The point is that you don't live in a hurricane zone, and the hurricane zones in the US are not the same - specifically Houston and the vicinity. The same things the Dutch do will not be the solution for Houston. Some of what the Dutch do is great for New Orleans, which is why the US takes seriously the Dutch proposals for helping further prepare New Orleans for the future.Scot Dutchy wrote:Nothing. We would have defences in place if we were living in a hurricane zone. We plan and build for the 1 in 10,000 year event not the 1 in 100 year.Forty Two wrote:I wonder what would happen to the Netherlands if it got hit by a CAT 4 dropping 1.3 meters of water in a few days....
A hurricane risk is, of course, far different from the risks the Netherlands faces, which is primarily a result of it being low-lying, and below sea level. Can folks not see that this is different than living in a place which faces an occasional risk of a massive storm? And, can't folks see that building polders and dikes is not going to put a huge dent in what happened in Houston. Getting hit by a hurricane is more like getting hit by a bomb. There's only so much you can do.
Houston is a city that covers 600 square miles and is above sea level. It is not storm surge or flooding from the ocean that's the problem. The Houston flooding was a result of about 10 trillion gallons of water falling in three days, and the rain total over less than a week was like 5 feet -- about a meter and a half.
There is obviously stuff that can be done. But, please, stop it with the "just do what the Dutch do" or point to some other region and exclaim that the silly Americans just can't handle it. This is not the same situation as what other countries have faced. And, the Netherlands is a blip on the map. If it got hit with Hurricane Harvey, it would have suffered massive damage too. And, to sit here and say that the Dutch are so awesome they would have known to build whatever needed to be built so nothing would have happened. That's just stupid conceit.