Fraternity Bans the Wearing of Confederate Uniforms

Post Reply
Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Fraternity Bans the Wearing of Confederate Uniforms

Post by Coito ergo sum » Fri Apr 23, 2010 8:27 pm

maiforpeace wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:
That being said, this kind of thing always irks me. I think people are hypersensitive.
What race are you Coito?
What does it matter?
maiforpeace wrote: I already know you are male, and straight, so the reason I am curious about your race is because I suspect you have never been the subject of obvious forms of discrimination based on race, sex, or orientation.
No, but we're talking about a uniform. Lot's of things are revolting to me, like the mere presence of Mosques and Islamic folk, because they represent, to me, discrimination, misogyny, backwardness, modern day slavery, Sha'ria law, and other awful things, but I don't expect them to worry about my sensibilities on that.

Nevertheless, as I mentioned, they are a private organization and if they want to ban people from wearing Crocs or baseball caps, or confederate uniforms, that's their deal. That kind of thing, however, irks me, because I think it does a disservice to the very thing that it is meant to protect. It imbues the Confederate uniform with power that it can only have if people give it that power.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Fraternity Bans the Wearing of Confederate Uniforms

Post by Coito ergo sum » Fri Apr 23, 2010 8:27 pm

born-again-atheist wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:
Ian wrote: A couple years ago I watched a parade in Suffolk, Virginia. Among all the local fire engines, high school bands and VFW guys were a group of white guys wearing Confederate uniforms and displaying the Stars & Bars. Okay, so they're proud of their heritage. Except that the crowd watching that parade was at least 1/3 black, none of whom clapped while those jerks marched past them. "Hypersensitive" my arse.
If they clapped, then they must not have been too "offended" by it.
Ian wrote: A couple years ago I watched a parade in Suffolk, Virginia. Among all the local fire engines, high school bands and VFW guys were a group of white guys wearing Confederate uniforms and displaying the Stars & Bars. Okay, so they're proud of their heritage. Except that the crowd watching that parade was at least 1/3 black, none of whom clapped while those jerks marched past them. "Hypersensitive" my arse.
That's good. And, if the people wearing the uniform get tired of being ignored or jeered, they'll stop wearing the uniform. Win-win.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Fraternity Bans the Wearing of Confederate Uniforms

Post by Coito ergo sum » Fri Apr 23, 2010 8:34 pm

Well, what they symbolize is a matter of opinion.

I have never heard anyone assert, though, that the Nazi flag and the Confederate Battle Flag symbolize the same thing. IF they mean the same thing to you, then that's what they symbolize to you.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Fraternity Bans the Wearing of Confederate Uniforms

Post by Coito ergo sum » Fri Apr 23, 2010 8:35 pm

Gawdzilla wrote:
Martok wrote:Both flags symbolize the same thing.
There's a great line from The Mote In God's Eye, set about 1,000 years in the future.

"... he supposed that either Kutuzov knew nothing of the history of communism--after all it had been a very long time ago--or his Russian nationalistic sympathies overcame it. Probably the former, since to most Imperials Lenin was the name of a hero from the past, a man know by legend but no detail. There were many such: Caesar, Ivan the Terrible, Napoleon, Churchill, Stalin, Washington, Jefferson, Trotsky, all more or less contemporaries (except to careful historian). Pre-atomic history tends to compress when seen from far enough away."
Great book. That is a must-read sci-fi book. Niven and Pournelle kick ass.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Fraternity Bans the Wearing of Confederate Uniforms

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Fri Apr 23, 2010 8:38 pm

Coito ergo sum wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:
Martok wrote:Both flags symbolize the same thing.
There's a great line from The Mote In God's Eye, set about 1,000 years in the future.

