Donald is here to stay, now what? Cursing and swearing OK

[Brian Peacock]

We have observations, refined datasets, and robust conclusions and practical predictive models built thereon. Climate Science deniers dispute the conclusions but they offer no alternative explanation for what is being observed and recorded - they say it's just wrong just because it's just wrong. When Climate Science deniers start providing robust conclusions, practical predictive models, and refined datasets which account for what we actually observe then they'll be entitled to debate the issue, because then they'll be engaging in science rather than relying on moralising hyperbole and empty rhetoric. lol

[Tero]

Trump's friend Putin gave N Korea oil:
Exclusive: Russian tankers fueled North Korea via transfers at sea - sources
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-nort ... SKBN1EN1OJ

[L'Emmerdeur]

Trump's friend Putin gave N Korea oil:
Exclusive: Russian tankers fueled North Korea via transfers at sea - sources
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-nort ... SKBN1EN1OJ

Anonymous sources = fake news, amirite?

[Tero]

Donald J. Trump
‏

@realDonaldTrump
1h1 hour ago
More
On Taxes: “This is the biggest corporate rate cut ever, going back to the corporate income tax rate of roughly 80 years ago.This is a huge pro-growth stimulus for the economy. Every year the Obama WH overstated how the economy would grow. Now real economics and jobs.” @WSJ Report

Replying to @IRdotnet @realDonaldTrump @WSJ
Why are you using expansionary Fiscal policy when the economy is already great? The federal reserve is doing contractionary policy. This shows your lack of knowledge of how the economy works.

[pErvinalia]

But here we have Trump not talking just about the weather, but Record Cold Temperatures, that ain't just the weather. That's Climate.

It's literally not, particularly when it is a single record.

[Tero]

It's a common conceit of science deniers to deliberately confuse today's weather with global climate trends. Really, this isn't a 'debate' with two sides - this is just about those who respect evidence and those who have a pathological urge to cast uncomfortable facts as unknowns and/or lies.

You are absolutely right.

The Real science deniers are the ones who support the 'unfalsifiable pseudo-science of global warming'.

They use weather and anecdotes all the time, too much rain, too little rain, too hot, too cold, Must be Climate Change!


But here we have Trump not talking just about the weather, but Record Cold Temperatures, that ain't just the weather. That's Climate.
Oh, and these are real temperatures. Not the fudged, adjusted, or estimated data that pseudo-science warmers use to perpetuate their lies.

The number of warm days per month will increase under predictions. In Scandinavia, most of the warming falling in the winter half.

Summer comes and they go ”where is this warming?” It’s in the winter.

You have to look at the years, though. Some years will be colder, some warmer. So, it’s of little use in weather forecasting day by fay. It all falls within a predicted range.

[Animavore]

Wait! Do denialists think a data set from one year in one place constitutes a climate trend?

Also if a data set from one place which is colder than than average constitutes evidence against global warming, then by the same token a higher than average temperature from another place should constitute evidence for, using the same logic.

http://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/e ... 79844.html

But that can't be right! Here we have a record high and a record low happening in two separate places at the same time! Which would suggest, using the denialist method of looking out the window, that climate change is somehow both true and false!

[pErvinalia]

Schrondinger's climate change!

[Tero]

CNN join Fox: FBI is a conspiracy after Trump
http://www.cnn.com/2017/12/29/opinions/ ... index.html

[Brian Peacock]

Wait! Do denialists think a data set from one year in one place constitutes a climate trend?

No, they think that if you have to turn the heating up in the afternoon then Global Warming is a conspiracy.

[pErvinalia]

No, they don't "think" at all. They just do what they are conditioned to do by their faulty brains and a well funded campaign of lies by the fossil fuels industry. It's sad.

[Tero]

Mostly they deny it because they can’t ”feel it”. Sweden has not turned into Spain.

[Animavore]

They're not even good lies. That's what's so fucking stupid about it. And unlike something like creationism it doesn't have age old beliefs to piggy back off of and protect making it hard to understand why It's railed against. It's not even hard to understand like evolution, so it's amazing to me how anyone can be confused by it. It basically say this traps heat and more of this traps more heat. I understood this science aged 11. It's probably the first science I understood.

[tattuchu]

Wait! Do denialists think a data set from one year in one place constitutes a climate trend?

Also if a data set from one place which is colder than than average constitutes evidence against global warming, then by the same token a higher than average temperature from another place should constitute evidence for, using the same logic.

http://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/e ... 79844.html

But that can't be right! Here we have a record high and a record low happening in two separate places at the same time! Which would suggest, using the denialist method of looking out the window, that climate change is somehow both true and false!

No, no. It's not true at all because, on average, everything is just fine

[Brian Peacock]

82% of Ratz members are above average.