27 dead at Connecticut school, including 14 kids

Locked
Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: 27 dead at Connecticut school, including 14 kids

Post by Seth » Sat Dec 15, 2012 9:17 pm

Făkünamę wrote:Seth arrives on the scene.. /thread

Just as well. It's sickening anyway.
It's sickening that fuckwitted hoplophobes and ideological Marxists are the ones directly responsible for this mass killing as a result of their idiotic policies that keep trained, capable law-abiding armed citizens like me from being in the schools where we can actually do something in time to save the kids.

That nauseates me, that you would use dead children to advance gun control schemes that have exactly zero chance of preventing such incidents in the future. The stupidity and ideological blindness of hoplophobes is costing children their lives. They need to shut the fuck up and let people (like me) who know what to do do what needs to be done to protect the children in our schools.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

User avatar
Ian
Mr Incredible
Posts: 16975
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:42 pm
Location: Washington DC

Re: 27 dead at Connecticut school, including 14 kids

Post by Ian » Sat Dec 15, 2012 9:20 pm

Seth, we all know that so many more kids die from car crashes, leukemia, et cetera et cetera than die from gun violenece. So what. That's a sidestep; we can't do much about those thing except to make cars and traffic laws safer (done that and still doing it), find a cure for leukemia (working on it), etc. The difference here is intent. That's what makes yesterday's case stand out so much, even though there were possibly more kids who died yesterday from leukemia around the country. In this instance, we just might be able to do something about it. But thanks to the pro-gun lobby, the people who have convinced themselves through paranoia that imposing tougher access to guns will eventually lead to an unarmed slave population, actually accomplishing anything which might prevent this from happening yet again is an exceedingly difficult thing to do.

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: 27 dead at Connecticut school, including 14 kids

Post by Jason » Sat Dec 15, 2012 9:21 pm

Gerald McGrew wrote:And did I just see someone post actual data and analyses showing the correlation between more guns and more gun deaths, and tighter restrictions and fewer gun deaths....and that post generally be ignored?

Funny thing to see in a group that has "rational" in its fucking title.
Go read the umpteen gun threads we have. This 'data' and many others have been discussed ad nauseum. There is no correlation ever shown in any study published to date. Claimed, yes.

Funny thing for a group that has 'rational in its fucking title to actually look at the studies and data presented and not just the conclusions eh?

User avatar
Ian
Mr Incredible
Posts: 16975
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:42 pm
Location: Washington DC

Re: 27 dead at Connecticut school, including 14 kids

Post by Ian » Sat Dec 15, 2012 9:29 pm

Gallstones wrote: My ideology didn't kill anyone ever.
The NRA did. They helped to kill 20 schoolkids yesterday.

Anybody who thinks gun laws around the US are as restrictive as they ought to get help to insulate and thereby support that lobby, even if they themselves haven't directly supported the gun lobby. That might not sound fair to those people to whom this applies, but they're the ones who need a wakeup call. Maybe yesterday helped serve as one. Just maybe.

MrJonno
Posts: 3442
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 7:24 am
Contact:

Re: 27 dead at Connecticut school, including 14 kids

Post by MrJonno » Sat Dec 15, 2012 9:31 pm

And once again I'm saddened by the fact that I wasn't in the building with my legally-carried handgun at the time, because things would have gone differently. Oh, wait, even in Colorado, where concealed carry is lawful, one of the few places that I CANNOT lawfully carry my handgun is a K-12 school. Imagine that...a "gun free zone" is, once again and very predictably, the location of a mass killing by an insane gunman.
When there is a massacre there is always someone like you in the building, thats the entire point
When only criminals carry guns the police know exactly who to shoot!

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: 27 dead at Connecticut school, including 14 kids

Post by Seth » Sat Dec 15, 2012 9:51 pm

Ian wrote:Seth, we all know that so many more kids die from car crashes, leukemia, et cetera et cetera than die from gun violenece. So what. That's a sidestep; we can't do much about those thing except to make cars and traffic laws safer (done that and still doing it), find a cure for leukemia (working on it), etc. The difference here is intent.
More kids die each year from intentional injuries inflicted by their parents.
That's what makes yesterday's case stand out so much, even though there were possibly more kids who died yesterday from leukemia around the country. In this instance, we just might be able to do something about it. But thanks to the pro-gun lobby, the people who have convinced themselves through paranoia that imposing tougher access to guns will eventually lead to an unarmed slave population, actually accomplishing anything which might prevent this from happening yet again is an exceedingly difficult thing to do.
The point is that you are dancing on the graves of these children before they are even in the ground in your zeal to forward a gun-control agenda that cannot prevent such things from happening in the future. You're living in a hoplophobic dream world Ian. The guns used in this incident were stolen by the killer and had been lawfully owned by his mother when he killed her and stole them.

Imposing tougher restrictions on access to guns is not going to prevent insane, deranged persons from obtaining guns by theft.

And while we don't know yet, it's highly likely that the killer was not disqualified from owning firearms due to mental illness prior to this incident, and the existing regulation prohibiting anyone under the age of 21 years (the killer was 20 according to the reports I've seen) from owing a handgun didn't do a damned bit of good, now did it?

The issue is not that you want to "do something about it" it's that what you want to do has quite literally nothing whatever to do with protecting schoolchildren against deranged killers, it's purely an anti-gun hoplophobe agenda at work that exploits the deaths of these children rather than looking at things that could actually save lives, like school security design, armed teachers and staff, and trained armed citizens guarding the schools on a voluntary basis.

All the gun haters can see when something like this happens is "we've got to get rid of/control access to guns," which has never stopped ANY criminal from obtaining a firearm illegally with which to commit a crime.

Focus on the real problem for once. The real problem is lax school security and an unwillingness on the part of predominantly liberal/leftist anti-gun teachers and administrators to own up to the fact that unicorn farts and pretty pictures aren't going to protect children against deranged armed killers. The only things that can actually protect the children are physical barriers and procedures to keep them out of the school and armed persons inside the school who are trained and prepared to at least divert the killer's plans by shooting at him, thus giving kids time to escape or find safety.

There simply is no other solution. Banning guns, restricting access...non of that will work, and most of it's been tried, specifically in Connecticut, where a permit to buy, sell or carry a handgun is required, and "assault weapons" are banned, unless lawfully owned prior to 1994 and which have been permitted subsequent to that time by the owner.

It's already illegal under state and federal law to possess so much as a single round of ammunition, much less a firearm, if you do so with the intent to commit a crime with it.

So all the laws in the world won't stop someone intent on committing murder from obtaining and using a firearm illegally to do so.

The only thing that can prevent such mass killings is the presence of law-abiding armed persons on the spot at the time the attack happens who are willing and able to intervene and protect others.

Period.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: 27 dead at Connecticut school, including 14 kids

Post by Seth » Sat Dec 15, 2012 9:52 pm

MrJonno wrote:
And once again I'm saddened by the fact that I wasn't in the building with my legally-carried handgun at the time, because things would have gone differently. Oh, wait, even in Colorado, where concealed carry is lawful, one of the few places that I CANNOT lawfully carry my handgun is a K-12 school. Imagine that...a "gun free zone" is, once again and very predictably, the location of a mass killing by an insane gunman.
When there is a massacre there is always someone like you in the building, thats the entire point
Sadly, no. If there were someone like me (and your personal attack has been reported) such massacres would be much less likely to happen because, unlike some cowards I know, I'm willing to sacrifice my life intervening to protect innocent people against deranged gunmen.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: 27 dead at Connecticut school, including 14 kids

Post by Seth » Sat Dec 15, 2012 9:54 pm

Ian wrote:
Gallstones wrote: My ideology didn't kill anyone ever.
The NRA did. They helped to kill 20 schoolkids yesterday.

Anybody who thinks gun laws around the US are as restrictive as they ought to get help to insulate and thereby support that lobby, even if they themselves haven't directly supported the gun lobby. That might not sound fair to those people to whom this applies, but they're the ones who need a wakeup call. Maybe yesterday helped serve as one. Just maybe.
The problem is that the gun laws are TOO strict and they prevented anyone at the school from being armed so that they could defend the children, and that's NOT an NRA position, that's the product of irrational and illogical thinking like yours.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

User avatar
Kristie
Elastigirl
Posts: 25108
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:14 pm
About me: From there to here, and here to there, funny things are everywhere!
Location: Probably at Target
Contact:

Re: 27 dead at Connecticut school, including 14 kids

Post by Kristie » Sat Dec 15, 2012 9:54 pm

I invite everyone posting in this thread to join me in the fun threads! Positions have been stated, and no one is budging!

Word association, anyone?! :biggrin: Oh, or join me and the Nibs in posting pics of our eyes! :awesome:

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74301
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: 27 dead at Connecticut school, including 14 kids

Post by JimC » Sat Dec 15, 2012 10:03 pm

Cormac wrote:People don't understand that in an environment like a school a knife can be every bit as lethal as a gun. Especially in the hands of someone who has a little training.


This is not an argument either way. While a guy with a gun in hand, safety off could deal with a knife wielding maniac, if the gun was metered or the opponent unarmed, the assailant has a good chance of incapacitating any defender.
What utter nonsense. Yes, a knife can kill, but not a large number in a small time. That is the critical issue. Ready access to highly efficient, easily concealable killing tools by nutters will produce the large scale massacres again and again.

At least an honest gun freak, Mozg, has stated clearly, earlier in the thread, that these sort of massacres are a price she happily pays to own her guns...

My precious, my preciousssss.
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: 27 dead at Connecticut school, including 14 kids

Post by Jason » Sat Dec 15, 2012 10:07 pm

Didn't he use a Bushmaster AR-15 assault rifle? That's not exactly easily concealable. I wonder if this'll prompt the re-banning of assault weapons?

User avatar
Gallstones
Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
Posts: 8888
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.

Re: 27 dead at Connecticut school, including 14 kids

Post by Gallstones » Sat Dec 15, 2012 10:14 pm

I think that families tend to be in denial regarding the extent of mental illness in a family member or they are bewildered by, and frustrated with, a system that isn't helping them get effective help. Plus some people react inexplicabley to prescribed medications and become violent or suicidal.
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010

The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter

User avatar
Rum
Absent Minded Processor
Posts: 37285
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
Contact:

Re: 27 dead at Connecticut school, including 14 kids

Post by Rum » Sat Dec 15, 2012 10:24 pm

Seth is mentally deranged and a total shit head to boot. Hard to top really.

User avatar
Gallstones
Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
Posts: 8888
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.

Re: 27 dead at Connecticut school, including 14 kids

Post by Gallstones » Sat Dec 15, 2012 10:33 pm

Rum wrote:Seth is mentally deranged and a total shit head to boot. Hard to top really.
This is the kind of quality contribution anti gun people are capable of.
It serves as an example for us all.
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010

The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter

User avatar
macdoc
Twitcher
Posts: 9213
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:20 pm
Location: BirdWing Home FNQ
Contact:

Re: 27 dead at Connecticut school, including 14 kids

Post by macdoc » Sat Dec 15, 2012 10:37 pm

What happens if it's true GS??? - I tend to agree with the most of it from evidence presented.....

••••

as for the "too soon" aspect....
If there was anything as loud as the gunfire that erupted on a sunny morning in Connecticut Friday, it was the roar of disapproval — and disbelief — that issued after White House spokesman Jay Carney told a news briefing that “today is not the day” to discuss U.S. gun control.

Social media lit up with sparks of anger and rage, and the world was left wondering: What will it take for America to tackle its devastating gun problem? If not the slaughter of 28 people, including at least 20 children, then what?

It was the seventh mass shooting of the year and the second deadliest in U.S. history, behind only the 2007 Virginia Tech massacre in which 33 died.

It is America’s haunting, recurring nightmare.

Last year alone, more than 30,000 Americans died from gunfire.

The magnitude of the tragedy moved President Barack Obama to tears as he told the nation, “our hearts are broken today.”

“They had their entire lives ahead of them,” the president said of the children who died, “birthdays, graduations, weddings, kids of their own.”

He said the time had arrived for America to take “meaningful action.” But he did not say what form that action might take.

Even in the face of a devastating national tragedy, it seems a recently re-elected president of the United States must tread carefully on an issue so embedded in American life — and the Second Amendment guarantee that grants Americans the right to bear arms.

America’s gun lobby, led by the National Rifle Association, declined comment following the horror, saying it would make no statement, “until the facts are thoroughly known.”

But what facts did emerge Friday were that 20-year-old Adam Lanza brought three weapons, two handguns — a Glock and a Sig Sauer — as well as a .223-calibre semi-automatic rifle, all of which were recovered. The weapons require a permit by law, but it is not known whether he had one.

Law enforcement officials told NBC News the guns were registered in the name of his mother, Nancy Lanza, a school teacher. Lanza shot her to death before taking his own life.

Reports said Lanza was dressed in black and wore a bulletproof vest.

In the Aurora, Colo., massacre, gunman James Holmes used the popular AR-15 to kill 12 and wound 58 in just 120 seconds at a packed screening of a Batman movie in July. He had also donned a bulletproof vest.

Lanza’s massacre was more than twice as deadly, apparently confined to two classrooms. It is not yet known how much ammunition he used or how long the gunfire lasted.

But it provoked pity and sorrow for the families of the slain, and demands for action.

New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg was perhaps the most eloquent in framing the frustration of many Americans.

The president talking about “meaningful action” did not go far enough, the mayor said.

“The country needs him to send a bill to Congress,” he said.


“With all the carnage from gun violence in our country, it’s still almost impossible to believe that a mass shooting in a kindergarten class could happen,” he observed. “Not even kindergarteners learning their ABCs are safe.

“We heard after Columbine that it was ‘too soon’ to talk about gun laws.
We heard it after Virginia Tech.
After Tucson and Aurora and Oak Creek.
And now we are hearing it again.”
go make your case to Mayor Bloomberg and the thousands of others that declare "it's not too soon....it needs to be now!! ".....:mad:

Connecticut school shooting: As America mourns, action demanded on gun control - thestar.com
Resident in Cairns Australia • Current ride> 2014 Honda CB500F • Travel photos https://500px.com/p/macdoc?view=galleries

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests