Soldiers: heroes?

Meekychuppet
Seriously, what happened?
Posts: 4193
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 8:19 pm
Contact:

Re: Soldiers: heroes?

Post by Meekychuppet » Wed Dec 22, 2010 3:14 pm

Robert_S wrote:
Meekychuppet wrote:
Robert_S wrote:
Meekychuppet wrote:It's hard to take anyone seriously with that OP if they haven't seen combat. Sorry.

I haven't seen combat either.
Why should a civilian not have anything to say about how society views soldiers?
I didn't say they can't. I said I won't take them seriously.
Not even after...
AshtonBlack wrote:I was a soldier and you're pretty much spot on. We basically did as we were told to the best of our abilities. I don't criticise the soldiers, but the politicians who led us into a situation.
I agree with your assessment, generally.
Have a look up thread. I posted about personal experience. Since I am not prepared to believe that Lozzer experienced war vicariously through AB I'd suggest our plea here is defunct at best. Furthermore, despite 'doing as we were told', what they were told could have killed them, so I stand by my post. All things being equal, I think someone who is risking their lives in a relatively poorly paid arm of the civil service can have my respect.

It reminds me of a story actually, I can't remember if this is from a film or not, but I read about it somewhere. US (I think) soldiers took in an enemy combatant whose guts had been blown out. After four (I think) days he asked for a drink and a soldier obliged. When his colleagues objected his response was 'anyone who can survive for four days like that can have water from my canteen'. I've no doubt made a pig's ear of that retelling, but I think it sums up how I feel. I've met a mix of military sorts, honourable men, career soldiers, idiots and dickheads (mostly dickheads I have to say). My opinion of them personally varies, but since they very kindly risk everything, and force their families to like it with the,they have take a drink from my canteen any day, so to speak. And you're right, that last bot does sound gay.

Besides, I know AB personally. He's a very modest bloke and is criminally underselling himself here.
Rum wrote:Does it occur to you that you have subscribed to the model of maleness you seem to be pushing in order to justify your innately hostile and aggressive nature? I have noticed it often and even wondered if it might be some sort of personality disorder. You should consider this possibility.

Rum wrote:Did I leave out being a twat? (With ref to your sig)
Things Rum has diagnosed me with to date: "personality disorder", autism, Aspergers.
eRvin wrote:People can see what a fucking freak you are. Have you not noticed all the disparaging comments you get?
rum wrote:What a cunt you are. Truly.

User avatar
Feck
.
.
Posts: 28391
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Soldiers: heroes?

Post by Feck » Wed Dec 22, 2010 3:19 pm

Isn't the 'drink from my canteen' from Apocalypse Now ? isn't the irony that the poor guy didn't get a drink ? Or did you miss the point of that too ?
:hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog:
Give me the wine , I don't need the bread

Meekychuppet
Seriously, what happened?
Posts: 4193
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 8:19 pm
Contact:

Re: Soldiers: heroes?

Post by Meekychuppet » Wed Dec 22, 2010 3:20 pm

Feck wrote:Isn't the 'drink from my canteen' from Apocalypse Now ? isn't the irony that the poor guy didn't get a drink ? Or did you miss the point of that too ?
Possibly. Never seen the film, but that's how I remember the telling.

Edit: I was being metaphorical, but since I haven't seen the film I could well be wrong about the meaning, but the point remains. Anyone willing to do such a dangerous job deserves at least a modicum of respect. I'm never going to have to die for astronomy, so I have the luxury of making this judgement.
Rum wrote:Does it occur to you that you have subscribed to the model of maleness you seem to be pushing in order to justify your innately hostile and aggressive nature? I have noticed it often and even wondered if it might be some sort of personality disorder. You should consider this possibility.

Rum wrote:Did I leave out being a twat? (With ref to your sig)
Things Rum has diagnosed me with to date: "personality disorder", autism, Aspergers.
eRvin wrote:People can see what a fucking freak you are. Have you not noticed all the disparaging comments you get?
rum wrote:What a cunt you are. Truly.

User avatar
Pappa
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Posts: 56488
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
Contact:

Re: Soldiers: heroes?

Post by Pappa » Wed Dec 22, 2010 4:06 pm

Meekychuppet wrote:
Feck wrote:Apocalypse Now
Never seen the film
:bslap2:
For information on ways to help support Rationalia financially, see our funding page.


When the aliens do come, everything we once thought was cool will then make us ashamed.

Pensioner
Grumpy old fart.
Posts: 3066
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 7:22 am
Contact:

Re: Soldiers: heroes?

