"Alt-right" Parading Ignorance, Stupidity, Malice, Etc.

[pErvinalia]

So it is something you use as an accusation, not as a useful label.

Why can't it be both?

JimC, you are obviously alt-right.

White
Male
Angry
etc

No he's not. Nice quotemine.

I know how to value your contributions. If you get too uppity, someone will ask you direct questions, and you will flee with

trololololololo

You've been asked a huge number of questions that you've repeatedly avoided. trolololol indeed.

[Cunt]

So it is something you use as an accusation, not as a useful label.

Why can't it be both?

JimC, you are obviously alt-right.

White
Male
Angry
etc

No he's not. Nice quotemine.

I know how to value your contributions. If you get too uppity, someone will ask you direct questions, and you will flee with

trololololololo

You've been asked a huge number of questions that you've repeatedly avoided. trolololol indeed.

Sorry, didn't mean to.

What can I answer for you?

[JimC]

Cunt wrote:

JimC, you are obviously alt-right.

White
Male
Angry

The first two only. I'm generally quite calm... What I don't have is:

* a strong distaste for anything that is not traditional, hetero sex
* a feeling that my race is superior, and that the "other" is dirty, dangerous or both
* a need for a strong leader
* a taste for violence

[Cunt]

Cunt wrote:

JimC, you are obviously alt-right.

White
Male
Angry

The first two only. I'm generally quite calm... What I don't have is:

* a strong distaste for anything that is not traditional, hetero sex
* a feeling that my race is superior, and that the "other" is dirty, dangerous or both
* a need for a strong leader
* a taste for violence

Most people have a distaste for anything that is not traditional, hetero sex. You can tell by watching what the majority tastes.

Each race seems to think that their race is superior. How many are vilified regularly for saying so? (Newfoundlanders excluded)

Need for a strong leader? A taste for violence? I guess I would accuse anyone who comes from a country with a strong leader, or a military...

Sounds like those characteristics would be applied differently based on who was evaluating.

Any more objective stuff? Or will it be good enough to acknowledge that it is not much better than namecalling?

I mean, you don't want to name one, and allow them to answer...it seems you just want to be insulated from having that accusation tested.

I stand by you being one, based on your own description. You tick all the boxes except the angry one.

[Animavore]

A need for a strong leader

Again, this makes no sense. They voted for a weak, craven patsy. If they really liked strong leaders they'd've voted for Hillary instead of base scum.

[Cunt]

A need for a strong leader

Again, this makes no sense. They voted for a weak, craven patsy. If they really liked strong leaders they'd've voted for Hillary instead of base scum.

I hope you all continue to go around insulting Trump supporters. The mid-terms are coming, and that will help Trump win.

I don't know the democrats platform except 'Fuck Trump'. At least Trump keeps slapping Ms. Justin Trudeau around. That's some funny shit.

[Animavore]

And obviously, from that, we can take it that anyone who thinks a weak pasty is strong to them is even weaker by definition.

[Sean Hayden]

Everyone's a fucking idiot. I'm running away with Crumple to await the apocalypse.

[pErvinalia]

Cunt wrote:

JimC, you are obviously alt-right.

White
Male
Angry

The first two only. I'm generally quite calm... What I don't have is:

* a strong distaste for anything that is not traditional, hetero sex
* a feeling that my race is superior, and that the "other" is dirty, dangerous or both
* a need for a strong leader
* a taste for violence

Most people have a distaste for anything that is not traditional, hetero sex. You can tell by watching what the majority tastes.

Each race seems to think that their race is superior. How many are vilified regularly for saying so? (Newfoundlanders excluded)

Need for a strong leader? A taste for violence? I guess I would accuse anyone who comes from a country with a strong leader, or a military...

Sounds like those characteristics would be applied differently based on who was evaluating.

Any more objective stuff? Or will it be good enough to acknowledge that it is not much better than namecalling?

I mean, you don't want to name one, and allow them to answer...it seems you just want to be insulated from having that accusation tested.

I stand by you being one, based on your own description. You tick all the boxes except the angry one.

No you are!

Seriously, what a retarded argument. Jim ticks two boxes, white and male. Any more than that is you playing lame rhetorical games bordering on trolling. Twat.

[JimC]

You forgot the other boxes! Brilliant, loveable but a little eccentric!

[pErvinalia]

Maffs spiritualist..

[JimC]

I resemble that remark!

[Cunt]

I am highlighting how it doesn't give much clarity.

Maybe I'm asking wrong. I'll try this. What is the difference between right, and alt-right?

How could a public figure acquit themselves of the charge of being 'alt-right', if they actually were not?

[pErvinalia]

I am highlighting how it doesn't give much clarity.

It gives heaps of clarity. And all you've highlighted is how fucking bad you are at rhetoric (or alternatively how good you are at trolling).

Maybe I'm asking wrong. I'll try this. What is the difference between right, and alt-right?

Go to fucking altright.com ffs. You can find all you want there.

[Brian Peacock]

What about the example your asked for Cunt, and which I gave? Didn't you find that informative?