rainbow wrote:BoJo for FoSec?eRvin wrote:Theresa is trolling I think. She just appointed Boris as Foreign Secretary.

rainbow wrote:BoJo for FoSec?eRvin wrote:Theresa is trolling I think. She just appointed Boris as Foreign Secretary.
BoJo? is that a thing now?rainbow wrote:BoJo for FoSec?eRvin wrote:Theresa is trolling I think. She just appointed Boris as Foreign Secretary.
Fo shizzle!rainbow wrote:BoJo for FoSec?eRvin wrote:Theresa is trolling I think. She just appointed Boris as Foreign Secretary.
Actually, I expect May to do what was voted, but if she goes through parliaments, it will be reckless stupid MPs who'll try to block the processBrian Peacock wrote:It would be a brave and reckless srupid m PM who would not accept the referendum vote.
Brexit is a reality.
Brexit is on the back burner for a while. When it will be brought forward again no one can say.Svartalf wrote:Actually, I expect May to do what was voted, but if she goes through parliaments, it will be reckless stupid MPs who'll try to block the processBrian Peacock wrote:It would be a brave and reckless srupid m PM who would not accept the referendum vote.
Brexit is a reality.
If it was just Theresa May, that might be possible.Scot Dutchy wrote: Brexit is on the back burner for a while. When it will be brought forward again no one can say.
Scotland is more on her back, than up her sleeve.Scot Dutchy wrote:She has to go through the motions surely.
Remember Scotland? That is still up her sleeve.
I wouldn't put it past her. But I can't imagine how she could possibly pull it off.Scot Dutchy wrote:I sense she has a bit more savvy than many in her party. She could be engineering it for something drastic to happen. With BOJO and Davis you never know.
Exactly my thoughts. As I said with BoJo and co anything is possible which I think was the purpose in the first place.mistermack wrote:I wouldn't put it past her. But I can't imagine how she could possibly pull it off.Scot Dutchy wrote:I sense she has a bit more savvy than many in her party. She could be engineering it for something drastic to happen. With BOJO and Davis you never know.
It would be a huge personal risk, which she doesn't need to take.
And it would have to be something genuine. You know how these things get dissected to the nth degree.
There would be no chance of just pulling a stroke.
I'm pretty sure that she's decided, "we'll do it, but drag our feet, and see if anything comes up".
I concur. May has put off a decision on triggering A50 until after Christmas. Triggering A50 is the start of a 2 year disentanglement process - and it may take longer - which brings us up to the next general election. In the meantime the economic repercussions will become clearer as time goes on. This may lead to a change in public opinion, but May still has to press on with Brexitisation until or unless it becomes clear to most that's it's a non-starter. The next general election may well be fought on a Remain vs Leave footing depending on how things play out.mistermack wrote:Scotland is more on her back, than up her sleeve.Scot Dutchy wrote:She has to go through the motions surely.
Remember Scotland? That is still up her sleeve.
I do think, on balance, that she's decided that not doing brexit is a non-starter, unless something dramatic happens. So she's going through the motions, as you say, but she's resigned to having no choice but to brexit, unless something totally unforseen, and huge, gives her the excuse not to. But I don't think she's holding out much hope of that.
In any case, she's a Tory. The idea of Brexit isn't so awful to her, even if, on balance, she wasn't in favour.
I'll bet that she was pretty close to fifty-fifty on whether to support it or not.
It might have been that she thought that remain would be the winning side, and didn't want to alienate Cameron or Osborne. Who know's what she really thought?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests