The Ethics of Shooting Republicans

User avatar
Brian Peacock
Tipping cows since 1946
Posts: 39971
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
About me: Ablate me:
Location: Location: Location:
Contact:

Re: The Ethics of Shooting Republicans

Post by Brian Peacock » Thu Jun 15, 2017 6:51 am

Forty Two wrote:
Brian Peacock wrote:Being critical of President Donald Trump marks you out as a violent extremist now I guess.
Not sure how you concluded that. Shooting people up makes you a violent extremist. Politics was apparently this joker's motivation. That doesn't mean that every anti-Trumper is a violent extremist.

There are plenty, however, who have been engaging in so much violent rhetoric, that if the shoe were on the other foot, and it ere anti-Hillary folks who were talking about punching and beating up the opposition, and right wingers rioting on college campuses, etc., you can bet dollars to donuts that a violent act like this would be blamed on the "violent rhetoric" and the "climate" created thereby.
Yeah, you say that, but it's still kinda nice'n'easy to associate the violence with membership of one side of another eh...

Forty Two wrote:
Tero wrote:take one part each
1 Trump
2 america
3 gun nut

Shake and see what comes out.
A socialist, Bernie-bros gun nut?
Everyone needs to chill the fuck out.
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.

.

"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."

Frank Zappa

"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.

User avatar
pErvinalia
On the good stuff
Posts: 60767
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
Location: dystopia
Contact:

Re: The Ethics of Shooting Republicans

Post by pErvinalia » Thu Jun 15, 2017 8:22 am

Nah, the Americans need another civil war. If the smart ones lose then the rest of the world can isolate the US as a rogue state. :coffee:
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.

User avatar
rainbow
Posts: 13763
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:10 am
About me: Egal wie dicht du bist, Goethe war Dichter
Where ever you are, Goethe was a Poet.
Location: Africa
Contact:

Re: The Ethics of Shooting Republicans

Post by rainbow » Thu Jun 15, 2017 8:38 am

pErvin wrote:Nah, the Americans need another civil war. If the smart ones lose then the rest of the world can isolate the US as a rogue state. :coffee:
Lefties can't shoot straight, they would probably end up killing their own.
:nono:
I call bullshit - Alfred E Einstein
BArF−4

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74171
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: The Ethics of Shooting Republicans

Post by JimC » Thu Jun 15, 2017 9:06 am

rainbow wrote:
pErvin wrote:Nah, the Americans need another civil war. If the smart ones lose then the rest of the world can isolate the US as a rogue state. :coffee:
Lefties can't shoot straight, they would probably end up killing their own.
:nono:
Centrists like myself, however, are fucking sharpshooters.

Back in the day, no bunny in Oz was safe when I was on the prowl...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41047
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: The Ethics of Shooting Republicans

Post by Svartalf » Thu Jun 15, 2017 9:09 am

pErvin wrote:Awkward:
19113896_10158776044255484_1810856833342132399_n.jpg
Mmmh, and the GOP congress had been abusing its power and position of late?

I despise rand paul as much as his eponym.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Brian Peacock
Tipping cows since 1946
Posts: 39971
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
About me: Ablate me:
Location: Location: Location:
Contact:

Re: The Ethics of Shooting Republicans

Post by Brian Peacock » Thu Jun 15, 2017 9:15 am

JimC wrote:Back in the day, no bunny in Oz was safe when I was on the prowl...
Pervert!
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.

.

"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."

Frank Zappa

"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74171
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: The Ethics of Shooting Republicans

Post by JimC » Thu Jun 15, 2017 9:15 am

:hehe:
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
pErvinalia
On the good stuff
Posts: 60767
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
Location: dystopia
Contact:

Re: The Ethics of Shooting Republicans

Post by pErvinalia » Thu Jun 15, 2017 9:44 am

I'm a top shooter too. Don't have any guns, though.
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.

User avatar
Forty Two
Posts: 14978
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
Contact:

Re: The Ethics of Shooting Republicans

Post by Forty Two » Thu Jun 15, 2017 11:03 am

NineBerry wrote:So, I saw Paul Ryan in the parliament, while chairing the parliament, leading a prayer and crossing himself. What the fuck is this, America?!?
While I don't support government mandated prayers, I do have a tolerance for voluntary prayers if that what someone with the floor wants to do.

In the UK Parliament, both the House of Commons and the Senate are opened with mandatory prayers, and they must be Christian prayers. What the fuck is that, UK? http://www.parliament.uk/about/how/business/prayers/

In Ireland, the Dail Parliament is opened, by law, with a prayer - a session may not open without a prayer. What the fuck is this, Ireland?

In Australia, they say the Lord's Prayer before every Senate hearing. What the fuck is this, Australia?

In Canada, they open House of Commons and Senate sessions with a prayer. What the fuck is this, Canada?

Sweden's Parliament has its own Christian chapel and a prayer room. What the fuck is this, Sweden?

Israel's Parliament has a Jewish temple and prayer room. What the fuck is this, Israel?

Turkey's Parliament has a Mosque. What the fuck is this, Turkey?

I mean, leading a prayer and crossing oneself? Ludicrous! Only in America...

...3...2...1...for response to the effect of - "yes that's true, but it's not really taken seriously in Europe...not like in the US...it's bad in the US, but it's just sort of a cultural tradition in other countries..."
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar

User avatar
Forty Two
Posts: 14978
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
Contact:

Re: The Ethics of Shooting Republicans

Post by Forty Two » Thu Jun 15, 2017 11:08 am

Brian Peacock wrote:
Forty Two wrote:
Brian Peacock wrote:Being critical of President Donald Trump marks you out as a violent extremist now I guess.
Not sure how you concluded that. Shooting people up makes you a violent extremist. Politics was apparently this joker's motivation. That doesn't mean that every anti-Trumper is a violent extremist.

There are plenty, however, who have been engaging in so much violent rhetoric, that if the shoe were on the other foot, and it ere anti-Hillary folks who were talking about punching and beating up the opposition, and right wingers rioting on college campuses, etc., you can bet dollars to donuts that a violent act like this would be blamed on the "violent rhetoric" and the "climate" created thereby.
Yeah, you say that, but it's still kinda nice'n'easy to associate the violence with membership of one side of another eh...
That's precisely my point. The fact that this guy was a leftist Bernie Bros says nothing about them in general, and is not the fault of the violent rhetoric coming out of the left these days. However, if the shooter was a Trump supporter, and the victims Democrats, you can't seriously dispute that the major media outlets would be out there suggesting that Trump's rhetoric and the rhetoric of his supporters contributed to a climate of hate, fear and violence that caused the shooter to act... that would be the lead. I think everyone ought to be able to see that. It's what happened when Gabby Giffords was shot, etc. it was all the fault of the "martial rhetoric" of Sarah Palin and other Republicans. So, it's a bit rich to be surprised when, after months of open calls for the assassination of the President and violent resistance to his "regime," that some folks are going to try to blame THAT rhetoric and activity for the shooting.


Brian Peacock wrote:
Forty Two wrote:
Tero wrote:take one part each
1 Trump
2 america
3 gun nut

Shake and see what comes out.
A socialist, Bernie-bros gun nut?
Everyone needs to chill the fuck out.
Of course, NOW they have to chill the fuck out. LOL. The shooter was a leftist progressive, so everyone chill out. LOL
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar

User avatar
Forty Two
Posts: 14978
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
Contact:

Re: The Ethics of Shooting Republicans

Post by Forty Two » Thu Jun 15, 2017 11:10 am

pErvin wrote:Nah, the Americans need another civil war. If the smart ones lose then the rest of the world can isolate the US as a rogue state. :coffee:
Our ace-in-the-hole is that we have a stronger military than the next 25 countries combined.... if we go rogue, we ain't gonna be too fun to deal with.
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar

User avatar
Forty Two
Posts: 14978
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
Contact:

Re: The Ethics of Shooting Republicans

Post by Forty Two » Thu Jun 15, 2017 11:12 am

pErvin wrote:I'm a top shooter too. Don't have any guns, though.
You said it, Mary.
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar

User avatar
Brian Peacock
Tipping cows since 1946
Posts: 39971
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
About me: Ablate me:
Location: Location: Location:
Contact:

Re: The Ethics of Shooting Republicans

Post by Brian Peacock » Thu Jun 15, 2017 11:19 am

Forty Two wrote:...

Everyone needs to chill the fuck out.
Of course, NOW they have to chill the fuck out. LOL. The shooter was a leftist progressive, so everyone chill out. LOL[/quote]

So only the so-called leftist progressives need to chill out then?
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.

.

"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."

Frank Zappa

"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.

User avatar
Forty Two
Posts: 14978
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
Contact:

Re: The Ethics of Shooting Republicans

Post by Forty Two » Thu Jun 15, 2017 11:20 am

Brian Peacock wrote:
So only the so-called leftist progressives need to chill out then?
I didn't say anybody needed to chill out. You said it.
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar

User avatar
rainbow
Posts: 13763
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:10 am
About me: Egal wie dicht du bist, Goethe war Dichter
Where ever you are, Goethe was a Poet.
Location: Africa
Contact:

Re: The Ethics of Shooting Republicans

Post by rainbow » Thu Jun 15, 2017 11:41 am

Forty Two wrote:
pErvin wrote:Nah, the Americans need another civil war. If the smart ones lose then the rest of the world can isolate the US as a rogue state. :coffee:
Our ace-in-the-hole is that we have a stronger military than the next 25 countries combined.... if we go rogue, we ain't gonna be too fun to deal with.
No the US spends more money. That doesn't relate to strength.

:thinks: When last did the US actually win a war? :thinks:

:ab: The Invasion of Grenada was a 1983 United States–led invasion of the Caribbean island nation of Grenada, with a population of about 91,000 located 160 kilometres north of Venezuela, that resulted in a U.S. victory within a matter of weeks :ab:
I call bullshit - Alfred E Einstein
BArF−4

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests