Seraph wrote:Coito ergo sum wrote:The embargo [...] has EVERYTHING to do with Castro being a dictator.
What? The US administration supported Cuba
despite the fact that Batista was its dictator, and you are trying to tell me that on the day Castro ousted him, the US blockaded Cuba
because Castro is a dictator?

I was quite clear, Seraph. The US embargoed Cuba because Castro took Cuba over by military force AND seized the property of American citizens. In 1992, the US enacted a new law and its policy became that sanctions would remain on Cuba so long as the Cuban government continues to refuse to move toward "democratization and greater respect for human rights." Under the Clinton Administration, the embargo was strengthened, and Bush and Obama both have continued the embargo.
Many countries - including those like Britain, France, Holland, Spain, Portugal, etc. have "supported dictators" in the 20th century. Not sure how that's relevant to their desires to do the right thing half a century later. But, you'll explain it to me, I'm sure.