Donald Trump warns of the Muslim Problem

[DaveDodo007]

2.Second, much more commonly, "Cultural Marxism" is used as a snarl word used by reactionaries to red-bait anyone with progressive tendencies. The term alludes to a conspiracy theory in which sinister left-wingers in media, academia, and science are engaged in a decades-long plot to undermine Western culture. Perhaps with some "Sexual Bolshevism" thrown in for good measure.

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Cultural_Marxism

Ok, so basically it's empty rhetoric. Great. Tell me why I should bother responding to someone who labels me a pejorative that is based in nothing but empty rhetoric?

Rationalwiki was set up to oppose conservapedia and with that they are just as bad as each other. It is a SJW hub.

Well he told me to google it, and that's what came up in the second hit (the top was some random person's blog). Can you tell me what it means?

I don't normally trust Wikipedia but the sources check out on this page.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frankfurt_School

[pErvinalia]

Lol, the only mention of cultural Marxism on that page is the same nuts conspiracy theory mentioned on the rational wiki page. So it's still empty rhetoric?

[Seth]

A constitution with inalienable rights is merely a piece of paper that despotism and tyranny wipes its ass with.

Not if one of the unalienable rights is the individual right to keep and bear arms that provides an armed citizenry capable of putting down a tyrant.

Dictatorship is something different. Sure, it could happen,

Not really and since you admit that it could happen the rest of your argument is vacuous.

but you'd need a majority of muslims in the parliament (and therefore in the population) and in the military to stop the military from defending the constitution. That's 50+ percent. And that's contingent on either the muslims in parliament totally lying before they were elected, or the muslim voting population supporting them in a quest for sharia law. Get your calculator out and start calculating. The last calculation I did was something like 100 years away. I think we've got bigger worries in that time frame than western muslims staging an Islamic revolution.

Thanks for admitting you're wrong and that I'm right. The time frame is not really relevant. As I said, the Muslims are in it for the long game, and if it takes a hundred years, it takes a hundred years. They''ve already been at it for 1400 years.

Ok, so on what basis do you claim that muzzies are going to have an Islamic revolution in the west, given they make up a tiny fraction of our populations?

On the basis that there's about 2 billion of them, all of whom want to live in an Islamic Caliphate and hundreds of thousands of whom are flooding over the borders of Europe at this very moment. You really don't get it. The Islamic Hegira has already begun and it's purpose is to flood non-Muslim countries with Muslims who will breed more Muslims, by the dozen.

[Seth]

None of that makes any sense. More empty rhetoric like "identity politics" which doesn't make sense to me. And for the 4 millionth time, I'm ideologically an anarchist and pragmatically a capitalist. Don't let that stop your silly rants, though.

You're a liar. I've never once heard anything from you that remotely suggests you're anything but a Marxist.

[pErvinalia]

A constitution with inalienable rights is merely a piece of paper that despotism and tyranny wipes its ass with.

Not if one of the unalienable rights is the individual right to keep and bear arms that provides an armed citizenry capable of putting down a tyrant.

Dictatorship is something different. Sure, it could happen,

Not really and since you admit that it could happen the rest of your argument is vacuous.

but you'd need a majority of muslims in the parliament (and therefore in the population) and in the military to stop the military from defending the constitution. That's 50+ percent. And that's contingent on either the muslims in parliament totally lying before they were elected, or the muslim voting population supporting them in a quest for sharia law. Get your calculator out and start calculating. The last calculation I did was something like 100 years away. I think we've got bigger worries in that time frame than western muslims staging an Islamic revolution.

Thanks for admitting you're wrong and that I'm right. The time frame is not really relevant. As I said, the Muslims are in it for the long game, and if it takes a hundred years, it takes a hundred years. They''ve already been at it for 1400 years.

Ok, so on what basis do you claim that muzzies are going to have an Islamic revolution in the west, given they make up a tiny fraction of our populations?

On the basis that there's about 2 billion of them, all of whom want to live in an Islamic Caliphate and hundreds of thousands of whom are flooding over the borders of Europe at this very moment. You really don't get it. The Islamic Hegira has already begun and it's purpose is to flood non-Muslim countries with Muslims who will breed more Muslims, by the dozen.

Well sign me up for Crusades: The Sequel.

[pErvinalia]

None of that makes any sense. More empty rhetoric like "identity politics" which doesn't make sense to me. And for the 4 millionth time, I'm ideologically an anarchist and pragmatically a capitalist. Don't let that stop your silly rants, though.

You're a liar. I've never once heard anything from you that remotely suggests you're anything but a Marxist.

Fuck off. I've explained it to you many times. You think Bush was a Marxist and the IMF (the biggest neoliberal organisation in the world) is Marxist. You don't even know what a Marxist or a neoliberal are.

[Seth]

None of that makes any sense. More empty rhetoric like "identity politics" which doesn't make sense to me. And for the 4 millionth time, I'm ideologically an anarchist and pragmatically a capitalist. Don't let that stop your silly rants, though.

You're a liar. I've never once heard anything from you that remotely suggests you're anything but a Marxist.

Fuck off. I've explained it to you many times.

Not once. You claim it and then turn right around and expound pure-quill Marxist dialectical rhetoric and propaganda.

You think Bush was a Marxist

No, Bush is a Progressive and a Marxist useful idiot. Obama is the Marxist.

[pErvinalia]

[rainbow]

No, Bush is a Progressive and a Marxist useful idiot. Obama is the Marxist.

Only the Retarded Rightwing Rimsters would think that.

[Collector1337]

Well sign me up for Crusades: The Sequel.

Don't worry. It's coming. No doubt you too big of a pussy to fight though, so prepare yourself to be purged by Muslims.

[Collector1337]

[Collector1337]

The cancer that is Islam just keeps going and going.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/639 ... -mum-death

15yo kills her own mother to please her 29yo Muslim "boyfriend" who radicalized her.

[Collector1337]

[NineBerry]

[Seth]

No, Bush is a Progressive and a Marxist useful idiot. Obama is the Marxist.

Only the Retarded Rightwing Rimsters would think that.

Only a fucknut left-wing Marxist useful idiot wouldn't.