Dawkins pissing people off again with his arrogant opinions

[cronus]

In English for a new century of the same....?

[MrJonno]

Not according to Sam Harris. And I think Dawkins is a supporter of Harris's thesis.

Well as moral philosophy doesn't have any absolutes or experts, Sam Harris and Dawkins are wrong if that is what they believe and I'm right

[Xamonas Chegwé]

Not according to Sam Harris. And I think Dawkins is a supporter of Harris's thesis.

Well as moral philosophy doesn't have any absolutes or experts, Sam Harris and Dawkins are wrong if that is what they believe and I'm right

Perhaps you should edit the Wikipedia page on Moral Absolutism, in that case, as it does not agree with your semantic waffle.

[Svartalf]

Don't give him silly ideas XC, there's enough of a vandalism problem on the wiki.

[klr]

The Nazis were not alone in their enthusiasm for all things eugenic ... they weren't even in the forefront of the eugenics "movement" in the first half of the 20th century:



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_for_th ... _Offspring

... they just took it to a whole new level. One result of this association with the Nazis is that it can be very difficult to have any sort of reasoned debate about any law, proposal or anything else that has a whiff of eugenics about it.