Post by Pensioner » Wed Dec 22, 2010 4:38 pm

My eldest son wanted to join the Brit army all I said is why would you want to go and fight the rich man's wars.
“I wish no harm to any human being, but I, as one man, am going to exercise my freedom of speech. No human being on the face of the earth, no government is going to take from me my right to speak, my right to protest against wrong, my right to do everything that is for the benefit of mankind. I am not here, then, as the accused; I am here as the accuser of capitalism dripping with blood from head to foot.”

John Maclean (Scottish socialist) speech from the Dock 1918.

User avatar
sandinista
Posts: 2546
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:15 pm
About me: It’s a plot, but busta can you tell me who’s greedier?
Big corporations, the pigs or the media?
Contact:

Re: Soldiers: heroes?

Post by sandinista » Wed Dec 22, 2010 7:19 pm

good post Lozzer. I agree fully. There is nothing heroic about going off to war. It's just military propaganda, governments trying desperately to get a population to support unjust, brutal terrorism. Generally, in canada at least, even though the government tries to portray dead army folk as hero's, no one really buys it except the family of the deceased. I think that's just a defense mechanism to lessen the hurt of their son or daughter being killed for nothing.
Our struggle is not against actual corrupt individuals, but against those in power in general, against their authority, against the global order and the ideological mystification which sustains it.

User avatar
Santa_Claus
Your Imaginary Friend
Posts: 1985
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 7:06 pm
About me: Ho! Ho! Ho!
Contact:

Re: Soldiers: heroes?

Post by Santa_Claus » Wed Dec 22, 2010 7:34 pm

nice post lozzer.

the heroes thing is simply a cynical way to prop up support politically for a campaign that is simply about sucking up to the US.
I am Leader of all The Atheists in the world - FACT.

Come look inside Santa's Hole :ninja:

You want to hear the truth about Santa Claus???.....you couldn't handle the truth about Santa Claus!!!

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: Soldiers: heroes?

Post by Robert_S » Wed Dec 22, 2010 7:42 pm

sandinista wrote:good post Lozzer. I agree fully. There is nothing heroic about going off to war. It's just military propaganda, governments trying desperately to get a population to support unjust, brutal terrorism. Generally, in canada at least, even though the government tries to portray dead army folk as hero's, no one really buys it except the family of the deceased. I think that's just a defense mechanism to lessen the hurt of their son or daughter being killed for nothing.
I would be very surprised if nobody went off to war with the best of intentions and in a spirit of self sacrifice for a worthy cause. I don't think our wars are worthwhile I could be wrong on Afghanistan, but not on Iraq. It was plainly a stupid idea carried out stupidly.

But that says nothing about those kids fighting in them. Any one of them could be a hero, a murderous little shit, or someone trying to stay alive long enough to collect on that tuition they promise.
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
sandinista
Posts: 2546
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:15 pm
About me: It’s a plot, but busta can you tell me who’s greedier?
Big corporations, the pigs or the media?
Contact:

Re: Soldiers: heroes?

Post by sandinista » Wed Dec 22, 2010 7:48 pm

Robert_S wrote:
sandinista wrote:good post Lozzer. I agree fully. There is nothing heroic about going off to war. It's just military propaganda, governments trying desperately to get a population to support unjust, brutal terrorism. Generally, in canada at least, even though the government tries to portray dead army folk as hero's, no one really buys it except the family of the deceased. I think that's just a defense mechanism to lessen the hurt of their son or daughter being killed for nothing.
I would be very surprised if nobody went off to war with the best of intentions and in a spirit of self sacrifice for a worthy cause. I don't think our wars are worthwhile I could be wrong on Afghanistan, but not on Iraq. It was plainly a stupid idea carried out stupidly.

But that says nothing about those kids fighting in them. Any one of them could be a hero, a murderous little shit, or someone trying to stay alive long enough to collect on that tuition they promise.
Possibly someone may have gone with the "best of intentions", but I suppose the same could be said for anyone, anywhere involved in combat. Same with self sacrifice and a worthy cause, I'm pretty sure most suicide bombers feel that way as well. Just as likely to find a "hero" walking in any downtown city as in a warzone. If the "kids" fighting thought they had good intentions, they are either ignorant, or poorly informed.
Our struggle is not against actual corrupt individuals, but against those in power in general, against their authority, against the global order and the ideological mystification which sustains it.

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: Soldiers: heroes?

Post by Robert_S » Wed Dec 22, 2010 8:11 pm

I'm not going to get into a general discussion here about the rights and wrongs of the US's and UK's current wars. I just don't like seeing people in groups being judged positively or negatively as individuals merely for belonging to a group.
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
M
Arm wrestling champion
Posts: 3688
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:35 pm
Contact:

Re: Soldiers: heroes?

Post by M » Wed Dec 22, 2010 8:20 pm

Someone I know had a rant on Arsebook about nursing staff complaining about pay when "our boys" are dying in Afghanistan. I find that attitude absolutely infuriating. Both professions are presently chosen and neither have any bearing on the other. Nobody is fighting because they were conscripted ffs. Should a nurse not complain about her pay when he/she is cutting dead skin off a tramp's feet, bathing doubly incontinent pensioners, being abused by bleeding drunks, whilst earning the same money as a trainee teacher, just because someone else chose to join the army? GRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!!!
Bloody Greta Garbo

User avatar
sandinista
Posts: 2546
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:15 pm
About me: It’s a plot, but busta can you tell me who’s greedier?
Big corporations, the pigs or the media?
Contact:

Re: Soldiers: heroes?

Post by sandinista » Wed Dec 22, 2010 8:22 pm

Robert_S wrote:I'm not going to get into a general discussion here about the rights and wrongs of the US's and UK's current wars. I just don't like seeing people in groups being judged positively or negatively as individuals merely for belonging to a group.
Really? It's done all the time. Nazi's, muslim/christian fundamentalists, animal rights activists, "protesters", cops, inmates, etc. Personally, I think, what group you belong to tells a lot about you as an individual. Whether it be positive or negative.
Our struggle is not against actual corrupt individuals, but against those in power in general, against their authority, against the global order and the ideological mystification which sustains it.

User avatar
sandinista
Posts: 2546
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:15 pm
About me: It’s a plot, but busta can you tell me who’s greedier?
Big corporations, the pigs or the media?
Contact:

Re: Soldiers: heroes?

Post by sandinista » Wed Dec 22, 2010 8:23 pm

MCJ wrote:Someone I know had a rant on Arsebook about nursing staff complaining about pay when "our boys" are dying in Afghanistan. I find that attitude absolutely infuriating. Both professions are presently chosen and neither have any bearing on the other. Nobody is fighting because they were conscripted ffs. Should a nurse not complain about her pay when he/she is cutting dead skin off a tramp's feet, bathing doubly incontinent pensioners, being abused by bleeding drunks, whilst earning the same money as a trainee teacher, just because someone else chose to join the army? GRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!!!
THAT is ridiculous. Sounds like a moron falling for propaganda.
Our struggle is not against actual corrupt individuals, but against those in power in general, against their authority, against the global order and the ideological mystification which sustains it.

User avatar
floppit
Forum Mebmer
Posts: 3399
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 7:06 am
Contact:

Re: Soldiers: heroes?

Post by floppit » Wed Dec 22, 2010 8:33 pm

I don't think there's any large group of people who are all heroic or bad. I think most jobs contain a mix, both in motivations and actions.

I too find it odd that any single group be raised to hero status. Years ago I seem to remember building and agriculture were the country's most dangerous jobs, neither could we easily do without. My best mate and nurse would clean a tramp's feet any day over the time and emotion invested in having to fight to do her job properly in a now very privatised NHS. On te other hand she has colleagues raking it in because of the same changes. It's always a mixed bag of people. One dickwad soldier shouldn't mean all are damned and nor should one true hero make the abuse done by a dickwad ok.

Papers just want to sell papers, buyers often just want to feel 'better than .....' being more patriotic is a armchair way of getting the fix and the media knows it.
"Whatever it is, it spits and it goes 'WAAARGHHHHHHHH' - that's probably enough to suggest you shouldn't argue with it." Mousy.

User avatar
camoguard
The ferret with a microphone
Posts: 873
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 11:59 pm
About me: I'm very social and philosophically ambitious. Also, I'm chatty and enjoy getting to meet new people on or offline. I think I'm talented in writing and rapping. We'll see.
Location: Tennessee
Contact:

Re: Soldiers: heroes?

Post by camoguard » Wed Dec 22, 2010 8:38 pm

Lozzer wrote:It would seem that In Britain we have this renewed war-time spirit of elevating servicemen to the level of epic Greek protagonists, which isn't necessarily bad in itself, but it seems to be an indulgence where critique is simply not allowed. Individuals which happen to 'support our heroes' possess a moralist conceit as if their raging military advocacy actually has any bearing on the success of the Afghanistan/Iraq struggle.

SNIP

Rant over.
The military of your country represents you to some extent. Therefor, the metaphor is what happened to them would have happened to you except they were there. Sure, some of that is hype to keep people enlisted. But despite being a job, those people get shot at and they are expected to react sensibly and in many cases nonviolently while worrying about IEDs. That's a little heroic.

I'm biased because I was a hero once.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: rainbow and 16 guests