The EURO may be a long term possibility, and Salmond (like the Libdems up to and including their 2010 manifesto) supported EURO in the past. Before it's problems.DaveDodo007 wrote:A yes vote means Scotland is out of the Sterling zone as that has been made clear. Salmond wants an independent Scotland to be part of the Euro (or how else is Scotland going to be allow to join the EU) though he can't say this out loud because it will scare off the 'don't knows.'
But there is no plan to join the EURO, and contrary to the political bullshit from the anti independence parties & a compliant media, there is no way to force Scotland to join the EURO even if we had to join EU as a brand new accession member (which we wont, as we arent an accession country, we are already in EU with full compliance).
1) there is nothing at all in the treaties which even mention the situation Scotland is in with a yes vote - democratically voting to break the union with England. This is not a new accession country, and there are no treaties to cover such a situation. Many suspect both Scotland and the remaining UK will both need to negotiate ongoing terms. You think the UK with a heavily cut land mass resources and (less so) population will get away with staying on the same basis as now? One of the negotiations between UK and Scotland after independence will be about combined UK and Scottish stance on EU ...
2) you cant be forced to join the EURO against your will. Thats absurd. There is a general acceptance in the treaties that a new accession country (see point 1) will join the EURO at some undefined point in the future, but no way to force it. To even be considered you have to meet certain requirements, and one is being in ERMII for a certain amount of time, and that itself is optional. It's another scare story.