"... he supposed that either Kutuzov knew nothing of the history of communism--after all it had been a very long time ago--or his Russian nationalistic sympathies overcame it. Probably the former, since to most Imperials Lenin was the name of a hero from the past, a man know by legend but no detail. There were many such: Caesar, Ivan the Terrible, Napoleon, Churchill, Stalin, Washington, Jefferson, Trotsky, all more or less contemporaries (except to careful historian). Pre-atomic history tends to compress when seen from far enough away."
Great book. That is a must-read sci-fi book. Niven and Pournelle kick ass.
Try reading "The Battle of MacArthur" on acid. :coffee:
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
kiki5711
Forever with Ekwok
Posts: 3954
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:51 am
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Contact:

Re: Fraternity Bans the Wearing of Confederate Uniforms

Post by kiki5711 » Fri Apr 23, 2010 8:40 pm

Gawdzilla wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:
Martok wrote:Both flags symbolize the same thing.
There's a great line from The Mote In God's Eye, set about 1,000 years in the future.

"... he supposed that either Kutuzov knew nothing of the history of communism--after all it had been a very long time ago--or his Russian nationalistic sympathies overcame it. Probably the former, since to most Imperials Lenin was the name of a hero from the past, a man know by legend but no detail. There were many such: Caesar, Ivan the Terrible, Napoleon, Churchill, Stalin, Washington, Jefferson, Trotsky, all more or less contemporaries (except to careful historian). Pre-atomic history tends to compress when seen from far enough away."
Great book. That is a must-read sci-fi book. Niven and Pournelle kick ass.
Try reading "The Battle of MacArthur" on acid. :coffee:
Did you get past page one, or did all the words just fly into your eyes? :shifty: :shifty:

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Fraternity Bans the Wearing of Confederate Uniforms

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Fri Apr 23, 2010 8:43 pm

kiki5711 wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:Try reading "The Battle of MacArthur" on acid. :coffee:
Did you get past page one, or did all the words just fly into your eyes? :shifty: :shifty:
Acid, scifi, and guns. It was a very good afternoon. :naughty:
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

Martok
Posts: 512
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:18 am
Contact:

Re: Fraternity Bans the Wearing of Confederate Uniforms

Post by Martok » Fri Apr 23, 2010 8:46 pm

Coito ergo sum wrote:
Well, what they symbolize is a matter of opinion.
No its not.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Fraternity Bans the Wearing of Confederate Uniforms

Post by Coito ergo sum » Fri Apr 23, 2010 8:50 pm

[
Of course it is a matter of opinion. 20 years ago, there was no equivalency made between the Confederate flag and the Nazi flag, or at least hardly anyone did. What the flags symbolize - what anything symbolizes - is a matter of opinion. What else can it be? Empirical fact?
Last edited by Coito ergo sum on Fri Apr 23, 2010 9:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
maiforpeace
Account Suspended at Member's Request
Posts: 15726
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:41 am
Location: under the redwood trees

Re: Fraternity Bans the Wearing of Confederate Uniforms

Post by maiforpeace » Fri Apr 23, 2010 9:00 pm

owtth wrote:I'm less concerned about the uniform than I am over the fact that people still join fraternities :coffee:
That too. Though I suspect the reason why they are banning these uniforms are for the express purpose of attracting more people to join their fraternity, they must experiencing a drop in membership. Otherwise, why ban if they are having so much harmless fun? ;)
Coito ergo sum wrote:
maiforpeace wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:
That being said, this kind of thing always irks me. I think people are hypersensitive.
What race are you Coito?
What does it matter?
It doesn't - I added the next part to qualify that.
Coito ergo sum wrote:
maiforpeace wrote: I already know you are male, and straight, so the reason I am curious about your race is because I suspect you have never been the subject of obvious forms of discrimination based on race, sex, or orientation.
No, but we're talking about a uniform. Lot's of things are revolting to me, like the mere presence of Mosques and Islamic folk, because they represent, to me, discrimination, misogyny, backwardness, modern day slavery, Sha'ria law, and other awful things, but I don't expect them to worry about my sensibilities on that.

Nevertheless, as I mentioned, they are a private organization and if they want to ban people from wearing Crocs or baseball caps, or confederate uniforms, that's their deal. That kind of thing, however, irks me, because I think it does a disservice to the very thing that it is meant to protect. It imbues the Confederate uniform with power that it can only have if people give it that power.
It's not just any uniform, it's a confederate uniform. Whether a uniform or a flag, the majority of the uses of the confederate symbol has represented racism since the end of the civil war.

My reason for asking what race you were were just that I don't think you can truly understand how offensive something like that could be unless you have been the target of the hatred a symbol like that represents. It's easy to tell people not to give something power, if you haven't been on the shit end of the stick of exhibitions or actions of racism, religious bigotry, sexism etc. which have been practiced specifically for the purpose of displaying power.
Atheists have always argued that this world is all that we have, and that our duty is to one another to make the very most and best of it. ~Christopher Hitchens~
Image
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3534/379 ... 3be9_o.jpg[/imgc]

Martok
Posts: 512
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:18 am
Contact:

Re: Fraternity Bans the Wearing of Confederate Uniforms

Post by Martok » Fri Apr 23, 2010 9:03 pm

Coito ergo sum wrote:
Of course it is a matter of opinion. 20 years ago, there was no equivalency made between the Confederate flag and the Nazi flag, or at least hardly anyone did. What the flags symbolize - what anything symbolizes - is a matter of opinion. What else can it be? Empirical fact?
What utter nonsense.

Both flags represent racism, and bondage to the Nth degree.

Two wars were fought to destroy what those flags represent.


User avatar
kiki5711
Forever with Ekwok
Posts: 3954
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:51 am
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Contact:

Re: Fraternity Bans the Wearing of Confederate Uniforms

Post by kiki5711 » Fri Apr 23, 2010 9:07 pm

Martok wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:
Of course it is a matter of opinion. 20 years ago, there was no equivalency made between the Confederate flag and the Nazi flag, or at least hardly anyone did. What the flags symbolize - what anything symbolizes - is a matter of opinion. What else can it be? Empirical fact?
What utter nonsense.

Both flags represent racism, and bondage to the Nth degree.

Two wars were fought to destroy what those flags represent.
Very frank and to the point!


Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Fraternity Bans the Wearing of Confederate Uniforms

Post by Coito ergo sum » Fri Apr 23, 2010 9:13 pm

maiforpeace wrote: It's not just any uniform, it's a confederate uniform. Whether a uniform or a flag, the majority of the uses of the confederate symbol has represented racism since the end of the civil war.
I get that. I am, however, loathe to breathe life into dead symbols. The best way to give these things power is to try to bury them. You symbolically make the symbol a martyr. IMHO, it's better to ridicule the ridiculous. And, grown men parading around in Confederate uniforms reliving the Confederacy is ridiculous. Point and laugh.
maiforpeace wrote:
My reason for asking what race you were were just that I don't think you can truly understand how offensive something like that could be unless you have been the target of the hatred a symbol like that represents.
Well, if I can't understand it because of my genetics, then I am unable to counter that statement. I can in no way persuasively claim to know what someone else feels. I do know that a lot of African Americans are not particularly bothered by the uniform. A lot are, of course.
maiforpeace wrote: It's easy to tell people not to give something power, if you haven't been on the shit end of the stick of exhibitions or actions of racism, religious bigotry, sexism etc. which have been practiced specifically for the purpose of displaying power.
Perhaps. I don't think it serves anyone well, though, to continually bury offensive symbols. Far better to forcefully confront the message conveyed with an opposing message. Perhaps I have a thicker skin than most, but to me there is nothing some shit bag Nazi could say that would bother me, and Nazis discriminated against almost everyone (Jews, blacks, Catholics, gays, anyone with dark skin, Poles and other slavic peoples, you name it). The Nazis slaughtered the Poles and they were merciless against the Russians - more non-Jewish Poles and Russians died than alll the 6,000,000 Jews in the holocaust, yet nobody takes the "offense" of a non-Jewish Pole or a Russian against Nazi symbols nearly as seriously as the offense taken by Jews.

It's not a contest, of course. But, I don't think it serves an oppressed people to have that oppressed people set up as a group that needs to be "protected" from symbols or words.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests