Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Locked
Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by Coito ergo sum » Mon May 21, 2012 5:42 pm

maiforpeace wrote:
Tero wrote:Zimmerman behavior is not even OK for a rookie cop.

Rookie cops are itching for "action."
Apparently CES and Kiki are so engrossed with each other and seeing red that other comments are simply ignored. Gives me faith that both of them would be great jurors. :hehe:
You feel Tero's comment is worth a response? What is the value of that comment?

User avatar
kiki5711
Forever with Ekwok
Posts: 3954
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:51 am
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by kiki5711 » Mon May 21, 2012 5:47 pm

Coito ergo sum wrote:
maiforpeace wrote:
Tero wrote:Zimmerman behavior is not even OK for a rookie cop.

Rookie cops are itching for "action."
Apparently CES and Kiki are so engrossed with each other and seeing red that other comments are simply ignored. Gives me faith that both of them would be great jurors. :hehe:
You feel Tero's comment is worth a response? What is the value of that comment?

Doeas it have to have a value? Does it have to have a meaning? Does it have to have a time-line in course of other responses?
Is it prejudice?

Come on now mai, pray tell us why, WHY in this god given doomed planet did you think Tero's comment was worthy of response?.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by Coito ergo sum » Mon May 21, 2012 5:53 pm

kiki5711 wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:
maiforpeace wrote:
Tero wrote:Zimmerman behavior is not even OK for a rookie cop.

Rookie cops are itching for "action."
Apparently CES and Kiki are so engrossed with each other and seeing red that other comments are simply ignored. Gives me faith that both of them would be great jurors. :hehe:
You feel Tero's comment is worth a response? What is the value of that comment?

Doeas it have to have a value? Does it have to have a meaning? Does it have to have a time-line in course of other responses?
Is it prejudice?

Come on now mai, pray tell us why, WHY in this god given doomed planet did you think Tero's comment was worthy of response?.
Well, Mai did seem to say that you and I were ignoring other people's comments. But, what is one supposed to say to a comment about "rookie cops itching for action?"

What would possibly be wrong with skipping valueless comments without meaning? Or, prejudiced comments?

User avatar
maiforpeace
Account Suspended at Member's Request
Posts: 15726
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:41 am
Location: under the redwood trees

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by maiforpeace » Mon May 21, 2012 5:58 pm

No other reason than perhaps you might have a sense of humor?

However, please continue taking each other so seriously...

I'm enjoying Tero's comments so much more than yours anyway. So, assume I highlighted his comments for the benefit of other readers.
Atheists have always argued that this world is all that we have, and that our duty is to one another to make the very most and best of it. ~Christopher Hitchens~
Image
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3534/379 ... 3be9_o.jpg[/imgc]

User avatar
kiki5711
Forever with Ekwok
Posts: 3954
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:51 am
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by kiki5711 » Mon May 21, 2012 6:01 pm

But, what is one supposed to say to a comment about "rookie cops itching for action?"

What would possibly be wrong with skipping valueless comments without meaning? Or, prejudiced comments?
Terro has a way of expressing a thousand words in one sentence and quite correctly. They are not without meaning.

User avatar
kiki5711
Forever with Ekwok
Posts: 3954
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:51 am
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by kiki5711 » Mon May 21, 2012 6:03 pm

maiforpeace wrote:No other reason than perhaps you might have a sense of humor?

However, please continue taking each other so seriously...

I'm enjoying Tero's comments so much more than yours anyway. So, assume I highlighted his comments for the benefit of other readers.

I was just messin w/ya mai..... :flowers:

the reason I keep on responding to seth and ces, is to show them inconsistencies in their logic and I can only do that catching it with their own words.

Oh, and I don't in any way shape of form take ces seriously, just trying to catch him in his own fantasy.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by Coito ergo sum » Mon May 21, 2012 6:05 pm

maiforpeace wrote:No other reason than perhaps you might have a sense of humor?

However, please continue taking each other so seriously...

I'm enjoying Tero's comments so much more than yours anyway. So, assume I highlighted his comments for the benefit of other readers.
You found that funny? A post about how rookie cops are looking for action? Wow -- rolling on the floor, baby! It's fucking gut-busting hilarious, isn't it? I must not have a sense of humor if I didn't find that funny....

Plus, I'm trying to have a serious conversation about this OP. You don't want to, that's up to you. It's not about taking each other seriously, it's about trying to actually have a discussion about the case.

If you felt the comment deserved some sort of response, then I don't see why you didn't post what you thought was relevant. Instead, you decide to complain that others didn't do it for you.

I also love how I'm bitched at for posting too many comments, and then bitched at for skipping one. :biggrin:
Last edited by Coito ergo sum on Mon May 21, 2012 6:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by Coito ergo sum » Mon May 21, 2012 6:06 pm

kiki5711 wrote:
maiforpeace wrote:No other reason than perhaps you might have a sense of humor?

However, please continue taking each other so seriously...

I'm enjoying Tero's comments so much more than yours anyway. So, assume I highlighted his comments for the benefit of other readers.

I was just messin w/ya mai..... :flowers:

the reason I keep on responding to seth and ces, is to show them inconsistencies in their logic and I can only do that catching it with their own words.

Oh, and I don't in any way shape of form take ces seriously, just trying to catch him in his own fantasy.
You haven't shown an inconsistency in any logic, except your own.

User avatar
maiforpeace
Account Suspended at Member's Request
Posts: 15726
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:41 am
Location: under the redwood trees

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by maiforpeace » Mon May 21, 2012 6:19 pm

kiki5711 wrote:
maiforpeace wrote:No other reason than perhaps you might have a sense of humor?

However, please continue taking each other so seriously...

I'm enjoying Tero's comments so much more than yours anyway. So, assume I highlighted his comments for the benefit of other readers.

I was just messin w/ya mai..... :flowers:

the reason I keep on responding to seth and ces, is to show them inconsistencies in their logic and I can only do that catching it with their own words.

Oh, and I don't in any way shape of form take ces seriously, just trying to catch him in his own fantasy.
No you're not, (just messin' with me) - you have been serious. I'm not the least bit offended though. You waver between being grounded and going off because you are passionate about the subject, and I totally love and respect you for it. I give you huge credit for your willingness to do battle. My comment was simply to bring you back.

CES, there's no hope for you. the only time I've ever seen even a glimmer of it was when I totally prostrated myself in humility and begged your forgiveness, and then it lasted about a second. :mrgreen:
Atheists have always argued that this world is all that we have, and that our duty is to one another to make the very most and best of it. ~Christopher Hitchens~
Image
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3534/379 ... 3be9_o.jpg[/imgc]

User avatar
kiki5711
Forever with Ekwok
Posts: 3954
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:51 am
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by kiki5711 » Mon May 21, 2012 6:26 pm

You found that funny? A post about how rookie cops are looking for action? Wow -- rolling on the floor, baby! It's fucking gut-busting hilarious, isn't it? I must not have a sense of humor if I didn't find that funny....
ces, it's not funny as in (laurel and hardy) type of funny, or maybe you just can't tell the difference. It's ok. It's not your fault for being that way.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by Coito ergo sum » Mon May 21, 2012 6:45 pm

kiki5711 wrote:
You found that funny? A post about how rookie cops are looking for action? Wow -- rolling on the floor, baby! It's fucking gut-busting hilarious, isn't it? I must not have a sense of humor if I didn't find that funny....
ces, it's not funny as in (laurel and hardy) type of funny, or maybe you just can't tell the difference. It's ok. It's not your fault for being that way.
You found it humorous? Well, simple humor for simple minds, I guess. :tut:

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by Coito ergo sum » Mon May 21, 2012 6:47 pm

maiforpeace wrote: CES, there's no hope for you. the only time I've ever seen even a glimmer of it was when I totally prostrated myself in humility and begged your forgiveness, and then it lasted about a second. :mrgreen:
Well...we could maybe come to some agreement if you'll be literal about this prostration before me thing... that sounds interesting.... :{D

User avatar
maiforpeace
Account Suspended at Member's Request
Posts: 15726
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:41 am
Location: under the redwood trees

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by maiforpeace » Mon May 21, 2012 7:03 pm

Coito ergo sum wrote:
maiforpeace wrote: CES, there's no hope for you. the only time I've ever seen even a glimmer of it was when I totally prostrated myself in humility and begged your forgiveness, and then it lasted about a second. :mrgreen:
Well...we could maybe come to some agreement if you'll be literal about this prostration before me thing... that sounds interesting.... :{D
I aim to please...
Atheists have always argued that this world is all that we have, and that our duty is to one another to make the very most and best of it. ~Christopher Hitchens~
Image
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3534/379 ... 3be9_o.jpg[/imgc]

User avatar
kiki5711
Forever with Ekwok
Posts: 3954
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:51 am
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by kiki5711 » Mon May 21, 2012 7:05 pm

Coito ergo sum wrote:
kiki5711 wrote:
You found that funny? A post about how rookie cops are looking for action? Wow -- rolling on the floor, baby! It's fucking gut-busting hilarious, isn't it? I must not have a sense of humor if I didn't find that funny....
ces, it's not funny as in (laurel and hardy) type of funny, or maybe you just can't tell the difference. It's ok. It's not your fault for being that way.
You found it humorous? Well, simple humor for simple minds, I guess. :tut:

How did you interpret my reply that I found it humorous in any way? Therein lies your incorrect brain wiring, bringing you wrong information.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by Coito ergo sum » Mon May 21, 2012 7:06 pm

maiforpeace wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:
maiforpeace wrote: CES, there's no hope for you. the only time I've ever seen even a glimmer of it was when I totally prostrated myself in humility and begged your forgiveness, and then it lasted about a second. :mrgreen:
Well...we could maybe come to some agreement if you'll be literal about this prostration before me thing... that sounds interesting.... :{D
I aim to please...
LOL - well, that certainly is most appreciated, and I can't hardly continue with rhetorical jabs and jibes in the face of that.

Suffice to say....
Trigger Warning!!!1! :
Image

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests