Time to suspend suspended sentences

Post Reply
User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74217
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Time to suspend suspended sentences

Post by JimC » Sat Mar 14, 2015 6:12 am

Sean Hayden wrote:I suspect for many people the best option is to just do their time and go home.
Like marriage...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Rum
Absent Minded Processor
Posts: 37285
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
Contact:

Re: Time to suspend suspended sentences

Post by Rum » Sat Mar 14, 2015 9:04 am

Have you any evidence for this? Especially considering that the USA incarcerates a greater proportion of its citizens than any other 'Western' country? I am sure cost is part of the equation but it is not the primary reason for such an approach - at least in the rather more civilized countries of the developed world.
Seth wrote:The main reason for suspended sentences is fiscal. They do it because it's fucking expensive to put someone in jail, even for a short time, and the jails are always overcrowded anyway. So, suspended sentences are a desperate attempt to scare first-timers into not offending again by putting them through the meat-grinder of the criminal justice system (which costs a lot in and of itself) and then letting them off with a stern warning and a sword of Damocles hanging over their head for a time. Depending on the seriousness of the crime, it often works. They also do what's called "deferred prosecution," particularly for juveniles, which means that if the defendant doesn't re-offend, the original charge (of which he has not yet been convicted) is expunged from his record so that it will not affect things like getting into college or getting a job.

User avatar
mistermack
Posts: 15093
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
About me: Never rong.
Contact:

Re: Time to suspend suspended sentences

Post by mistermack » Sat Mar 14, 2015 12:45 pm

Part of the reason for a suspended sentence is fiscal to be sure. But another part, as someone else pointed out, is that prison or youth detention is a school-room for crime.
Mixing with habitual criminals turns first-timers into better and more skillful offenders.
So I agree, you can't suddenly do away with the suspended sentence option.

Change the system first, so that there is no association at all between criminals except those in for very long sentences.

If they crave human contact, you can let volunteers in to visit them. Or let them chat to volunteers online. Otherwise, fuck em, if no volunteer comes forwards.

If they don't like it, good. It's a better deterrent.

It would be cheaper and safer for the prison staff too, if they were not dealing with groups of offenders together. And much easier to keep drugs away from the inmates.
Loads of people start on drugs in prison, and stay hooked when they come out. That's why they re-offend so much.
Like BG says, I have no objection to supplying video entertainment, or PCs or making life cushy.
Who cares? You're locked up on your own, and that's enough.

Under those conditions, you could then eventually do away with the suspended element, without producing trained criminals when they come out.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.

User avatar
pErvinalia
On the good stuff
Posts: 60840
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
Location: dystopia
Contact:

Re: Time to suspend suspended sentences

Post by pErvinalia » Sat Mar 14, 2015 12:58 pm

Xamonas Chegwé wrote:
Rum wrote:Most crime is committed by young people after all (they tend to peak at 17) and most 'grow out of it'.
In volume terms, certainly. In monetary terms, however, most is committed by middle-aged businessmen. Trouble is, the impact of an OAP pensioner being mugged for her handbag is immediate and visceral, while the impact of VAT fraud and tax evasion is far harder to evaluate. :tea:
Why do you hate freedom?!? :ask:
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.

User avatar
mistermack
Posts: 15093
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
About me: Never rong.
Contact:

Re: Time to suspend suspended sentences

Post by mistermack » Sat Mar 14, 2015 1:34 pm

On the subject of deterrence, maybe the habitual low level criminals don't have the imagination to work out that things go wrong, and they will get caught eventually. So maybe prison isn't much of a deterrent for them.
But I can assure you that it's always been a deterrent for me. And most of the people I know.
So maybe it doesn't deter the undeterrable. But it certainly deters a lot of people.
Whether they would have committed crime is debatable. I have myself on occasion, but pretty minor stuff that didn't include dishonesty. And once long ago, a pretty violent crime.
I'm sure there would have been a lot more without the threat of prison lurking.
It creates an attitude of mind. Sort of puts crime into the ''last resort'' bracket. Even if it doesn't one hundred percent stop it, I'm sure it cuts it down a huge amount.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: Time to suspend suspended sentences

Post by Seth » Sat Mar 14, 2015 6:01 pm

Sean Hayden wrote:I suspect for many people the best option is to just do their time and go home.
Many convicts feel that way too. If you get out early, you can be subjected to long-term probation/parole, whereas if you serve your full time, once they release you they can't screw with you anymore.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

User avatar
Rum
Absent Minded Processor
Posts: 37285
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
Contact:

Re: Time to suspend suspended sentences

Post by Rum » Sat Mar 14, 2015 6:15 pm

mistermack wrote:On the subject of deterrence, maybe the habitual low level criminals don't have the imagination to work out that things go wrong, and they will get caught eventually. So maybe prison isn't much of a deterrent for them.
But I can assure you that it's always been a deterrent for me. And most of the people I know.
So maybe it doesn't deter the undeterrable. But it certainly deters a lot of people.
Whether they would have committed crime is debatable. I have myself on occasion, but pretty minor stuff that didn't include dishonesty. And once long ago, a pretty violent crime.
I'm sure there would have been a lot more without the threat of prison lurking.
It creates an attitude of mind. Sort of puts crime into the ''last resort'' bracket. Even if it doesn't one hundred percent stop it, I'm sure it cuts it down a huge amount.
This surprises me. I think I can say in all honesty that the fear of being caught has never stopped me committing a crime - and except for some very minor stuff as a student, I never have. The desire to 'do the right thing' is what makes me someone who stays within the law. I'm not sure what that says except I am well socialised!

Sean Hayden
Microagressor
Posts: 18978
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:55 pm
Contact:

Re: Time to suspend suspended sentences

Post by Sean Hayden » Sat Mar 14, 2015 6:27 pm

Rum wrote:
mistermack wrote:On the subject of deterrence, maybe the habitual low level criminals don't have the imagination to work out that things go wrong, and they will get caught eventually. So maybe prison isn't much of a deterrent for them.
But I can assure you that it's always been a deterrent for me. And most of the people I know.
So maybe it doesn't deter the undeterrable. But it certainly deters a lot of people.
Whether they would have committed crime is debatable. I have myself on occasion, but pretty minor stuff that didn't include dishonesty. And once long ago, a pretty violent crime.
I'm sure there would have been a lot more without the threat of prison lurking.
It creates an attitude of mind. Sort of puts crime into the ''last resort'' bracket. Even if it doesn't one hundred percent stop it, I'm sure it cuts it down a huge amount.
This surprises me. I think I can say in all honesty that the fear of being caught has never stopped me committing a crime - and except for some very minor stuff as a student, I never have. The desire to 'do the right thing' is what makes me someone who stays within the law. I'm not sure what that says except I am well socialised!
I agree Rum, reasonable people don't commit crimes because they care about the people hurt by it. Youngsters are often unreasonable and this can be worse for some than others obviously.

However, I have to ask just to make another point: is LSD legal where you're at Rum? Here LSD is not something you want to get caught with. I think the majority of our prisoners are drug offenders/addicts.

User avatar
Rum
Absent Minded Processor
Posts: 37285
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
Contact:

Re: Time to suspend suspended sentences

Post by Rum » Sat Mar 14, 2015 6:41 pm

Sean Hayden wrote:
Rum wrote:
mistermack wrote:On the subject of deterrence, maybe the habitual low level criminals don't have the imagination to work out that things go wrong, and they will get caught eventually. So maybe prison isn't much of a deterrent for them.
But I can assure you that it's always been a deterrent for me. And most of the people I know.
So maybe it doesn't deter the undeterrable. But it certainly deters a lot of people.
Whether they would have committed crime is debatable. I have myself on occasion, but pretty minor stuff that didn't include dishonesty. And once long ago, a pretty violent crime.
I'm sure there would have been a lot more without the threat of prison lurking.
It creates an attitude of mind. Sort of puts crime into the ''last resort'' bracket. Even if it doesn't one hundred percent stop it, I'm sure it cuts it down a huge amount.
This surprises me. I think I can say in all honesty that the fear of being caught has never stopped me committing a crime - and except for some very minor stuff as a student, I never have. The desire to 'do the right thing' is what makes me someone who stays within the law. I'm not sure what that says except I am well socialised!
I agree Rum, reasonable people don't commit crimes because they care about the people hurt by it. Youngsters are often unreasonable and this can be worse for some than others obviously.

However, I have to ask just to make another point: is LSD legal where you're at Rum? Here LSD is not something you want to get caught with. I think the majority of our prisoners are drug offenders/addicts.
It was drugs I was referring to as the 'minor' offences I committed as a young man. LSD, cannabis where the main ones. I took some other stuff too - mainly legal prescription drugs. From what I read the drug of choice for many prisoners is heroin, which I never (thanks the gods) tried.

Sean Hayden
Microagressor
Posts: 18978
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:55 pm
Contact:

Re: Time to suspend suspended sentences

Post by Sean Hayden » Sat Mar 14, 2015 6:47 pm

Seth wrote:
Sean Hayden wrote:I suspect for many people the best option is to just do their time and go home.
Many convicts feel that way too. If you get out early, you can be subjected to long-term probation/parole, whereas if you serve your full time, once they release you they can't screw with you anymore.
Yep, and that's what makes Jim's analogy somewhat applicable i.e. entering into a life long abusive relationship that can't be annulled. Many people accepting suspended sentences may eventually end up doing more time than guys with more offenses on their record, just none happening while they were serving a suspended sentence. That's the reasoning anyway. We'd need to see some numbers to know for sure.

Sean Hayden
Microagressor
Posts: 18978
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:55 pm
Contact:

Re: Time to suspend suspended sentences

Post by Sean Hayden » Sat Mar 14, 2015 6:50 pm

Rum wrote:
Sean Hayden wrote:
Rum wrote:
mistermack wrote:On the subject of deterrence, maybe the habitual low level criminals don't have the imagination to work out that things go wrong, and they will get caught eventually. So maybe prison isn't much of a deterrent for them.
But I can assure you that it's always been a deterrent for me. And most of the people I know.
So maybe it doesn't deter the undeterrable. But it certainly deters a lot of people.
Whether they would have committed crime is debatable. I have myself on occasion, but pretty minor stuff that didn't include dishonesty. And once long ago, a pretty violent crime.
I'm sure there would have been a lot more without the threat of prison lurking.
It creates an attitude of mind. Sort of puts crime into the ''last resort'' bracket. Even if it doesn't one hundred percent stop it, I'm sure it cuts it down a huge amount.
This surprises me. I think I can say in all honesty that the fear of being caught has never stopped me committing a crime - and except for some very minor stuff as a student, I never have. The desire to 'do the right thing' is what makes me someone who stays within the law. I'm not sure what that says except I am well socialised!
I agree Rum, reasonable people don't commit crimes because they care about the people hurt by it. Youngsters are often unreasonable and this can be worse for some than others obviously.

However, I have to ask just to make another point: is LSD legal where you're at Rum? Here LSD is not something you want to get caught with. I think the majority of our prisoners are drug offenders/addicts.
It was drugs I was referring to as the 'minor' offences I committed as a young man. LSD, cannabis where the main ones. I took some other stuff too - mainly legal prescription drugs. From what I read the drug of choice for many prisoners is heroin, which I never (thanks the gods) tried.
But they're only minor to you right? What are the thoughts of the powers that be regarding these minor crimes? Lots of people in the states can't believe they're doing time for such "minor" offenses.

User avatar
laklak
Posts: 21022
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:07 pm
About me: My preferred pronoun is "Massah"
Location: Tannhauser Gate
Contact:

Re: Time to suspend suspended sentences

Post by laklak » Sat Mar 14, 2015 6:58 pm

I think a suspended sentence should mean getting strung up by the balls. That'll larn 'em.
Yeah well that's just, like, your opinion, man.

User avatar
Blind groper
Posts: 3997
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
About me: From New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Time to suspend suspended sentences

Post by Blind groper » Sat Mar 14, 2015 7:02 pm

I think that most intelligent and educated people would not accept that prison for minor drug 'crimes' is OK. If someone smokes marijuana, I would call them unwise but not criminal.

Genuine crime involves the creation of a victim. If no victim, then no crime. Sometimes, of course, that principle is averaged over many people. Driving drunk is a crime, even though only a few drunk drivers create victims. But those few are enough.

User avatar
Rum
Absent Minded Processor
Posts: 37285
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
Contact:

Re: Time to suspend suspended sentences

Post by Rum » Sat Mar 14, 2015 7:04 pm

Sean Hayden wrote:
Rum wrote:
Sean Hayden wrote:
Rum wrote:
mistermack wrote:On the subject of deterrence, maybe the habitual low level criminals don't have the imagination to work out that things go wrong, and they will get caught eventually. So maybe prison isn't much of a deterrent for them.
But I can assure you that it's always been a deterrent for me. And most of the people I know.
So maybe it doesn't deter the undeterrable. But it certainly deters a lot of people.
Whether they would have committed crime is debatable. I have myself on occasion, but pretty minor stuff that didn't include dishonesty. And once long ago, a pretty violent crime.
I'm sure there would have been a lot more without the threat of prison lurking.
It creates an attitude of mind. Sort of puts crime into the ''last resort'' bracket. Even if it doesn't one hundred percent stop it, I'm sure it cuts it down a huge amount.
This surprises me. I think I can say in all honesty that the fear of being caught has never stopped me committing a crime - and except for some very minor stuff as a student, I never have. The desire to 'do the right thing' is what makes me someone who stays within the law. I'm not sure what that says except I am well socialised!
I agree Rum, reasonable people don't commit crimes because they care about the people hurt by it. Youngsters are often unreasonable and this can be worse for some than others obviously.

However, I have to ask just to make another point: is LSD legal where you're at Rum? Here LSD is not something you want to get caught with. I think the majority of our prisoners are drug offenders/addicts.
It was drugs I was referring to as the 'minor' offences I committed as a young man. LSD, cannabis where the main ones. I took some other stuff too - mainly legal prescription drugs. From what I read the drug of choice for many prisoners is heroin, which I never (thanks the gods) tried.
But they're only minor to you right? What are the thoughts of the powers that be regarding these minor crimes? Lots of people in the states can't believe they're doing time for such "minor" offenses.
It is a fair point, but most people would not consider any other class of crime or set of laws as stupidly inapplicable to them. It is hard to imagine a burglar suggesting that he burgles because he does not believe the law on burglary is daft and should be abolished!

Sean Hayden
Microagressor
Posts: 18978
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:55 pm
Contact:

Re: Time to suspend suspended sentences

Post by Sean Hayden » Sat Mar 14, 2015 7:07 pm

Rum -indeed :lol:

BG - We have people serving life for marijuana crimes. Can all those Feds be wrong? They are intelligent and well educated after all.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 15 guests