Xamonas Chegwé wrote:HomerJay wrote:But there have been other tragedies, most notable the Bradford Fire disaster (1985) when a stand holding football fans caught fire and 56 people perished, live on TV. This didn't have a tenth of the emotional overload that Hillsborough has generated.
I think it might have had had the victims of the fire been blamed
en masse for setting it.
I don't think the whole mawkishness is set to a backdrop of who blamed the supporters is it?
It's more to do with the squeaky scouse wheel getting the grease, like I said, not all scousers are in favour of the current blub.
But back to the issue at hand, the simplistic blame game of the police is limited in it's scope and there is no reason to believe the behaviour of the fans has some inevitability to do with fluid dynamics.
The reason the gate was opened was due to the large number of fans still trying to get in, opening the side gate had worked before but didn't cause issues because if the central pens were full, club stewards directed people away from them. Those stewards were (mysteriously, AFAIK) absent at this game.
An alternative would be to delay the kickoff, estimates were that even delaying the game by half an hour wouldn't have given all those crowding to get in time to get in (it was a heavily overloaded crowd).
If announcing to the throng that the game would be delayed would have stopped the initial crush OUTSIDE the ground (as was mooted at the inquiries), then it shows that the behaviour of the crowd could be modified, but that the crowd would only respond to particular messages, ie saying you still get to see the game would work, but saying stop pushing people are suffering, would not have been sufficient to modify the behaviour of the crowd.