisputed evidence against her.
For example, it is indisputable that she cheated in the primaries. She got debate questions ahead of time, accepted them and said nothing about it, and her lackey, Donna Brazile, lost her job at CNN over it. That's established beyond doubt to have happened twice. We can speculate whether those were the only two times. Hillary was dishonest, and did not reject the offer and did not tell anyone about it, as an honest person would do.
Moreover, it is indisputable that she lied through her teeth about the private server, about turning over all documents (which she didn't), about sending and receiving classified information (which she did), about why she had the server, about her use of only one device, about her being given permission to use the private server, and about it being lawful to do so. All that, and more, is established. She's a lying piece of shit.
Also, it was established that she colluded with Debbie Wasserman Schultz and the Democratic National Committee, who were saying all the time that there was no collusion and they were neutral in the primary race, all the while working to defeat Bernie Sanders. They lied. Hillary lied. Wasserman Schultz lied. Brazile lied. Etc.
And, they lied about the Clinton Foundation, which was participating in the pay-for-play game with access to the State Department. And, as Bernie Sanders said, the receipt of foreign money by the Clinton foundation while Hillary was Secretary of State is a big problem. That's not cricket, at all.
They lied about her illness, too. First she wasn't having any seizures, her health was just fine, and it was all a big right wing conspiracy that deserved zero coverage. Then, when they couldn't deny it anymore, and she was falling down and getting carried into her car, they came up with deceitful photo ops with little girls, and created an explanation about pneumonia, which she supposedly had for an extended period of time while coughing all over people as she attended fund-raisers, campaign rallies, and dinners.
Under subpoena, she deleted emails off of her server, wiped the server (not, "what, with a cloth,"), and then took bleachbit to it to make sure nobody could see what she deleted and verify that her sole determination about what was "work related" and what wasn't went unchecked and unverified. She then physically smashed devices to preclude them from being examined.
Bill Clinton had an unethical meeting with Loretta Lynch at an airport and we're asked to believe this was just a chance encounter where they talked about grandkids and vacations, and had nothing to do with the ongoing investigation. And, Loretta Lynch, who supposedly recused herself from involvement was taking steps to prevent Comey from notifying Congress that the investigation was continuing. Some recusal, eh? And, Clinton had people in DOJ giving her "heads ups" about events happening in the investigation.
We have admissions regarding deletion of work-related emails contained in Podesta's emails, as well as incestuous relationships behind the scenes with Kadzik of the FBI. We learned today from Wikileaks that Hillary was warned by Podesta to stop sending sensitive information by email in 2014.
Now we find out that hundreds of thousands of emails and other documents are on Weiner's computer....
Her IT person pleaded the 5th to keep himself from incriminating himself for his criminal activity on her behalf. That's what taking the 5th means. Your answer to questions will tend to incriminate you. Other folks, like Cheryl Mills and Samuelson got deals with the Department of Justice, too. Five immunized witnesses apparently were not required to cooperate with federal authorities or with Congress in return for their deals, other than providing a limited amount of immunized information. Why was that? Because the DOJ, led by Loretta Lynch, had not desire to prosecute Clinton, and the whole thing is designed to block the inquiries.
It's so obviously corrupt and incestuous that it's hard to believe a thinking person can continue to blow this off as nothing. I get it. You like her more than Trump. But, doesn't it get a bit embarrassing for you to keep pretending like Clinton hasn't done SOMETHING wrong here?
Clinton keeps trying to deflect by saying this was some Russian plot against her, and Assange of Wikileaks has flat outs aid the material did not come from Russia. There is no evidence it's Russia. At most the Obama Administration (Homeland Security) came out and said that the "methods" used are "consistent" with Russian-related hackers in the past, and that they think Russia has a motive to interfere. That's it. Not a fucking shred of evidence that it was Russia has been advanced.
Anyway -- believe what you want.
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar
