Republicans: continued

[Cunt]

The evidence which would justify Paul's desire to hold a hearing. The evidence which makes sense of his insistence that we take action. Please tell me it's more than Trump's insistence that he was cheated!

What's the evidence?

This kind of question convinces me that you haven't seen any of the evidence.

I may be wrong about that, but it kind of makes an interesting point, since there were several videos circulating, which showed suspicious behavior. There were whistleblowers, a couple from the post office.

Those are so common, I'm thinking you HAVE seen them, but they have been addressed to your satisfaction. If you haven't seen them, I can dig a bit, but it might point to you not getting exposed to both sides from your media choices.

[macdoc]

Tell us oh wise one ....do you think there was ever "two sides" to the reality of human induced climate change.?

[Cunt]

Tell us oh wise one ....do you think there was ever "two sides" to the reality of human induced climate change.?

Only where it intersects with politics.

[Cunt]

This sounds pretty 'Republican'

In a diverse society, efforts to restrict speech can become a tool to silence critics, or oppress minorities...the strongest weapon against hateful speech is not repression, it is more speech.

[Cunt]

[Sean Hayden]

What's the evidence?

[Brian Peacock]

Why would you ask ME for such?

I just mentioned what Senator Paul referenced. If you want to comment on that, you can. If you want to continue to insist that there is no evidence, because the courts declined to hear it, that's ok too.

For me though, he sounds a lot more reasonable than most of the 'certainty' gang. (certain in either direction I mean)

What sounds more reasonable?

[JimC]

Trump supporters talk loud about "lots of evidence", but it never shows up, and no court (conservative or otherwise) has seen evidence that's even enough to take to trial.

This parrot has shuffled off this mortal coil...

[Brian Peacock]

The evidence which would justify Paul's desire to hold a hearing. The evidence which makes sense of his insistence that we take action. Please tell me it's more than Trump's insistence that he was cheated!

What's the evidence?

This kind of question convinces me that you haven't seen any of the evidence...

What evidence?

[Tero]

http://karireport.blogspot.com/2020/12/ ... un-of.html

[Tero]

It's really hard to stand out now. What with Trump, senators saying all kinds of shit (the new thing is: this new impeachment of an ex president is unconstitutional )

BUT she stands out. FaceBook supported it then, cause FREEDOM

Marjorie Taylor Greene indicated support for executing prominent Democrats in 2018 and 2019 before running for Congress.

Greene, who represents Georgia's 14th Congressional District, frequently posted far-right extremist and debunked conspiracy theories on her page, including the baseless QAnon conspiracy which casts former President Donald Trump in an imagined battle against a sinister cabal of Democrats and celebrities who abuse children.
In one post, from January 2019, Greene liked a comment that said "a bullet to the head would be quicker" to remove House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. In other posts, Greene liked comments about executing FBI agents who, in her eyes, were part of the "deep state" working against Trump.

Last week Greene faced calls to resign from the survivors of the Parkland shooting survivors after Media Matters reported she agreed with comments calling the 2018 shooting a "false flag" operation, which refers to acts that are designed by perpetrators to be made to look like they were carried out by other individuals or groups.
CNN's KFile found additional comments from Greene where she called David Hogg, a survivor and activist, "#littleHitler" and spread a conspiracy that he was a "bought and paid little pawn" and actor.

Greene, who has embraced and spread the baseless conspiracy theory about a "deep state" working to usurp Trump's agenda, suggested in Facebook posts that FBI agents disloyal to Trump were traitors.
She liked a comment that said, "Trump already said there were some great ones working with FBI but some have fallen and quite frankly need to be hung for TREASON!" Another she liked said, "These Traitors need to be put to death as an example of what will no longer be tolerated in our country!!!"

https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/26/politics ... index.html

[Cunt]

Why would you ask ME for such?

I just mentioned what Senator Paul referenced. If you want to comment on that, you can. If you want to continue to insist that there is no evidence, because the courts declined to hear it, that's ok too.

For me though, he sounds a lot more reasonable than most of the 'certainty' gang. (certain in either direction I mean)

What sounds more reasonable?

The group claiming the election was 'certainly' stolen, haven't provided enough (how much is 'enough'?) evidence to the people, or the courts.

The group claiming the election was certainly without evidence of fraud, must deny clear evidence, such as USPS whistleblowers etc.

Neither position is 'true', whatever the evidence is.

I think the most reasonable position is to hear guys like Senator Paul out, and so far nothing he said makes me think he's unreasonable.

[Sean Hayden]

What's the evidence?

[Joe]

Well, Karl Rove's nickname is "turd blossom" so he might be a little thin skinned.

Seriously, Rove and Paul are just playing the outrage card. They don't give a crap about this, other than to stir up their base and undercut Biden. It's reflexive with these hacks.

So what Paul said about the election fraud evidence is 'playing the outrage card'?

He sounds a lot more informed than most, about what the courts heard, and what they didn't.

Of course, if he is against Biden, the media MUST destroy him.

Not that the media is partisan or anything. It's just the right thing to do...

You really ought to read the thread Cunt. You're totally off topic and trolling again.

[Cunt]

What's the evidence?

Simple enough to find, if you want to of course.

One example is the https://www.projectveritas.com/news/bre ... -the-only/

USPS whistleblower.

Of course, PV might not fit well in a 'Republicans' thread, but I think of them as 'very republican friendly'.