Media Bias

[Seabass]

I'm uninformed about the subject.

[Cunt]

If I tossed a gun in my car, drove 2500 miles north to your house and shot your ass, I don't think I could rightly call it self defense, dumbass.

A biased set of rules can often be seen to favour one side. This can result in one group feeling privileged to threaten, insult and spout vitriol freely.

Your make-believe here says a lot about you.

[Seabass]

If I tossed a gun in my car, drove 2500 miles north to your house and shot your ass, I don't think I could rightly call it self defense, dumbass.

A biased set of rules can often be seen to favour one side. This can result in one group feeling privileged to threaten, insult and spout vitriol freely.

Your make-believe here says a lot about you.

So you're going to ignore the obvious point I was making about what can reasonably considered self-defense, and do some victim LARPing instead?

No one spouts insults and vitriol more than you, btw, so I guess you must be part of this privileged group you're talking about.

[Cunt]

dumbass.

[Brian Peacock]

[pErvinalia]

[Joe]

[Brian Peacock]

[JimC]

Cunt, it has become clear in many of your recent posts in multiple threads that you are engaged in malicious trolling, deliberate misrepresentation of other’s posts, disguised ad homs and refusal to engage with other posters in good faith. The following lists of both posts, and excerpts from your posts is only a small representative sample:

viewtopic.php?f=22&p=1906808#p1906808
viewtopic.php?f=22&p=1907311#p1907311
viewtopic.php?f=22&p=1907636#p1907636
viewtopic.php?f=22&p=1907637#p1907637
viewtopic.php?f=22&p=1907665#p1907665
viewtopic.php?f=22&p=1907679#p1907679
viewtopic.php?f=22&p=1907702#p1907702
viewtopic.php?f=22&p=1907824#p1907824

“Dismissing it by naming Tucker is classy though. Way to encourage discussion of this elsewhere, Hermit.”
“You tell a very dramatic story. I'm sure it would fit right in on a newscast”
“You called it a 'protest'. I think I understand how you use that word now.”
“it's probably safer for you to just ignore the whole thing.”
“Gates, who hung around with Epstein after his conviction, has your best interests at heart. Sounds like the kind of classy dude that would protect you from upsetting ideas.”
“It's almost exactly like you are totally ignorant, yet still insisting you must be right because 'science and logic'. Cute though. I enjoy the enthusiasm.”
“Your dodging of the awkward questions reveals your shallow understanding. Your BBC is probably right about you.”
“Until you can tell the story more honestly, I'll simply assume that your keepers, or your ignorance, prevents you.”
“Go on with your ignorant proselytizing. It's soothing, like CNN or BBC telling about how racist your people are.”
“If you can't tell me why Rosenbaum was pissed off, and chasing Rittenhouse, I can dismiss you as ignorant, or willingly lying.”
“I haven't heard any understanding of the facts from him or you. You sound like cheerleaders. That's ok though, I already knew.”
“I understand that you take the side that CNN tells you to take”
"But go ahead and keep ignoring the facts he discussed. It makes you sound smart and fact-checky."
"No one spouts insults and vitriol more than you, btw, so I guess you must be part of this privileged group you're talking about."

You need to take this as a very serious warning. Any continuation of similar posts will result in a suspension of at least the length of previous such suspensions.

[Seabass]

Fox loved Benghazi inquiries, hates January 6 inquiry

[Cunt]

Fauci leaks sound fun and interesting. I'll stick to youtube guidelines though.

[Seabass]

Tucker Carlson calls vaccine requirements “medical Jim Crow”

TUCKER CARLSON (HOST): If you're a middle-aged American -- and some of us are -- you can probably still dimly remember back to what things used to be like in this country, say 13 or 14 months ago. Way back then, before the revolution, pretty much everybody agreed that segregation was the worst thing this country ever did. Forcing certain categories of citizens into separate, lesser accommodations, barring them from public places, treating them like lepers or untouchables, that was completely immoral and wrong. We were told that a lot and most of us strongly agreed. It was wrong.

So, imagine our confusion today looking out across the country. The very same people, literally the very same who just the other day told us that segregation was immoral, are now enforcing segregation. Should we be surprised? Probably not, but we still are. Just this morning, The New York Times informed us that unless you can prove you've taken the injection that the Democratic Party demands you take, you are no longer permitted in bars, comedy clubs, even some dance competitions in the state of New York. You're too dirty to appear in public. You're not welcome near normal people.

Want to watch the NBA playoffs in person? You had better be vaccinated to do that. Otherwise, the New York Knicks will bar you from Madison Square Garden. You can still go see a baseball game if you want to, but be warned you will be sitting in your own roped off section, marinating in your shame with the other disobedient bad people.

Medical Jim Crow has come to America. If we still had water fountains, the unvaccinated would have separate ones.

https://www.mediamatters.org/fox-news/t ... l-jim-crow

[Sean Hayden]

He's banking on your outrage. --fuck'em

[Sean Hayden]

[Brian Peacock]

Why is it so difficult for some people to see the pandemic for what it is, a pressing public health issue? Why do they have to weaponise it for the culture wars?